The horrible megatsunami, coming soon...

shadron

Philosopher
Joined
Sep 2, 2005
Messages
5,918
About ten years ago, the BBC, at loose ends, decided to locate and scare everyone with a whole new disaster-in-waiting, another Yellowstone caldera eruption (it's been so overdone) to raise awareness of the program's sponsors (at any rate the sponsors when it makes it to America), and keep the BBC relevant. I'll say at the outset that I really admire a lot of the BBC/Horizon doco output, but there are some times when even the best slip up. Casting about, they caught the eye of some scientists in London...

The result was Megatsunami!, a one hour doco on the scientific certainty of a monstrous wave in your future, if you happen to live on the eastern US seaboard. It seems a tsunami of monstrous proportions is headed your way, with the same inevitability as that of the next New Madrid earthquake.

The story starts out in a small (well, maybe 12 square mile) bay in southern Alaska called Lituya Bay. Geologists (in the 50s, so the story goes) noted that the coasts of the bay had been denuded of trees and topsoil up to a half kilometer above the bay, and while they had no ready answer, they took it under advisement for the time being. On July 9, 1958, a 7.7 earthquake caused a huge landslide at the top of the bay, and the resulting waves reached 1740 feet vertically up the slopes. There's a dramatic, but irrelevant story about a man and his son fishing on a boat in the bay that day, which the doco plays well up. So, now we know what caused the slope anomaly. Unfortunately, Wikipedia records that three other landslides have been witnessed in the bay: in 1854 (waves 395 feet high), 1899 (200 feet) and 1936 (490 feet), so I begin to feel there is as much weaving as telling of this story.

What if, the story continues, there is the possibility of scaling this local disaster up into something earth shaking? Enter the London scientists, Dr. Simon Day and Dr. Steven Ward of the Benfield Hazard Research Center of the University College of London. They have been investigating the scaling up of Lituya Bay into a world shaking theory of supertsunamis. In the doco, they concentrate on the Canary Island of Las Palmas off the African coast, which is principally the volcano Cumbre Vieja. A typical strato-volcano, its slopes are mainly loosely held ejecta, and are therefore prone to landslides, similar to avalanches between levels of loose material on a slope. One slope is on the western side of the island, with nothing between it and the US eastern seaboard but about 3400 miles of open Atlantic. If that slope were to slip into the Atlantic, why, we could expect a 100 foot wave on Miami Beach, for starters.

Proof: Well, they have some really neat computer graphics. One shows the difference between an ordinary tsunami (maybe 20, 30 ft tall at most, caused by a basement rock drop/rise) and a supertsunami (caused by a landslide), and it's, by george, 100 ft tall. Then there's a neat experiment at a Swiss (I think, can't be sure) facility where they slide a load of rocks into one end of a 5 foot wide tank maybe 50 ft long, and watch the water dramatically run up the slope at the other end. Finally, some friendly geologists wander about the island and note slippages on the slope, and gasp at dikes which must be holding the water high enough to lubricate the rocks (cue another experiment with a couple of bricks on a slope and a hose feeding water between them, and watch the top one slide off.) Some more graphics, including the typical tsunami graphic, with the red flame shape shooting out of the island towards - yes, the US coast, and some final words about 'not if, but when'.

I'm going to continue this thread with the research I've done and observations I've noted a little later. This little contretemps leads me to some odd conclusions about science, but I'd like to hear other opinions, must certainly from volcano, Correa Neto and/or Dinwar, and other scientists who may have stopped and looked at this, as well as opinions of anyone else interested. More to come.

Link to Megatsunami!:



This is just a trailer. The whole thing doesn't seem to be on YouTube any longer, though it used to be. No doubt it can be found somewhere on the net.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if it's the same program, but I remember a show I saw a number of years ago on the Discovery Channel (Canadian version) that was on this same topic. From what I recall it seemed to be rationally plausible. If the side of that particular volcano does eventually collapse into the ocean, those millions of tons of rock are going to displace a hell of a lot of seawater.
 
We are so doomed.
I'd like to see a top ten list of our doomed-ness.
But I guess it would be off topic.
I live on the New Madrid fault, below a huge impoundment.
 
I remember the show in question and also that other scientists have since argued that the Cumbre Vieja volcano is quite unlikely to cause the kind of catastrophic landslides depicted in the programme. As far as the science goes, I don't think this was one of Horizon's better episodes.
 
We are so doomed.
I'd like to see a top ten list of our doomed-ness.
But I guess it would be off topic.
I live on the New Madrid fault, below a huge impoundment.
...
of radioactive mine tailings wherein dwell mutated superbacteria...
 
What makes you think the only evidence is from the Canary islands, or that such events have not occurred in recent times circa 1500AD on the Australian coast
 
I remember similar claims regarding Hawaii, including the identification of the site of a possible past landslide.

Bear in mind that **** happens. The longer a species lingers around, the higher will be the odds a major **** will happen around its times. If human species lives long enough, it will be submitted to supervolcano eruptions, massive tsunamis, asteroid impacts, etc.

This put, I would, before entering the OMG! WE'RE SO SCREWED! mode, I would check for evidence. According to the documentaries I've seen, and IIRC them, there are indeed evidences of major tsunamis on eastern and western North America. OK... But are massive landslides on vocanic islands the only possible sources for these tsunamis? No. In the eastern shoreline, for example, lanslides at the continental shelve and the odd earthquake (close and far away) are also possible. In case of doubt, ask the Portuguese who lived in Lisbon in 1755 and Google for Grand Banks earthquake. The western shoreline, this one we already know its earthquake-induced tsunami risks.

So, what should you guys do if a tsunami register can actually be linked to a volcanic island collapse? Enter the OMG WE'RE SO SCREWED mode? No. First remember that for the megatsunami to happen, besides the computer models being right, some other circunstances are needed- an eruption must happen when the mountain is wet due to rains and the collapse must be sudden, happening at once. A whole moutainside creeping towards the sea for weeks, days or hours will be no case for worries. Episodic small collapses will cause small tsunamis, however.

Where do you go from here? I don't know! The ball is in the government's field, for good or for bad. Lets suppose your government thinks the risk is real. Real-time slope and sesimicity monitoring programs, evacuation plans and tsunami barriers would be created. The size of the barriers (as well as the areas to be evacuated) would depend on the calculated most likely maximum size of the waves and the economics of the required constructions. Here's a guess, straight out of the rear end of my disgestive system. The most likely wave is 5 meters high? OK. Barriers are buildable for a long stretch of the coast. 10 meters? Just around key assets. 30 meters? Pray the IPU it never comes or that it comes only after you manage to have a really good long-term forecast.
 
The thing missing from the Canary Island scenario is that the distance attenuation component of the wave seemed to be missing.
 
The thing missing from the Canary Island scenario is that the distance attenuation component of the wave seemed to be missing.
I think you might need to review the 12-26-04 Indian Ocean Tsunami.

These mega-disasters are unlikely in any one person's lifetime but 100% likely in some person's lifetime, if that makes sense. Not something to keep one from living in Florida or in the Cascadia Subduction Zone where I live, but not something I would dismiss altogether.
 
Last edited:
The thing missing from the Canary Island scenario is that the distance attenuation component of the wave seemed to be missing.

That was my first thought - the inverse square law (if that's right?).

The Japanese tsunami was born of a very long fracture - some 300 miles long IIRC - that was close to the coast. The Canary volcano is much smaller and distant from major population centres.

But don't quote me ;)
 
The OP sure seemed snarky to me. Perhaps it was missing a few sarcasm icons?

I get the snark; the program is another version of "things the general public needs to worry about so that we (in the broadcast media) can keep our jobs."

There is already a lot to worry about. Manufacturing more worry via reminders of possible or probable natural disasters is just annoying.:yikes:
 
We are so doomed.
I'd like to see a top ten list of our doomed-ness.
But I guess it would be off topic.
I live on the New Madrid fault, below a huge impoundment.

Quarky, my inlaws live in NE Arkansas, near the New Madrid. We have farmland near there that has sand blows from the last earthquake. Where do you live?
 
Not to mention the effect on tsunami of trenches in the sea floor, which help dissipate some of the energy when the wave passes over them. I don't know the mapping of the ocean floor between the suggested landslide and the Atlantic Coast, but that would certainly have an effect.

In a somewhat related note, there are these "rogue waves" of extremely large size that appear to occur infrequently but not rarely in the open ocean. IIRC a recent survey of satellite data indicated that these waves, whose cause is still not understood well, were found to be much more frequent than had previously been suspected. Yet these waves are not striking shore--ergo, they are deteriorating en route.

A large enough seismic event, or a big landslide, certainly *can* trigger a tsunami; but the reason we have the Pacific tsunami warning system buoys in place is that so far we can't determine the factors that separate "can" from "will".

I rather enjoy the "We Could All Die Tomorrow" disaster scare-umentaries on Discovery and the Beeb. Sometimes they have useful information, and they can always lead to a good discussion with the kids. But I don't lose sleep over them, either.

I live in the Pacific Northwest, so my disaster-could-happen is a big earthquake. I am not in tsunami risk, but the chance for loss of power, natural gas leaks, disruption of communication and building collapses, road destruction, etc. of a major quake is ever present. Other than having a family plan for natural disaster and supplies to get through the critical first 3 to 5 days, there's not a lot that can or should be done.

Just my thoughts, MK
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom