The Ethics of Terrorism

[values]

Edited by Darat: 

Content removed for breach of Rule 3.

 

[Complexity]

Sigh... Another classification scheme that will save the world.

This isn't "technology", although it certainly may be considered spam.

 

[eri]

Values, this is the fifth time you've posted something like this, isn't it?

 

[values]

Complexity?

What do you mean another scheme ?

Got any examples ?

Guess I'll have to chalk you up to both the complacent AND the provincial...

JLM

 

[Soapy Sam]

Hey, John D.!. Sign me up too.
I'm right up there with the radical chic of complacent provincialism.
I like to be in all the cool new movements.

 

[The Don]

If you missed them, the old threads are

here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43578 19th August
here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43545 20th August
here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43489 21st August
and here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43577 21st August

 

[Complexity]

values - Do your own work.

Yours is only one of several attempts at classification.

This stuff is old and has never been well done.

 

[KingMerv00]

Darat removed it. What was it?

 

[ImaginalDisc]

I've got to say, I'm curious too. rules 3 is apearantly "You will not post any commercial advertisements." What did the OP offer to do, buy terrorists wholesale?

 

[a_unique_person]

The Don has the links. You aren't missing much.

 

[Complexity]

values was linking to a book that he had written on his values "technology".

I mentioned that it looked like spam.

He apparently has done this before and been warned about it.