Matabiri
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2003
- Messages
- 1,732
Not sure whether to have put this here or Skepticism, but...
Watching Tony Blair perform on various news shows, it seems to me that he firmly believes what he's saying about the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq, despite having to deny any previous equivocation and say that any evidence to the contrary is "taken out of context".
Does anyone else think that he's convinced himself that he really did never mislead anyone, and that he truly did present the facts properly, and that this conviction (rather than knowing he's being caught out) is the reason for his increasing irritation with the questions?
Watching Tony Blair perform on various news shows, it seems to me that he firmly believes what he's saying about the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq, despite having to deny any previous equivocation and say that any evidence to the contrary is "taken out of context".
Does anyone else think that he's convinced himself that he really did never mislead anyone, and that he truly did present the facts properly, and that this conviction (rather than knowing he's being caught out) is the reason for his increasing irritation with the questions?