headscratcher4
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2002
- Messages
- 7,776
Dancing David said:The biggest problem I see with time travel is the intrinsic motion of the earth, the sun and the galaxy. Sure you could go back in time(I doubt it) but then you would need an intergalactic spaceship to get back to the earth.
Peace
Dancing David said:The biggest problem I see with time travel is the intrinsic motion of the earth, the sun and the galaxy. Sure you could go back in time(I doubt it) but then you would need an intergalactic spaceship to get back to the earth.
Peace
Dr. Popalot said:If time travel were possible then why aren't time travelers form the future here now? Think how financialy successful they would be if the knew what the stock market was going to do, which sports team was going to win, etc.
Dr. Popalot said:If time travel were possible then why aren't time travelers form the future here now? Think how financialy successful they would be if the knew what the stock market was going to do, which sports team was going to win, etc. Don't give me that baloney that it would be prohibited by some type of prime directive. Human nature would indicate that the temptation would be to great for some to resist.
Huh? How would the spinning part of the wormhole even stay "attached in time" to the front part? Seems to me you'd end up with a wormhole to nowhere.There's a theory that one couldn't travel back to before the time that the time machine was invented. The thinking goes that a "real" time machine would be a wormhole with one side that had been sent traveling really really fast. Time dialation would cause the two sides to be out of sync, and poof, time machine.
Dr. Popalot said:If time travel were possible then why aren't time travelers form the future here now?
Dancing David said:The biggest problem I see with time travel is the intrinsic motion of the earth, the sun and the galaxy. Sure you could go back in time(I doubt it) but then you would need an intergalactic spaceship to get back to the earth.
Peace
Trueblood said:There's a theory that one couldn't travel back to before the time that the time machine was invented.
DrChinese said:
Exactly, where would you go back to? We aren't sitting still.
If you went back in time, you would also need to travel to stay near Earth. And to do that, you would have to know where to go. And to do that, you would need to know what orbits we are in. After all, it is possible that we are moving through space at a few % of c (at least relative to some objects).
Further, we have no idea what accelerations are acting on us as we travel with Earth. We are in an elliptical orbit around many objects. Relative to some objects, we likely traverse some strange arc, possibly like a giant yo-yo.
So don't start up your time machine quite yet...
Andonyx said:
I think this is patently false....
You see we are traveling through time right now....just in the other direction....and I have no trouble keeping up with the Earth.
Dr. Popalot said:If time travel were possible then why aren't time travelers form the future here now?
Interesting Ian said:
I can think of so many reasons I wouldn't know where to start.
RedCoat said:
You are correct, we have no trouble keeping up with the earth. Our velocity vector is the same as the earth's, so our relative velocity is zero.
However, the earth's velocity (and ours with it) changes with time, since it is are rotating around the sun.
If you traveled instantly to a different point in time, to end up in the same location on the earth in which you started, you would need to instantly change both your velocity and position at the same instant. This instantaneous step-function change in velocity/position would be required to "make up" for the changes in velocity/position that happened in the time you "skipped".
-RedCoat
Dr. Popalot said:If time travel were possible then why aren't time travelers form the future here now? Think how financialy successful they would be if the knew what the stock market was going to do, which sports team was going to win, etc. Don't give me that baloney that it would be prohibited by some type of prime directive. Human nature would indicate that the temptation would be to great for some to resist.
jj said:Originally posted by Interesting Ian
I can think of so many reasons I wouldn't know where to start.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, yeah, so can I. I do wonder what you'd come up with. No, I'm not making this into a challenge, I know that my approach and yours are very different, and I wonder what reasoning you'd use.
Andonyx said:
Hey that's correct, unfortunately it is also exactly what I posted about the forth message of this topic. I'm not taking Issue with Dr. Chinese's claim, I'm on a one man crusade to stop people from posting before they read the entire topic.