• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Forged Iraqi Letters: Conspiracy kept secret for years just like 9/11.

twoofer

New Blood
T
Joined
May 14, 2008
Messages
24
Seems like the Bush administration has fooled us (U.S.) again just like 9/11. Shame on us for believing him. Shame on those who still do. My brothers have died in Iraq for nothing. The government's 9/11 conspiracy theory has as many holes if not more than the government's "WMD" conspiracy theory. Wake up and smell the truth not the BS.
 
twoofer said:
Seems like the Bush administration has fooled us (U.S.) again just like 9/11. Shame on us for believing him. Shame on those who still do. My brothers have died in Iraq for nothing. The government's 9/11 conspiracy theory has as many holes if not more than the government's "WMD" conspiracy theory. Wake up and smell the truth not the BS.
Click to expand...

Ok. Thanks. :rolleyes:
 
I say "I told you so!" to all who said this administration is incapable of having a conspiracy against the American people and to keep it a secret for so long! HA! Yes they can.
 
twoofer said:
I say "I told you so!" to all who said this administration is incapable of having a conspiracy against the American people and to keep it a secret for so long! HA! Yes they can.
Click to expand...
Twoofer, would you like to let everyone know what the hell you're talking about?
 
twoofer said:
I say "I told you so!" to all who said this administration is incapable of having a conspiracy against the American people and to keep it a secret for so long! HA! Yes they can.
Click to expand...


Hey guys a book came out that makes wild accusations. Nothing to support it but HAHAHA THIS PROVES YOU WERE WRONG ALL ALONG!! That'll teach you to think critically instead of immediately taking any piece of evidence which supports your position and hailing it as indisputable proof.

Pffft, "skeptics." :rolleyes:
 
taking any piece of evidence which supports your position and hailing it as indisputable proof.

this goes for both sides :)
 
few who still believe in the conspiracy theory

Hmm... seems like there are a few who still believe in the conspiracy theory of WMD's in Iraq. To the believers of this conspiracy: Sorry but you were told lies. Start understanding this truth.
 
Twoofer, first of all let me say that I am sorry to hear of your brothers' deaths in Iraq.

Second, would you like to make a detailed argument? That can be more helpful, and convincing, than brief declarations.
 
twoofer said:
Hmm... seems like there are a few who still believe in the conspiracy theory of WMD's in Iraq. To the believers of this conspiracy: Sorry but you were told lies. Start understanding this truth.
Click to expand...

Many people here not only do NOT 'believe in the conspiracy there of WMD's in Iraq', but were against the invasion in the first place. Many of us are no fans of Bush. The difference between us and you is that we don't let ideology get in the way of critical thinking.

Most of us don't believe 911 was an inside job because the facts don't support it.
 
And how many people were involved in the "forged letters" incident? 10? 12? And how many would have had to have been involved in "9/11"? 1,000? 2,000?

:boggled:
 
That the administration uncritically accepted and promoted anything that said what they wanted to hear- or even promoted the fabrication of evidence- just shows that they aren't any smarter or more honest than the average paranoid conspiracy theorist.

That twoofer claims that some of their "evidence" being bogus is proof of the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy Fantasy shows that the Bush administration are his intellectual and moral peers.

What an astonishing victory for Da Twoof.
 
fabricating evidence and using fox news as a propaganda tool doesn't make them smart or dumb, it just helps prove an agenda. That is something that is not viewed here.
 
Gord_in_Toronto said:
And how many people were involved in the "forged letters" incident? 10? 12? And how many would have had to have been involved in "9/11"? 1,000? 2,000?

:boggled:
Click to expand...

Not that many. I remember reading some theory that as few as 19 men, plus a couple of planners and financiers, could have pulled it off.
 
skepticalcriticalguy said:
Not that many. I remember reading some theory that as few as 19 men, plus a couple of planners and financiers, could have pulled it off.
Click to expand...


19? That's not very many people to set hundreds of thousands of pounds of explosive charges, direct the FBI, NTSB, and every member of congress to look the other way, and sprinkle fake airplane parts across three different crash sites. :p
 
And how many people were involved in the "forged letters" incident? 10? 12? And how many would have had to have been involved in "9/11"? 1,000? 2,000?
Click to expand...

No, at least 2,000 would be needed for the Pentagon attack alone, to man the "flyover jet", to craft the fake damage on the light poles, to truck them out there the night before 9/11 and plant them by the roadside (except for one pole that would have be put on the road and simulated as a taxi impact, whose driver would have to be "in on it"), to collect AA757 debris from unknown sources (but bearing the right serial numbers to fool those not "in on it") and craft damage on them to simulate the kind of damage expected, to scatter aircraft debris on the lawn and to plant debris ahead of time in trailers in front of the building or hidden inside of the building (including larger debris like landing gears and engines), to pose as fake "witnesses" after the attacks to attest to the plane hitting the building, to plant the real bombs inside of the building that would simulate the impact, to take about a hundred human bodies and chop them up to resemble passengers on the plane that would be found by recovery workers in the form of "human hamburger", to falsify the DNA testing that concluded that these body parts corresponded to actual passengers on the flight, to fabricate data on a flight data recorder from a plane that never crashed into the building, to get the pilot of the C-130 to perform some manouvers over the Pentagon as a distraction (or maybe he was the remote pilot of the "flyover jet"), and of course all the personnel that would be needed to plan and apportion the funds for the operation, prep the "flyover jet", and manage to "disappear" the real AA77 somewhere over West Virginia, and similarly to get rid of the "flyover" jet by landing it somewhere that would either not be noticed or where the people were "in on it" as well.

Nah, I'm pretty sure they would need more than 2,000 people for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom