• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Steven Jones, Just Making Stuff Up...

DaN K. StAnLeY

Muse
DaN K. StAnLeY
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
836
Hey everyone,
Just thought I'd post a heads up. I heard Steven Jones talking on the Alex Jones Show about a "secret" new developement that will blow the 9/11 investigation wide open.

He said that he and others ( I assume Gage, Ryan, etc..) are looking into a "high-tech, military grade, SUPER Thermite"

No I'm not kidding. I didn't get the audio unfortunately, but I expect we'll be hearing about it soon. Apparently, it blows up as well as cuts metal. Guess thay had to cover that old inconsistency up, huh?

Anyone ever heard of a military grade "super-Thermite?"
 
I think he's talking about this:

174000.jpg


That's slide 174 from Version 5.1 of AE911Truth's Powerpoint.
 
Well, if it "blows up" it's not going to stick around long enough to do the traditional thermitic metal-melting business. So why not use much better - and proven - shaped charges and do away with the speculative thermite theory. Oh yes .. thermite is such a cool word ... I forgot ...

So it sounds like a load of horse manure. But perhaps it would be wiser to wait for the final pearls of 'peer-reviewed' wisdom from Prof. Jones et al before being too dismissive. :boxedin:
 
Yes, there's plenty of time to dismiss him after he casts his final pearls before we the great unwashed.
 
Steven Jones is fully aware of the glaring inconsistencies in his claims and is just trying to have it both ways. For example, as evidence of thermite/thermate use, he says...

1.) The towers fell at free-fall speed. But something like this would require EXPLOSIVES (not an incendiary) to be placed on each floor.

2.) Steel columns were ejected horizontally hundreds of feet. Again, an incendiary like thermite would not do this.

3.) The pulverization of concrete. Of course, even explosives wouldn't do this, but an incendiary CERTAINLY wouldn't do it. (By the way, last night I noticed something for the first time. The "pulling" of WTC6 created a plume of pulverized concrete, even though no one suspects that explosives were used on WTC6.)

Jones is just trying to stick to his thermite claim while being able to say that it was explosive, explaining (in the minds of the truthers), the free-fall speed and so on. Of course, this just raises more problems... namely, why these explosions weren't picked up by the cameras or seismographs.
 
Last edited:
Next will be Jones's discovery of super-mega-ULTRA~! thermite. This will be the stuff that his truthist non-sheeple followers always talk about... it functions simultaneously as an incendiary and explosive, it morphs from thermite to thermate and back, and it keeps working as an incendiary for weeks after ignition.
 
Maybe he's working his way towards a grand unified theory involving Super Nano-Thermite, Cold Fusion and Jesus visiting the Mayans.

There's no way the scientific world could continue to ignore him after that!
 
Something Jason Bermas brought up was, " there was molten material under WTC 1, 2, 7, and even 6"....Hmmm......

So was WTC 6 brought down by CD now too? He does say that there were " hotspots under 1,2,7,and 6 as well."
 
RKOwens4 said:
Steven Jones is fully aware of the glaring inconsistencies in his claims and is just trying to have it both ways. For example, as evidence of thermite/thermate use, he says...

1.) The towers fell at free-fall speed. But something like this would require EXPLOSIVES (not an incendiary) to be placed on each floor.

2.) Steel columns were ejected horizontally hundreds of feet. Again, an incendiary like thermite would not do this.

3.) The pulverization of concrete. Of course, even explosives wouldn't do this, but an incendiary CERTAINLY wouldn't do it. (By the way, last night I noticed something for the first time. The "pulling" of WTC6 created a plume of pulverized concrete, even though no one suspects that explosives were used on WTC6.)

Jones is just trying to stick to his thermite claim while being able to say that it was explosive, explaining (in the minds of the truthers), the free-fall speed and so on. Of course, this just raises more problems... namely, why these explosions weren't picked up by the cameras or seismographs.
Click to expand...

Shhhhhhhh!!!!! That's supposed to be a secret!!!!:cool:
 
Brainache said:
Maybe he's working his way towards a grand unified theory involving Super Nano-Thermite, Cold Fusion and Jesus visiting the Mayans.

There's no way the scientific world could continue to ignore him after that!
Click to expand...

....especially those scientists specializing in the field of abnormal psychology.:p
 
Steven Jones is making stuff up?

What's next, you'll tell me Jason Bermas needs braces?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom