Brown
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2001
- Messages
- 12,984
From CNN and AP:
The Seventh Circuit suggested that law enforcement officials need to enforce the law without regard to their religion. You certainly don't want an officer deciding which laws he will or won't enforce based upon his religious beliefs.
Besides, being a casino cop is cushy work! You get to stay indoors, in a temperature-controlled environment. Restrooms and refreshments are handy. Most patrons are well-behaved. You don't have to deal with things like domestic disturbances or drunken drivers or auto wrecks. Was this officer just stupid or what?
I'm rather at a loss to understand the officer's religious complaint, especially since "he was not opposed to general casino crime-fighting." Is it that he didn't want to be around sinners? Well, if he didn't want to be around sinners, then perhaps he picked the wrong profession (and possibly the wrong planet).The Supreme Court rejected an appeal Monday from an Indiana law officer fired for refusing to work at a casino.
The state trooper had said that the gambling enforcement assignment would force him to violate his religious beliefs.
...
[Benjamin] Endres, who is Baptist, said he was not opposed to general casino crime-fighting, but could not go along when the state designated him a full-time gaming officer and ordered him to report to a casino in Michigan City, Indiana.
The Seventh Circuit suggested that law enforcement officials need to enforce the law without regard to their religion. You certainly don't want an officer deciding which laws he will or won't enforce based upon his religious beliefs.
Besides, being a casino cop is cushy work! You get to stay indoors, in a temperature-controlled environment. Restrooms and refreshments are handy. Most patrons are well-behaved. You don't have to deal with things like domestic disturbances or drunken drivers or auto wrecks. Was this officer just stupid or what?