sesmo_k
single space
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2005
- Messages
- 196
I do some voluntary work for Youth Offender Panels in the UK. Basically these panels try to rehabilitate children who commit criminal offences between the ages of 10-17. The offence must be the childs first offence and they must have pleaded guilty to it. They are given referrals to a panel by magistrates. I have been a part of these panels for a few years now and for the most part if has been rewarding work. Over the time they have been going, the recidivism rate has dropped to 10%, before Youth Offender Panels were used in my area, the recidivism rate was more like 40% from the sentences and conditions imposed by the magistrates.
Recently though I was involved in a panel where the young person was accused of a fairly innocuous crime (stealing a small value item). The young person then had to come to review meetings once a month for three months. On the third month the young person did not attend the panel meeting, the reason... they were being held in a Young Offenders Institute. This person is 10 years old. I cannot release infomation about the second offence as it is rightly confidential, but I can't help but think that locking up a 10 year old (whatever they have done) is not the way to be treating children in a civilised society. Surely, secure centres (as exist in the UK) are a far more useful commodity to treat the youngest people. If they had committed their misdemeanors a few months earlier they wouldn't have even been charged (the age of criminal responsibilty is 10 in the UK).
I firmly believe that criminals should be punished, I also think that the prison system in the UK can be far too lax, but incarcerating a 10 year old with others much older (up to 17) is surely not the right way to go about things.
Thoughts?
Recently though I was involved in a panel where the young person was accused of a fairly innocuous crime (stealing a small value item). The young person then had to come to review meetings once a month for three months. On the third month the young person did not attend the panel meeting, the reason... they were being held in a Young Offenders Institute. This person is 10 years old. I cannot release infomation about the second offence as it is rightly confidential, but I can't help but think that locking up a 10 year old (whatever they have done) is not the way to be treating children in a civilised society. Surely, secure centres (as exist in the UK) are a far more useful commodity to treat the youngest people. If they had committed their misdemeanors a few months earlier they wouldn't have even been charged (the age of criminal responsibilty is 10 in the UK).
I firmly believe that criminals should be punished, I also think that the prison system in the UK can be far too lax, but incarcerating a 10 year old with others much older (up to 17) is surely not the right way to go about things.
Thoughts?