• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

“Sybil Exposed”: Memory, lies and therapy

Gord_in_Toronto

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
26,474
Review of Sybil Exposed by Debbie Nathan.

Salon, Sunday, Oct 16, 2011 2:00 PM

How three women fabricated the most famous case of multiple personality disorder and damaged thousands of lives


Debbie Nathan’s Sybil Exposed is about psychiatric fads, outrageous therapeutic malpractice, thwarted ambition run amok, and several other subjects, but above all, it is a book about a book. Specifically, that book is “Sybil,” purportedly the true story of a woman with 16 personalities. First published in 1973, “Sybil” remains in print after selling over 6 million copies in the U.S. alone.

http://www.salon.com/2011/10/16/sybil_exposed_memory_lies_and_therapy/

What should be the final chapter to this sad and horrifying nonsense. And yet -- 1.2 million hits on Google. But, at least, the False Memory Syndrome Foundation gets the tops spots.

:th:
 
I started a thread about Sybil a couple of years ago and attached some other research I'm looking forward to reading this book very much!
 
Tks for the heads-up

"Sybil" was exposed years ago. And MPD relegated to the fringes, where it belongs.

Still, this should be a very interesting book. Especially if there happens to be any new info to add to the story.
 
Has the same debunking been done on The Three Faces of Eve? There were only three personalities in that case: Eve White, Eve Black and Jane (all pseudonyms). So is there any truth at all to multiple personalities?
 
I never read/watched the actual "Sybil" book/movie this is describing, apart from about thirty seconds watching on TV when my dad changed the channel, saying it's depressing. But that description in the article sounds an awful lot like how my junior high school counselor treated me, taking the anxiety, depression, and anger I experienced from severe bullying and trying to get me to tell her about a problem at home that must be the cause, either because she simply didn't want to believe my peers were doing such awful things, or less charitably, because she didn't want to deal with the hassle of actually getting things done or getting hers and the school's name tarnished during police interactions, so she had me shift the blame to my sister, which really made me guilty when I realized what I had done to increase the rifts, and to believe it was all my fault and setting really bad behavior patterns like distrust of psychologists/counselors to the point I frequently lie and change things around and am almost totally unreliable when speaking to such people.

This kind of thing really is sick. It is horrible when you discover how pliable your mind really is, when you thought yourself so smart and strong in will that as a youngster you'd blame domestic abuse victims for not simply shouting you won't tolerate abuse and leaving, such that you take it as some kind of karmic punishment. Can't stand that "just world" &(^^) anymore. I did a presentation about multiple personality disorder for health class in high school. AFAIK there are legitimate cases, but are exceptionally rare, is now called dissociative identity disorder, which I think has broader subcategories to include dissociative problems other than having distinct "alters", which is basically a maladaptive form of dissociation coping mechanisms, more common in people who experienced trauma like chronic sexual abuse. I can't specifically attest to the validity of the "distinct personalities" form of it, though, as I do not recall the evidence behind it. Oh, and of course multiple personalities is different from schizophrenia, where teh "split" and "mind" come from observed disruptions in cognition, not from the idea of separate personalities in the person switching, but can see where the confusion arises due to people hearing voices and conversing.
 
I've now read the book and was pretty impressed with it. The author's tone is very angry, so angry in fact that I was worried that she was anti-psychiatry in principal. However, she is a reliable journalist with a good track record. She's just so angry about this horrible story.

She tracks the histories of all three of the players, "Sybil" or Shirley Mason, Dr. Cornelia Wilbur, and Flora Rheta Schreiber, who wrote the original book.

There are a number of very sad situations in the book, but to me the saddest is that Mason's symptoms when she started match those of pernicious anemia. Indeed, when treated with hogs liver shots, a common treatment for anemia at the time, she got better. If she had continued with treatment for that condition, while still quite young, chances are she could have had a normal life.

What is really infuriating is that Schreiber and Wilbur had no compunction at all about lying. Sybil's mother was not diagnosed as a schizophrenic at the Mayo clinic, as is clearly stated in the book. Indeed, the slanders against "Mrs. Dorsett" are extreme. There is no evidence of the horrifying sexual and physical abuse depicted in the book.

Mason eventually became so dependent on Wilbur that she was creating new personalities to keep the relationship going. With a good psychiatrist, she could have been weaned off the treatment and the drugs Wilbur was filling her with, and been given a chance at life. Wilbur, instead, cashed in on her "favorite" patient.

Finally, the sad ending to this sad tale is that just as Mason was starting to lead a normal life, working as a teacher and art therapist, living in her own apartment in Kentucky, and developing friends and relationships, the book was published and cut her off from the world. She was forced by Wilbur and Schreiber to abandon her friends, even childhood friends, for fear they would out her as Sybil. She became depressed and unable to live independently, finally in effect living with Wilbur until Wilbur's death.

What really became a folie a deux was treated as reality, cashed in on by two publicity and money hungry women, and thwarted any chance of normality for a frail and very sad woman.
 
I remember the movie also...it was very moving. And presented as totally true. To me at a young age, this was "wow this could HAPPEN" For many many years I believed children of abuse would invent these alternative personalities to protect themselves. It was "common knowledge" after the book came out.
 
I remember the movie also...it was very moving. And presented as totally true. To me at a young age, this was "wow this could HAPPEN" For many many years I believed children of abuse would invent these alternative personalities to protect themselves. It was "common knowledge" after the book came out.

I think that was what upset me the most, that they kept insisting upon the truth of the story, even when it harmed other people.
 
Thanks for the review LL!

I don't think I could have actually read the book considering what I already know about story. :(
 
I read "Sybil" multiple times as a teenager and believed it to be true. I also read a book on autism, which I believe was called "Dibs: in search of self" which basically blamed the kid's autism on a cold and distant mother (also disproved). I knew "Sybil" had been discredited - I think I'll pick up this book, sounds interesting.
 
I read over a decade ago about how "Sybil" was bogus although with this book perhaps the general public will find out also.
 

Back
Top Bottom