corplinx
JREF Kid
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 8,952
Anyone else notice the careful reconstruction of Hillary Clinton that's been going on for her senate career?
Now, when she packed her carpet bag and ran from Arkansas to New York to buck the dues system and take the democrat senate candidacy, I knew she was planning to run for pres at some point.
Where did she get put in the senate? She's a career lawyer whose largest contribution to government was a failed nationalized health care plan. So where do they put her?
The Armed Services committee. Since being on the committee, she was often acted hawkish and even more hawkish than her other democrat counterparts.
Are they thatcherizing Hillary? Now, after moving her to a state to get her in the senate and putting her on one of the most important committees (which also gives her credentials for being commander in chief), are they trying to take Hillary and turn her into Margaret Thatcher?
Her other two committees? Environment and Health care. Its like they are fast-tracking Hillary for a presidential run by putting her on committees most likely to appeal to a broad range of voters.
For a female democrat to win the presidency, I believe they must be a bigtime hawk with a track record of being "tough" on defense. Now, I am sure her handlers know this too and if you notice she never says anything to put her on the anti-war side of the aisle.
Really, its amazing to me that we can watch a candidate be "manufactured" like this. All of this is my debatable speculation, but I hope its at least provocative.
Now, when she packed her carpet bag and ran from Arkansas to New York to buck the dues system and take the democrat senate candidacy, I knew she was planning to run for pres at some point.
Where did she get put in the senate? She's a career lawyer whose largest contribution to government was a failed nationalized health care plan. So where do they put her?
The Armed Services committee. Since being on the committee, she was often acted hawkish and even more hawkish than her other democrat counterparts.
Are they thatcherizing Hillary? Now, after moving her to a state to get her in the senate and putting her on one of the most important committees (which also gives her credentials for being commander in chief), are they trying to take Hillary and turn her into Margaret Thatcher?
Her other two committees? Environment and Health care. Its like they are fast-tracking Hillary for a presidential run by putting her on committees most likely to appeal to a broad range of voters.
For a female democrat to win the presidency, I believe they must be a bigtime hawk with a track record of being "tough" on defense. Now, I am sure her handlers know this too and if you notice she never says anything to put her on the anti-war side of the aisle.
Really, its amazing to me that we can watch a candidate be "manufactured" like this. All of this is my debatable speculation, but I hope its at least provocative.
