specious_reasons
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2002
- Messages
- 1,124
Well, I just voted in the most important election in Illinois today. It was most certainly not the Presidential primary. I'm talking about the race for the Junior US Senate seat being vacated by Sen. Fitzgerald.
Fitzgerald is an independent minded Republican, who was not going to get any financial backing from his party. Rather than spend his own wealth, he decided not to run again.
Well, the field's wide open, with 8 Republicans and 7 Democrats.
Not surprisingly I voted Democrat. Dan Hynes. I figure it's time to put more fiscally responsible Dems into Washington. They do exist, you know.
What blows my mind, though: Fitzgerald was fairly well respected, there was a decent chance for him to win, although I was assuming it was going to be a tough battle. Why did the Republican Party refuse to back someone with a chance to win, rather than gamble on an entirely new candidate, who, in my opinion, seems likely to lose?
Fitzgerald is an independent minded Republican, who was not going to get any financial backing from his party. Rather than spend his own wealth, he decided not to run again.
Well, the field's wide open, with 8 Republicans and 7 Democrats.
Not surprisingly I voted Democrat. Dan Hynes. I figure it's time to put more fiscally responsible Dems into Washington. They do exist, you know.
What blows my mind, though: Fitzgerald was fairly well respected, there was a decent chance for him to win, although I was assuming it was going to be a tough battle. Why did the Republican Party refuse to back someone with a chance to win, rather than gamble on an entirely new candidate, who, in my opinion, seems likely to lose?
Crap! I've been misunderstanding that forever. How embarassing! But actually, the meaning was much the same, at least in my head.