These UFO Photos are REAL

I recall a great quote from the movie that CSICOP produced years ago, where they were examining the UFO videos from Florida.

"This film is 99% authentic. Only the UFO is faked."
 
wow, "it's dangerous" for them to even have these pictures!

Do you think the Men in BLack are going to come visit them?
 
I must say that it's clear that those two bottom photos have not been faked. They are authentic photographs of tin pie plates thrown into the air.
 
The memo is funny enough without the photos.
Utmost secrecy must be maintained at all costs.
heh heh heh.
'Debrief' is a real word and should not be in quotes. Implies that the text was written by a non military person trying to use military jargon.
 
On a serious note (if one can be serious about ufo loonies) I think because of the ability for computerized photos to seem to be very real, and with the state of animation and movie making, that there will sometime be an agreed on date, after which no ufo picture will be accepted. Say, 1953 when it was possible to erase the wires holding the ufo up.

Hopefully the whole thing will die out like the chem-trail crap.
 
jimmygun said:
On a serious note (if one can be serious about ufo loonies) I think because of the ability for computerized photos to seem to be very real, and with the state of animation and movie making, that there will sometime be an agreed on date, after which no ufo picture will be accepted. Say, 1953 when it was possible to erase the wires holding the ufo up.

Hopefully the whole thing will die out like the chem-trail crap.

There are some mathematical techniques that can be used to tell whether an image has been tampered with or not (kinda). Histograms, fourier transforms etc.

The ability to easily manipulate digital photos has ramifications for lots of things though. Criminal investigations, for one.

Think about it, over the last few decades, how many photos that have been used in evidence haven't been taken by 'officials'. If you have a jackass dent your car, you'd take the photo yourself rather than get a policeman to do it. In the past this wasn't a big issue because trickery was limited to cutting and pasting negatives, or using matts.

Now consider how many people have gone to their local electronics store and bought a camera/printer combo in the last 10 years. People aren't going to use film anymore, but how will this be for standards of evidence?
 

Back
Top Bottom