• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Should men be permitted to go bottomless?

1984

ex-PiousWoo
1
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Messages
343
Ladyhawk asked should women be able to go shirtless? Luciana Nery started a thread about taboo topics in the Movies forum. It was noted that not many films were willing to show full frontal male nudity and not be coy about it. So should men be permitted to go bottomless?
 
I wouldn't, even if it were allowed. Firstly, the undersides of most desks have unpleasant things on them I'm not about to get on my bits, and secondly, running bottomless is...unpleasant.
 
Life of Brian, anyone? I think there was something in Sideways, too.

Anyway, I think the lack of portrayals of the male unit have more to do with the fact that the dangly bits aren't really all that aesthetic and look a bit silly on film. Plus I don't think that too many actors really want to put themselves to the size test.
 
I think we should all be allowed to run around nude. I can see only two practical problems with that
1. Sunburn, skin cancer
2. You might get cold.
3. People might get to know the size of things that are normally covered up and compare with themselves.
 
rjh01 said:
I think we should all be allowed to run around nude. I can see only two practical problems with that
1. Sunburn, skin cancer
2. You might get cold.
3. People might get to know the size of things that are normally covered up and compare with themselves.
Click to expand...
People who like to nude in social settings are referred to as nudists or naturists (the preferred term depends on which group you are with ...)

1. Sunburn and skin cancer can be reduced or eliminated by staying in the shade or wearing sunscreen. After all, especially with males removing the swimsuit exposes only a little more skin.

2. Getting cold is certainly an issue.

3. Seeing what size the average breast or penis really is would likely reduce the amount of unncessary surgery performed in North America annually, and might also reduce the amount of spam I get in my inbox :)
 
Bottomless? Be some odd looking males about. Males without penises and ******** simply won't make it in this world.

Should females be permitted to go titless? Vaginaless?

What's that stuff about "if thine eye offend thee"?

M.
 
Moochie said:
The asterisks cloaked the vernacular for "behinds."

M.
Click to expand...

You mean "buttocks"?

Let's plumb the depths of this filter.

Buttocks.
Vibraphone.
Meat flute.
Naughty bits.
Cockerel.
Cock.
Dick.
Weenus.
Unit.
Titties.
Manflesh.
Member.
Butts.
Phallus.
Quim.
Twat.
Galumbits.
Frog.
 
1984 said:
Ladyhawk asked should women be able to go shirtless? Luciana Nery started a thread about taboo topics in the Movies forum. It was noted that not many films were willing to show full frontal male nudity and not be coy about it.
Click to expand...

It's a stupidity of the US, my own beloved country. I was in the Netherlands 15 years ago on contract for awhile; they had full frontal nudity of women and men on broadcast, government-owned television on Sunday afternoon. Maybe it doesn't destroy society after all. :jaw-dropp
 
Loon said:
"Quim?"
Click to expand...

Yes.

As in "Gonzo, the lead guitar player, placed his burning phallus in her quivering quim."

I think there's one person on this forum, maybe two, who know where that's from.
 
Why the hell not?

I mean, other than getting my various bits caught in things and the like. I'm a tall guy and the idea of doorknobs being MORE painful doesn't appeal, particularly.

And there is the 'gallant reflex' to consider....the damned thing has a mind of its own....


And we'd have to re-write the sexual harassment laws, of course. But that could just as easily be a benefit.

In social situations, though I don't see nudity as a problem, per se.
 
I think the crime of "flashing" is a real curiosity. How does it truly harm me if some clueless bozo feels the need to show his weiner? Should I gasp? Should I cry?

It's kind of a tough one to call, because I was cornered/threatened by a flasher once, when I was 19 and running a shop alone. And after that happened, I read that certain guys start doing the flashing thing and then escalate, sometimes all the way up to rape (I think this guy was working on escalating, as he physically attacked another gal the same morning).

And while some guy flashing people on a city street is one thing, a guy going to a school and flashing children is another thing. So I guess we're always going to have this kind of law.

Unless all you guys start going pantsless or something. And outlaw trenchcoats, I suppose.
 
ysabella:
Exactly. If going pantless wasn't a social taboo, no one would care. Including the kids at the elementary school. Sure, you'd get giggles and so and such at first, but after a few hours, the children would get bored and run off to do something else.

After a week, they'd care less.

The main 'trauma' caused in such cases is the reaction or overreaction of the parent. They've seen something BAD...they've done BAD...etc.

And if someone was getting turned on by watching little girls and boys, why we'd know a lot sooner, yes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom