Transwomen are not Women - Part 15

[Emily's Cat]

On the other hand, we have had, and propose restoring, barriers that would slow down the exhibitionist, the voyeur, the harasser.

Barriers that were removed at Planet Fitness, resulting in exhibitionism, harassment, and the banning of the woman who complained. This has all been explained to you before, repeatedly and at length. Why is it not sticking in your mind?

Smoooooooth brain.... No wrinkles or lumps, no valleys or bumps...

 

[Thermal]

Your willingness to alter phrasing in order to produce an entirely different meaning never ceases to astonish me. Like right here - I said "observe feet and shadows under the edge" by which a reasonable person with a normally functioning brain would understand that some short people's feet aren't necessarily going to be visible depending on the angle of viewing, but that the shadow of a person in a stall will usually be visible

Lol, no, I hadn't really considered an adult on a toilet whose feet are dangling six inches or more off the floor, so you have to scan for shadows from above to determine human occupancy.You got me there

I find it interesting that you never scan for feet or shadows, but you simultaneously want to know who is where and which stalls are occupied, and you scan enough to know that. "I never look, but I always know" is some next-level situational awareness there, bud.

Jesus motherr ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ christ. I literally said, in the post you quoted, that I DO SCAN FOR FEET, and you immediately say I say I don't.

That's it. I'm done. There is no possible way you got that or the other 10,000 times you have bald faced lied about the words in front of you BY ACCIDENT. You are doing this ◊◊◊◊ on purpose.

 

[Emily's Cat]

For the 10,000th time: I DONT.

And yet you consistently argue that somehow we're all bad people for apparently agreeing with you.

Jesus Christ, EC, how many times do I have to repeat this to you? Self policing, with no force of law in either direction. No 'requirements', and for damn sure you have not 'misunderstood' that each of the 10,000 times it has been repeated to you.

This no longer works. "Self policing" is ineffective when 1) the ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ laws give males the right to use female spaces by law based on their professed feelings about their gendered soul and 2) females who try to evict males are subjected to harassment, eviction, and threats!

Self policing allows my wife and kids, who are not bothered by this, to live and let live, as well as this Planet Fitness young woman who knew he was there but didn't have an issue with it (till the weird ◊◊◊◊). I hate to break it to you, but a lot of women are +/- okay with it.

I guarantee the female wasn't okay with it - they said they were uncomfortable about it. What do you think they should have done? Do you think females should physically challenge a male in a female space? Are you going to pretend like males and females are physically equal, and that a male who intentionally and purposefully engages in boundary violations and ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ whacking it in the female restroom is somehow going to be cowed by a female telling them to leave? FFS, what world do you live in?

If you feel upset or threatened, sound the alarm. Guys like the woman's boyfriend and yours truly are dime a dozen, and we are not shy. If you are worried about police, the courts, and society at large condemning you for objecting, well... you might want to take a long look in the mirror. Every facet of Western Civilization is not hypnotized by TRAs. They ain't MKUltra. We just agree with them, to different degrees.

They're a dime a dozen... except when it's a horde of ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ telling the females at WiSpa that they're nasty transphobic bigots for being unhappy about a free-swinging naked dick on the female side of the spa.

Seriously, every single ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ time you find a way to blame the females when males violate our boundaries.

 

[Emily's Cat]

I get your point. You clearly don't get mine, so that's the focus of my responses

And you didn't answer the question. Am I at your mercy and under your complete control because you happen to have a handgun and I dont?

You are at my mercy, yes. You are dependent on my goodwill, and my lack of a desire to harm you. Because if the fungus were to take over my brain and make me go all homicidal... I would be capable of shooting you and there's not really much you could do about it.

You seriously seem to have an issue with the idiom "at the mercy of". Like, you seem to be envisioning some power hungry caricature of a cartoon villain laughing maniacally while dangly you over an open pit of lava or something.

 

[Emily's Cat]

Lol, no, I hadn't really considered an adult on a toilet whose feet are dangling six inches or more off the floor, so you have to scan for shadows from above to determine human occupancy.You got me there

Jesus motherr ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ christ. I literally said, in the post you quoted, that I DO SCAN FOR FEET, and you immediately say I say I don't.

And in the post prior to that - which I also posted, you said:

How many times a day to you inspect the feet and shadow movement of others in a public restroom? I've never looked for half a second.

 

[Ziggurat]

"You're gonna get raped anyway, just stop fighting it and accept your plight" is not the compelling argument you seem to think it is.

Jimmy Carr had a joke along these lines:

You can end all rape. Just say "yes".​

But the point of the joke isn't that it's a good idea. It's that it's a horrific idea.