Chad Noles
Muse
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2001
- Messages
- 534
http://story.news.yahoo.com/fc?cid=34&tmpl=fc&in=US&cat=Affirmative_Action
Ok,has the Supreme Courts ruling made it clear that race can be used as a factor in admitting students to universities and colleges?Now,quotas are taboo,but racial preference is ok?You can use minority race as a plus in evaluating applicants for a college admission,but not descrimination.Exact numbers or percentages of ethnic groups is an unlawful practice in admissions policy.Yet to have a more diverse ethnic culture,some in the majority may be left out.
It seems as if the Court has legalized
vague and arbirtary standards for universities to use as long as they are not openly obvious about them.Can anyone else see my confusion as to where there is any clairty in these rulings?Are we left with a simular Court ruling on pornography"I can't say what it is,but I know it when I see it"?
Ok,has the Supreme Courts ruling made it clear that race can be used as a factor in admitting students to universities and colleges?Now,quotas are taboo,but racial preference is ok?You can use minority race as a plus in evaluating applicants for a college admission,but not descrimination.Exact numbers or percentages of ethnic groups is an unlawful practice in admissions policy.Yet to have a more diverse ethnic culture,some in the majority may be left out.
It seems as if the Court has legalized
vague and arbirtary standards for universities to use as long as they are not openly obvious about them.Can anyone else see my confusion as to where there is any clairty in these rulings?Are we left with a simular Court ruling on pornography"I can't say what it is,but I know it when I see it"?