• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The fallacy of compliant walking

barehl

Master Poster
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
2,655
-Feel free to attach this to another thread-

I got tired of seeing fake science and convoluted logic in the PG thread. So, I have a reply.

Homo sapiens is the only mammal on planet Earth that habitually and efficiently walks upright. Humans can run marathons and walk for thousands of miles as they routinely do on the Appalachian, Pacific Crest, and Continental Divide trails every year. Humans do walk in the most efficient way possible as you would expect after 3 million years of evolution. Some other primates can walk short distances upright. However, because their hips are designed for things like climbing trees and knuckle walking, they can't fully straighten their legs and therefore walk compliantly. The only other primate that can stand upright is the orangutan but even they cannot walk efficiently.

When people scrutinized the PG film, they noticed that sometimes the Pattysuit figure has bent knees. Walking with bent knees is a common side-effect when men use lifts. Try it yourself. Get other men to try it and you'll see that this is true. Or you could look at this video of young men trying to walk in high heels. Skip to 2:36. Note the distinctly bent knees. If you are wearing a suit and trying to make yourself taller, lifts are an understandable option.

However, for those who desperately wanted a big, scary teddybear creature, the bent knee became proof that it wasn't human. However, this created a problem because how could someone argue that the crippled gait of other primates fits with an animal that normally walks upright? The answer was relabeling. No, it was asserted; compliant walking isn't the gait of something designed for other forms of locomotion, rather it is actually superior to the human gait. It was claimed that the bent knee cushioned the bones and allowed a longer stride and increased walking efficiency without all that vertical motion.

The problem though is that none of this is true. In third world countries, heavy loads are commonly carried on the head. When you do this it is essential that you minimize vertical motion. Various people have studied this and it has been shown over and over to be more efficient than carrying loads on the back. If the PG claims were true then you would expect these people to use a compliant walk to gain that vaunted bigfoot walking efficiency. Unfortunately, none of them do. The vertical motion is prevented by wiggling the hips, not by walking with bent knees.

Here is a video of a woman carrying a heavy load on her head. She's been doing this her whole life so she is far more of an expert than the bigfoot crowd on efficient walking. Skip to 1:05 and pause the video as she walks. You'll see that both of her legs are straight when they are under her. So much for claimed superiority and necessity of compliant walking.

This is the difference between real science and feel-good folklore. Science can be demonstrated; you can see it with your own eyes. Try it and you get the same result. With folklore, you can beg, you can pound the table, or you can get insulting; but the one thing you can never actually do is demonstrate it.

Compliant walking for bigfoot is a myth.
 
Last edited:
Excellent post with excellent points, but the two links go to the same video of guys wearing heels.
 
Excellent post with excellent points, but the two links go to the same video of guys wearing heels.

Thank you. It's fixed now.

While I'm at it I might as well give an example of the difference between naiive observation and critical investigation. My nephew posted a link to a video showing a Pitts Special flying sideways right next to a Lamborghini Gallardo. It looks really impressive.

However, I would say that the car is a kit. And I would say that the aircraft is a giant scale RC, mostly likely a JR Folien design. In fact, I would say that the aircraft is this one. You can see in the comments though that people assume it is a real aircraft with a pilot inside.
 
Last edited:
Bob Heironimus said he was wearing cowboy boots in the suit, and most cowboy boots have tall heels.

Please tag this thread with 'bigfoot'.
Thanks
 
Doesn't the surface you are walking on also determine if you tend toward bent knees?

I have been told that the reason the Asimo robot walks with knees bent is because it allows for stability and keeps the center of mass above the feet. Here is a video of the robot:



The result is that the robot doesn't fall over if the leading foot doesn't gain purchase - the trailing foot, with bent knee, is stable enough to support the torso. If I were walking on uncertain ground - as in the woods with branches, stones, or whatever underfoot - I very well might use the "bent knees" gait.

Not a fan of bigfoot and not a kinesiologist, just offering another viewpoint.
 
Bob Heironimus said he was wearing cowboy boots in the suit, and most cowboy boots have tall heels.

Please tag this thread with 'bigfoot'.
Thanks
I added the tag.

The lowest heel for women is the kitten heel which is 2". Apparently most women can walk in them without any trouble. Cowboy boots designed for walking have a 1" heel like most shoes. Those made for riding are usually 2". But apparently some men have trouble walking even with the 2" heel so there is also one in between at 1 1/2" or 1 5/8". It doesn't seem like it would take much under the heel inside the suit foot to get the bent leg. Also, I believe the bent leg is to leave travel room in the joint.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't the surface you are walking on also determine if you tend toward bent knees?
I suppose it would effect the gait under some circumstances but presumably that would also effect the speed of the walk.

I have been told that the reason the Asimo robot walks with knees bent is because it allows for stability and keeps the center of mass above the feet. Here is a video of the robot:

Asimo has a very unnatural gait due to the lack of hip movement. It can pivot the thigh forward and backward or in and out. But, there is no moving hip structure at all, either up and down or forward and back. This causes a very awkward swaying when walking as you can see with this video.
 
Last edited:
Doesn't the surface you are walking on also determine if you tend toward bent knees?

I have been told that the reason the Asimo robot walks with knees bent is because it allows for stability and keeps the center of mass above the feet. Here is a video of the robot:



The result is that the robot doesn't fall over if the leading foot doesn't gain purchase - the trailing foot, with bent knee, is stable enough to support the torso. If I were walking on uncertain ground - as in the woods with branches, stones, or whatever underfoot - I very well might use the "bent knees" gait.

Not a fan of bigfoot and not a kinesiologist, just offering another viewpoint.

You had me going for a few seconds because at first I thought you were talking about A.w.e.s.o.m.-o!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a-5XeJ1iXM
 
Thank you for the wonderful thread, barehl. "Patty" doesn't even do "the walk" for the entire PGF.

I wear boots with ~2" heel maybe once a week. Yes, it's quite awkward to walk in them with straight knee.

The only other efficient two legged walkers are some of the flightless birds.
Even fully flightless birds walk with a completely different gait than ours. They are way up on their toes with knees bent. As far as I can tell, human bipedal walking has evolved only twice in the history of life on earth:in hominins and sleestaks.
 
Mammals walk with the gait that they're built for. Humans are made to walk with mainly a straight leg, so that's how people walk. Assuming that Bigfoot would walk the same way is a mistake.

Such a small difference in the knee bend could be natural for an animal that isn't built the same as us. Basically, just because regular humans don't walk with a compliant gait doesn't mean that other upright primates won't.
 
Last edited:
Mammals walk with the gait that they're built for. Humans are made to walk with mainly a straight leg, so that's how people walk. Assuming that Bigfoot would walk the same way is a mistake.

Such a small difference in the knee bend could be natural for an animal that isn't built the same as us. Basically, just because regular humans don't walk with a compliant gait doesn't mean that other upright primates won't.

...because GMO, right?
 
Doesn't the surface you are walking on also determine if you tend toward bent knees?

...If I were walking on uncertain ground - as in the woods with branches, stones, or whatever underfoot - I very well might use the "bent knees" gait.

Carlos Castaneda describes moving through the desert very swiftly in the dark by using a kind of 'marching' technique where the legs were kept bent to help avoid tripping over obstacles...
 
Carlos Castaneda describes moving through the desert very swiftly in the dark by using a kind of 'marching' technique where the legs were kept bent to help avoid tripping over obstacles...

Yes, walking that way causes your lower leg to "give" more in the event it hits an object, or goes into a hole.

You are less likely to trip and fall, and less likely to suffer an injury to your knee or ankle.
 
Yes, walking that way causes your lower leg to "give" more in the event it hits an object, or goes into a hole.

You are less likely to trip and fall, and less likely to suffer an injury to your knee or ankle.

It also lowers your center of gravity.
 
I'm 6'7" and discovered about 20 years ago that a compliant gait helps me to carry a heavy load, for example a packing box full of books.

If I were to carry that box on my head, I would walk upright with legs straight. But that's not how men carry boxes in my culture, so instead when burdened with a box of whatever, I often opt to use a compliant, knees-bent gait.

It seems intuitive to me that a man would employ this gait to distribute the weight of, say, a padded ape suit. Others disagree. The world may never know. /shrug
 
When I'm running at night where there's limited/no lighting, I run with what would approximate a compliant gait to compensate for unseen dips and bumps in the road surface.

It seems to work, but is more fatiguing that my normal running gait.
 

Back
Top Bottom