OK, here goes:
We all know the Sun radiates heat to the ground and causes evaporation, from the puddles on the footpath to the oceans and rain forests, yet there is no way the Sun can cause the evaporation to fall back to the Earth. Moreover, it can rain at night, when there is no Sun in the sky. The Sun cannot make it rain or snow, something else must be responsible.
Incredibly silly. Temperature changes makes it rain or snow. The heat comes from the sun.
There is only one other thing in the sky capable of exerting the necessary huge forces that would be required.
Any rules that apply to the sun for influencing conditions on earth also apply to the moon. The moon cannot excert any forces on earth that the sun cannot, and of all the forces they excert, only the tidal force from the moon is the stronger.
We are told that the Moon has about one sixth of the Earth’s gravitational force. This has come into dispute since the Apollo moon landings.
*sniiiip*
Observations of the NASA video tapes, and television broadcasts indicated that Young made several attempts to jump as high as he could but with no success in achieving a height of more than 18 inches.
Incredibly silly. If the gravitional force of the moon was not
exactly as predicted, the Apollo capsules would have crashed on the surface.
And in nice truther style, we are asked to instead take the author's interpretation of a video as a higher authority than the assembled scientific community. Let us just ignore that we have no idea how hard Young tried to jump. Let us pretend that he wasn't carrying his own weight in spacesuit and life-support equipment, and that there was no safety issue in high-jumping in an entensely hostile environment. Let us not speculate on why he fell so slowly from his jumps, or how the astronauts managed to take off from the moon against an unexpected high gravity. In other words, let us try not to think at all.
Whatever the Moon's gravity is, is sufficient to haul our seas around beneath its transit. It also hauls the air.
It even pulls a bit on he mountains.
From only a couple of hundred thousand miles away, changes in the Moon's orbital patterns are going to have major effects on Earth. Between a third and a quarter the size of Earth, the Moon is equivalent in size to a smaller person running around and around an adult, all day every day. Ask yourself, would that affect you? Better still, ask the mother of a two-year-old.
And let us for gawd's sake
not ask ourselves if the orbit of the moon is perchance a tiddle more stable than the trajectory of a two-year-old.
Simply stated, changes in the Moon’s movement can trigger changes in our weather. How it works is really rather logical but scientists seem to have a vested interest in not stating it. Possible reasons for this political manoeuvring will soon become clearer.
My guess is that they are waiting for any changes in the moon's movements. And not holding their breath.
If the Moon has an effect on the sea then it must control the tides by distribution of the water. So is it too silly to state that if it has an effect on the atmosphere then it must control the weather by distribution of the clouds?
Yes, is indeed too silly. You see, clouds form, move and disappear because of temperature differences.
The answer is that there are times when Earth's gravitational force is nullified, and these are special positions of the Sun and Moon and planets, from which forces from above can effect changes on Earth.
Nullified?
..I sincerely hope not. That would make one hell of a mess.
Part of the problem is that we are very locked in to what we can see, and that goes for our technology, in which we only believe that which we can see through instruments of our own making. But does that not mean that forces do not exist for which we have not yet invented instruments to measure.
Incredibly silly statement afther he has gone on for quite some lenght about a lot of things that should be blindingly obvious to any observer.
In effect he says: "I realize that nobody has observed all these things I claim, but that is just because we don't have the technology to see them."
.. Yeah, sure, but then how do they influence the weather, and all that jazz? Wouldn't we sorta observe that, just a
little bit?
And as the atmosphere has its daily tide, the air density too is forever changing. If it did not, barometric pressures would always remain constant.
Just when you think it can't get any sillier, he surpasses himself. As anybody who owns a barometer will know, the air pressure does not vary in any regular way, like the tide. Sooo, there
must be something else at work. Right, you guessed it! Temperature variations, driven by the little ol Sun.
We can't see a high AIR tide because we haven't yet invented an instrument to detect it.
Whaat? You just said it influenced barometric pressure?? Make up your mind, now.
The really rich thing about this is, of course, that the tides in the atmosphere, which certainly exist, although they are more or less drowned out by the many other influences do NOT influence barometric pressure
. This is because the increased air column id countered by the upward pull from the moon. But of course we have other ways of measuring the thickness of the atmosphere.
Every New moon time, for two or three days, the Moon shields us from the solar wind; that electromagnetic energy force-field sent forth into space by the Sun.
Nonsense. The moon does not have a magnetic field, so it does not influence solar wind, except when it is in the direct line-of-sight. And then we have a solar eclipse. Which, as any sane peson knows, is a rather rare occurrence.
No reason to dissect the rest of this junk. Since the premises are wrong, any truths in the conclusions will be purely coincidential.
Hans
