Skeptical Greg
Agave Wine Connoisseur
David Swidler suggested this might be the subject of a new thread as we discussed it here...
I had said:
" I know there is a lot of tap dancing around the idea that God causes suffering as opposed to ' letting it happen ', you know , free will and all that.. "
To which David replied:
I had said:
" I know there is a lot of tap dancing around the idea that God causes suffering as opposed to ' letting it happen ', you know , free will and all that.. "
To which David replied:
Oh, I wouldn't say it's tap dancing. It's a logical consequence of such a belief system. For existence to have meaning - one of the goals of belief - then human actions must have real consequences. There has to be real suffering, or we might as well be playing some game. Going with the Western idea of an omnipotent, benevolent God, such a God would have to "restrain himself" from preventing all suffering, undermining the larger goal of the "greater good," which is making human existence meaningful (this thread is hardly the place to explore that; feel free to start a new thread).