Still more reports on TAM4, from a newbie

HawkeyeMD

Critical Thinker
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
269
This will be the first thread I've started, 'cause I'm new. But I'm posting some thoughts over on livejournal, and I wanted to put them here too. I've really enjoyed reading over what other people thought of the same things I saw, so maybe another viewpoint is okay.

First and foremost, though, I want to THANK ALL THE DONORS WHO SENT ME TO THIS EVENT. I sent a thank-you email immediately to the office, which is the medium I was advised to use, but particularly after the fabulous time I had, I want to reiterate: you guys are fantastic. I made a point, on the first day after Mr. Randi asked us to stand up as he ackowledged the amazingly generous people who had sent more than 40--more than 40!! of us to TAM4, to find him later and say "I was one of those people, I wouldn't be here without those donors, and thank you for making the public announcement. I know it means a lot when you say it." (And may he soon be feeling 100% and back to his usual sparkling self. (I'm gonna be sending personal emails to as many of the donors as I can find, but things have been a little busy lately. I'm a medical student.)

Okay, so, Las Vegas. Due to a missed flight, I arrived around midnight. At the risk of offending anyone who a) lives there or b) chooses to go there on vacation, this place is, um...not my idea of heaven on earth. *g* The Stardust Hotel is actually a little more restrained than most, from what I saw, but you still have to get through that mouse-maze of glittering, ringing, flashing machines just to get to the front desk. And there, at midnight, were lots and lots of bleary-eyed Midwestern types stolidly shoveling in all their money like so many trained rats. Brrrrrr. I wouldn't have minded so much if it had looked like they were having fun. (But it didn't.)

Side note? I was *so* disappointed to find that the slot machines no longer have LEVERS, for heaven's sakes. All you do now is push a button. Which, I'm told, is much more efficient. But no FUN!!! I was bummed.
So the hotel was fine, as soon as I got up to my room. (Oh--and I was amazed at how you can play the slots at the airport and Keno on the TV in your room. Wouldn't want anyone to miss an opportunity to lose their money!) And bright-and-early the following morning, off I went to the conference, where our first speaker was the inimitable Christopher Hitchens.

Actually, I met him in the lobby as he was on his way into the conference, where he snorted majestically upon finding out that I and the person I was talking to at the time were from New York. "New York? Bloomberg? I don't know how you people live with yourselves." To which I could only reply, "Don't look at me. *I* didn't vote for him." But actually, in person, he was extremely polite and gracious in that peculiarly British way. Which didn't stop him from giving a deliciously sardonic speech. He introduced his new book about Thomas Jefferson, and because the overall topic of the conference was Science and Politics, he tailored his remarks to Jefferson's views on the separation of church and state, and also touched on the Sally Hemings revelations. He stops shy of being an apologist--he actually said something to the effect of "It would have been far more admirable had Jefferson had the courage of his convictions on slavery rather than leaving the question for the next generation"--but he also acknowledged that historical context is important.

Hitchens is a very intelligent man, and you're never going to catch him out on factual knowledge. I was impressed with his answers to questions from the audience. He didn't rant at people, and when he *didn't* know the answer to something he had no problem saying as much. (This is rarer than one would like amongst pundits.) He gave an interesting and entertaining talk, and I was slightly disappointed that the Jefferson book was already sold out by the time I got to the sales table. I got another of his essay collections instead, and while I certainly don't agree with everything he says and thinks, I respect the fact that he absolutely does his research and knows his stuff. He does have his opinions, though. *g*

Next up: Michael Shermer! Watch this space.
 
I'm drunk. This is too much to re4ad ight now. so shut up/.

Um. I think I'll take this in the spirit in which I'm sure it was intended. Therefore:

You don't get to tell me to shut up! Unless you're buying.

I wil reas it omorow.

Well?

Welcome, HawkeyeMD. Great post. Look forward to the next one on Shermer.

Thank you! Coming soon, I promise. Also Murray Gell-Mann!

Hawkeye
 
Hi, HawkEye! I saw Mr. Hitchens soon after I arrived at TAM; he was sitting at a lunch counter of the Stardust Cafe and looked like he was working on something, so I didn't bother him. He's soooo brilliant I'm a bit intimidated by him, but maybe if I got to speak with him I would feel more at ease. HawkEye, I'm glad you're here!
 
Speaking of ..., great line in your sig, isn't it?

Oh, it *rocked*. Hence my shameless quotation of it. So true, so sadly true.
:boggled:

MLynn said:
He's soooo brilliant I'm a bit intimidated by him, but maybe if I got to speak with him I would feel more at ease. HawkEye, I'm glad you're here!

I understand the feeling, but you should've, you really should've. He's quite amusing in person.

Thank you for the greeting!
 
What was the context?

He said he had first been involved with "committees" in the second grade, and from there through high school, college, university faculty, and science-advisory boards under any number of presidents.

He was commenting on the similarity. *g*
 

Back
Top Bottom