• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Ladybrook Affaire

UnrepentantSinner

A post by Alan Smithee
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
26,984
Location
Dallas, Texas
Please note for the purpose of this thread Lucianarchy's "ladybrook" RV will be considered a hit.

On July 19 Lucianarcy posted a demonstration of it's remote viewing skills and ostensibly posted a hit with the word "ladybrook."

Thirtyone days have passed and all that has come from this demonstration is back and forth about time signatures on the forum and ad nauseums about minutia. I have not seen (and it's entirely possible I missed) further demonstrations of Lucianarchy's superpowers which were not subject to questions about time signatures that were a hit. Just lots of arguing about "ladybrook."

I propose Lucianarchy's Clock, that will record how many days have passed since the "ladybrook" hit and further less contested, clearly demonstrable demonstrations of it's superpowers.

Today, August 20th is day:

32
 
I confidently predict that the next number will be in the range 39 to 45.

Edited to add to infinity probably.
 
BINGO!

37, 38, 39 Blue! Hut hut, hike!

38, 39, (girl walks in the room), 100 pushups.
 
I was away from my computer for a few days and got behind. If anyone else wants to keep track of whether Lucianarcy can pull another "Ladybrook" out of the matrix and post it to JREF feel free.
 
asthmatic camel said:


ROFL, how are the family jewels ? Hope you had acupuncture to kill the pain.
I had a form of acupuncture, Instead of an acupunctire needle they used a needle loaded with local.....

The family jewels are fine......

Gaza.
 
40 , 40 irrational skeptics!

'Take one down, pass em around, 40 irrational skeptics debating religious people religiously.'

That is one catchy tune.
 
T'ai Chi said:
40 , 40 irrational skeptics!

'Take one down, pass em around, 40 irrational skeptics debating religious people religiously.'

That is one catchy tune.

I'd give it a 2, the lyrics are inane, but not trollish enough and I can't dance to it.
 
Ha! The rating scale was only out of 2, with 2 being the highest. That shows what you fancy-pants skeptics know.

;)
 
UnrepentantSinner said:
What are you, a 3rd grader? You don't even troll well. Later.

You must have the IQ of a 2nd grader, because you've responded to everything I've said.

Way to ignore the "trolls" skippy!

:roll:
 

Back
Top Bottom