• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Skeptics Society Debate "Physics vs. Christianity"

Frogberto

Scholar
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Messages
90
The weekend before last, I attended the Skeptics Society Debate between Frank Tipler and Laurence Krauss. It was the end of the 15th year of lectures (my 10th year of going), and this particular "debate" was billed as follows:

A Great Debate:
Can Physics Prove
God & Christianity?
Event Date: June 3, 2007 at 2:00 pm
Location: Baxter Lecture Hall

Speakers:
Dr. Frank Tipler, Professor of Mathematical Physics at Tulane University and the author of The Physics of Christianity, The Physics of Immortality, and The Anthropic Cosmological Principle

Dr. Lawrence Krauss is Professor of Physics and Astronomy and Director of the Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics at Case Western Reserve University, and the author of Hiding in the Mirror, Atom, Quintessence, and The Physics of Star Trek.

In his book, The Physics of Christianity, Dr. Tipler argues that the God depicted by Jews and Christians, the Uncaused First Cause, is completely consistent with the Cosmological Singularity, an entity whose existence is required by physical law. He makes the case for the scientific possibility of miracles, including the Virgin Birth (Jesus was a rare XX male), the Resurrection (a baryon-annihilation process converting flesh into neutrinos), and the Incarnation (reversing the dematerialization process). Tipler outlines practical experiments that can help prove the validity of the “miracles” at the heart of Christianity.

Dr. Krauss, an expert on cosmology, quantum mechanics, and general relativity, is quite familiar with Tipler’s arguments and will provide a cogent response and argue that the scientific evidence from these fields, upon which Tipler rests his case, do not confirm the central tenets of Christianity or any other religion, and that attempts to employ science in the service of religion are doomed to failure. Science and religion, Krauss believes, are best kept separate, and that the tools of science that search for naturalistic explanations cannot be used to prove the supernatural.

A few photographs from the debate:

536186062_b4e30329c2.jpg


Dr. Tipler:
536186312_348028a375.jpg


536303921_d4f43d68e4.jpg


Dr. Krauss:
536186770_90dbfd039f.jpg


536187286_334735b611.jpg


Tipler's strategy was to throw as many formulas, physics discussions, and boring black text on white background slides as the crowd could handle without dozing off, and then claiming that his points were proven, as shown by his last slide:

536304053_e55d483c72.jpg


I think a lot of people just said "huh"? The desired effect, I think, was to say "wow, this guy knows physics, so I'll trust that he must be right." That may work in a lot of other audiences, but not necessarily in this one.

Dr. Krauss clearly "won" this debate, and his talk was a pleasure to listen to, respectful, but clear, and with interesting examples from astronomy and physics to make his point(s) without confusion.

I did stay for the question and answer, and I do have to say, I expected this crowd to tear Tipler a new one - but they were respectful and inquisitive about his arguments.

Congratulations to the Skeptics Society on 15 years of lectures at Cal-Tech, in Pasadena. I always enjoy hanging out on this beautiful campus, so I took some additional photos. Enjoy:

536190398_49298a0333.jpg


536306403_fdfd024707.jpg


536189556_bf2caad3ee.jpg


536305101_90b7f921a4.jpg


536190226_49f4e69fc3.jpg


536190836_8a5664503c.jpg
 
I was looking forward to this one, and Tipler did not disappoint (nor did Krauss). Tipler blew clouds of smoke, waved his hands with abandon, and even invoked the name of Richard P. Feynman. But he did not manage to impress Caltech. :)

I've been waiting to hear him speak and defend his ideas (particularly the Omega Point theory of the grand Matrix-style resurrection waiting for the worthy at the far end of time). Call me a fan of the cracked pot. I did buy his book and get it signed by him. It'll be a fun summer read.

This was my 5th year of attending the lectures. See you in the fall, I hope.

--James
 
Has Tipler got a new book out? I read his Physics of Immortality years ago - interesting, but some clearly ropey arguments in the first half; needless to say, the 'physics' portion of the book, composed entirely of long, long formulae and equations, I can't comment on. I've never seen him speak, I bet it was very interesting.

Although his "a ... phenomena" slide makes me wince rather, one might expect better of a physicist!
 
What follows are my notes and commentary for this debate between physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler and physicist Prof. Lawrence M. Krauss.
Breach of rule 4 removed. Do not copy and paste material from elsewhere.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Or, how to use over-ingenious and overly technical reasoning to overlook the obvious: Legends get made, people make stuff up. Christianity is an accretion of stuff made up by humans.

No advanced physics needed. Just a little understanding of human nature.
 
Or, how to use over-ingenious and overly technical reasoning to overlook the obvious: Legends get made, people make stuff up. Christianity is an accretion of stuff made up by humans.

No advanced physics needed. Just a little understanding of human nature.

Hi, Calebprime.

Breach of rule 4 removed.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What follows are my notes and commentary for this debate between physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler and physicist Prof. Lawrence M. Krauss.

Breach of rule 4 removed. Do not copy and paste material from elsewhere.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles

It was not copy-and-pasted from elsewhere. It is my own writing. The only place it was "copy and paste[d]" from is from the text-editor on my own computer, from the very text-file whereupon I composed it.

Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>



Do not post material that is available in full elsewhere. This post was posted in April here, for example.

Also, do not repost material that has been modded. If you wish to dispute a moderator action, send a PM to a member of the mod-team, post in Forum Management or lodge an Appeal.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: zooterkin
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Back
Top Bottom