Sharon ordered it: Ethnic cleansing in Gaza

Mycroft

High Priest of Ed
Joined
Sep 10, 2003
Messages
20,501
PM: I gave order to plan evacuation of 17 Gaza settlements[/b]
The United States on Monday welcomed Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's statement to Haaretz that he has given orders to plan for the removal of 17 settlements in the Gaza Strip.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan said it was "encouraging that Israel is considering bold steps to reduce tensions between Israelis and Palestinians."

In an interview earlier Monday with Haaretz columnist Yoel Marcus, Sharon said, "I have given an order to plan for the evacuation of 17 settlements in the Gaza Strip." (The full interview with Sharon will appear Tuesday in Haaretz.)

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/389939.html

Fool recently accused Sharon of planning ethnic cleansing in the disputed territories. At the time I though that was pretty dumb, but it turns out he was right.
 
originally posted by Mycroft

Fool recently accused Sharon of planning ethnic cleansing in the disputed territories. At the time I though that was pretty dumb, but it turns out he was right.

As I am sure you are a man who seeks only the full and honest truth and decent treatment for everyone, Palestinians and Israelis alike, no doubt you will be only too happy to join all right thinking people and welcome Sharon's belated plan to put right a terrible wrong and get rid of illegal settlements.
 
I'm with E.J., Mycroft, what do you think about this?

Sharon is removing a few thousand settlers that require more soldiers to defend than there are settlers as I understand it.

Do you think pissing off the Palestinians is so important that even Israeli national security is secondary? It seems like most Israelis don't agree with you since the move was favored by a strong majority of Israelis.
 
E.J.Armstrong said:
As I am sure you are a man who seeks only the full and honest truth
and decent treatment for everyone, Palestinians and Israelis alike,
no doubt you will be only too happy to join all right thinking people
and welcome Sharon's belated plan to put right a terrible wrong
and get rid of illegal settlements.
Truth and politics seldom mix.
The righting of this wrong builds a wall that moves ever inward.
 
Mycroft said:


http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/389939.html

Fool recently accused Sharon of planning ethnic cleansing in the disputed territories. At the time I though that was pretty dumb, but it turns out he was right.

Once again with the "disputed territories" what is "disputed"?

Fool simply smiles when he reads of politicians who "gives orders to plan to do something"...why doesn't he just do it? Just stop expanding settlements, stop creating new ones. Hey, maybe if they can identify who they drove off the land at the point of a gun they could even "give orders to plan to give it back"... I realise that a politician suggesting he is planing to do something at some unspecified time in the future is good enough to convince a true believer....but not enough for this little black duck.

Deeds, not words..........lets see.
 
E.J.Armstrong said:


As I am sure you are a man who seeks only the full and honest truth and decent treatment for everyone, Palestinians and Israelis alike, no doubt you will be only too happy to join all right thinking people and welcome Sharon's belated plan to put right a terrible wrong and get rid of illegal settlements.

You think I should support ethnic cleansing?
 
Originally posted by davefoc
I'm with E.J., Mycroft, what do you think about this?

Sharon is removing a few thousand settlers that require more soldiers to defend than there are settlers as I understand it.

There are a lot of different ways to look at it.

One way would be to say that Israel is giving away something for nothing, and that’s likely to encourage more terrorism. That combined with Israel’s recent trade for some 400+ terrorist criminals to Hezbollah in exchange for three corpses and one POW is a bad sign for the future.

Another way to look at it is exactly as my thread title suggests: it’s ethnic cleansing. I’d like to know why it’s okay when Jews are the ethnicity being cleansed from a region, but not when it’s other groups.

A strategic point of view is that Israel’s withdrawal from the Gaza Strip would be to increase the size of the border that needs defending from 10 miles to 40 miles, but so far all we’re seeing is a removal of citizenry. Military withdrawal may or may not come later.

Originally posted by davefoc
Do you think pissing off the Palestinians is so important that even Israeli national security is secondary?

Pissing off the Palestinian-Arabs is not a goal that I support, though it sure seems to be a secondary effect of all of Israel’s defensive measures that I do support. The goal is defense, not antagonism.

Originally posted by davefoc
It seems like most Israelis don't agree with you since the move was favored by a strong majority of Israelis.

That depends on which poll you look at.
 
I am not sure exactly what Mycroft's point is and I feel a little bad about my previous post which probably wasn't fair if it even made sense.

But, I noticed something, about the way Sharon described the plan that did make it sound like ethic cleansing of a sort when he talked about no Jews living in Gaza after the settlements were removed.

The implication, was that no Jew would want to live with the Palestinians and/or the Palestinians wouldn't let any Jews live with them and/or that no Jew would take the chance of living with the Palestinians without the Iraeli army to back them up. I wasn't quite sure which. I think it was significant that Sharon didn't say Israeli but instead used the word Jew. I take from the use of the word Jew in that context that Sharon sees Israeli and Jew as the same thing.

I noticed that the Israelis are going to Washington to lobby for funds to help relocate the settlers. Does Mycroft think that the US should help with this? Why or why not?

edited to add: this was posted at same time as previous post by mycroft.
 
Originally posted by davefoc
I noticed that the Israelis are going to Washington to lobby for funds to help relocate the settlers. Does Mycroft think that the US should help with this? Why or why not?

United States foreign aid is a complex issue, and I don’t really have any strong opinions about it. In theory our foreign aid dollars buys us access, influence, and brings stability to regions that can increase trade so that our investment can, at least in part, be returned to us. I haven’t seen any hard data that says this investment is really worth while, but then I haven’t look for such data either.

Should the US help with this? I don’t know. It should probably be evaluated like any other request for aid. If it brings stability to the region and advances US interests, then probably yes. If it doesn’t do any of these things, then probably no.

Originally posted by davefoc edited to add: this was posted at same time as previous post by mycroft.

Would your post have changed if you had read mine first? :)
 
Synchronicity said:

Truth and politics seldom mix.
The righting of this wrong builds a wall that moves ever inward.
As it should be, right? Let it keep moving inward until it matches the legal boundaries.
 
Mycroft said:


You think I should support ethnic cleansing?

How is it ethnic cleansing for Israelis to remove their own people from an area?
 
I'm really not sure if I agree with Mycroft that this actually is ethnic cleansing, but I don't really think the ethnicity of those instituting ethnic cleansing really matters. Unless he lives in the settlements... in that case, when the proponents of ethnic cleansing are being washed out as well, it doesn't really seem to fit the phrase.
 
On the one hand, if they're being forced out of their homes at gunpoint, that'sa t the very least a criminal abuse of power and pretty much tantamount to ethnic cleansing, if not quite technically so.

On the other hand, you consider these as illegal settlements, it's nothing more than would happen to you or I were we to get together with a bunch of our friends and set up shop on someone else's land in, say, upstate New York, especially if we armed ourselves to the teeth and promised to resist any attempts to move us on with force.

Look at Tim's story of The Battle of Little Waltham . If those travellers had been armed and their encampment fortified, they would still have been moved on but I think they would've given Tim a little more than a hard hat and half-a-dozen of his mates to do it with.

I can see how the situation Mycroft is referring could be considered similar.

Graham
 
It seems NOT ONE of you is informed about the middle east problem in the slightest.

Lets retrace some FACTS instead of throwing the words "ethnic cleansing" around and then PRETENDING like you are intelligent and actually know what the words mean.




1) Since the Palestinian Authority OFFICIAL POSITION is all jews must be REMOVED from the West Bank and Gaza that is the definition of "ethnic cleansing".


2) While 20% of Israel's 6.6 million citizens are Arabs. Unlike their Palestinian counterparts in the West Bank and Gaza, Israelis Arabs have the right to vote, receive Israeli social services and can work inside Israel.


3) The West Bank was called JUDEA & SAMARIA for 3000 YEARS until it was RENAMED "The West Bank" in 1949 by Jordan.


4) Judea & Samaria was the ORIGINAL kingdom of the jews CENTURIES before the rise of Islam in 640 A.D. In 1003 B.C. King David established Jerusalem as Capital of United Kingdom of Israel. It remained the capital for for some 400 years.


5) The Gaza Strip is Egyptian, and has been Egyptian since BEFORE Christ was born. It was captured from Egypt in the 1967 war.


6)"Palestine" was the name given to the area by the ROMANS after the Philistines who were the enemy of, and defeated the United Kingdom of Israel.


7) When the Byzantine came, Jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the Caliphate conquered the land in 637 A.D. jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the Crusaders conquered the land in 1099, jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the Mamluks conquered the land in 1291, Jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the Turks conquered the land in 1516, Jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the British conquered the land in 1918, Jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.


8) In 1920, the League of Nations made Britain the mandatory power in Palestine, effective in 1922. In 1922 Britain allocated nearly 80% of Palestine to Transjordan. Thus, Jordan covers the majority of the land of Palestine under British Mandate.

Jordan comprises 76.9% of Palestine
Israel comprises 17.8% of Palestine
Judea & Samaria, (now known as the "West Bank"), and Gaza comprise 5.3% of Palestine


9) Yasser Arafat is the successor to Haj Muhammad Amin al Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem.

Husseini was a leader of the 1920 Arab riots where terror against Jews was INTRODUCED into Palestine.

Haj Muhammad Amin al Husseini led the Palestinians during the 1930s into their (abortive) rebellion against the British mandate government and during the 1940s into their (again abortive) attempt to prevent the emergence of the Jewish state in 1948 -- resulting in their catastrophic defeat and the creation of the Palestinian refugee problem.


10) According to documentation from the Nuremberg and Eichmann trials, the German SS helped finance Husseini's efforts in the 1936-39 uprising in Palestine.


11) Yasser Arafat and the PLO, (now the Palestinian Authority), are a TERRORIST organization with a long and well-documented terrorist history that was LEGITIMIZED by the U.N., France and Nobel Peace Prize Committee.


12) Yasser Arafat and the PLO tried to take over Jordan in 71-72 and failed, Yasser Arafat and the PLO tried to take over Lebanon in 75-90 and failed, and Yasser Arafat and the PLO have been ATTACKING Israel and MURDERING jews since thier very first (FAILED) operation on an Israeli water pumping station in 1964.


13) Since 1993 Arafat and the Palestinians have 'agreed' to;

Israel-PLO Recognition (Sept 93), Agreement on the Gaza Strip and the Jericho Area (May 94), Agreement on the Preparatory Transfer of Powers and Responsibilities (Aug 94), Interim Agreement between Israel and the Palestinians (Sept 95), The Wye River Memorandum (Oct 98), The Sharm el-Sheikh Memorandum (Sept 99), Protocol Concerning Safe Passage between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (Oct 99), Israeli-Palestinian Joint Statement-Taba (Jan 2001), The Tenet cease-fire (Jun 2001), Beirut Declaration on Saudi Peace Initiative (Mar 2002), The Performance-Based Roadmap to a Permanent Two-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (Apr 2003).

Under the terms of these MANY AGREEMENTS Arafat and his Palestinian Authority are OBLIGATED to arrest terrorists and dismantle their terrorist organizations, not provide them with safe haven.

Under the terms of these MANY AGREEMENTS Arafat and his Palestinian Authority are OBLIGATED to;

a) undertake an unconditional cessation of violence, b) undertake comprehensive political reform, c) undertake drafting a Palestinian constitution, d) undertake free, fair and open elections, e) undertake an unequivocal statement reiterating Israel’s right to exist in peace, f) undertake official Palestinian institutions to end their incitement against Israel, g) undertake visible efforts on the ground to arrest, disrupt, and restrain individuals and groups conducting and planning violent attacks on Israelis anywhere.

NONE OF THOSE OBLIGATIONS HAVE EVER BEEN MET.


__________________________________________________


That is why Sharon is removing the settlements. To stop the Palestinians attacking jews, and to "disengage" from Arafat and the PLO once and for all.

Settlers have every right to live in the West Bank AND Gaza, why does 19 years of Jordanian occupation in Judea & Samaria, (1948-1967), negate 3,300 years of Jewish history?

But the Palestinians WANT TO "ethnically cleanse" all jews from the West Bank and Gaza.

As Dennis Miller said;

For the sake of honesty, let's not use the word "Palestinian" any more to describe these delightful folks, who dance for joy at our deaths until someone points out they're being taped. Instead, let's call them what they REALLY are:

"Other Arabs Who Can't Accomplish Anything In Life And Would Rather Wrap Themselves In The Seductive Melodrama Of Eternal Struggle And Death."


And I highly recommend all of you should look up words, (like "ethnic cleansing"), BEFORE you go public on a message board and use it.

Regards

Zenith-Nadir
 
zenith-nadir said:
It seems NOT ONE of you is informed about the middle east problem in the slightest.

Lets retrace some FACTS instead of throwing the words "ethnic cleansing" around and then PRETENDING like you are intelligent and actually know what the words mean.

Gladly. Shame you didn't provide any, though. This looks like another regurgitated chain letter someone sent you.


1) Since the Palestinian Authority OFFICIAL POSITION is all jews must be REMOVED from the West Bank and Gaza that is the definition of "ethnic cleansing".

No, that's not the PA's position, "official" or otherwise. They call for the removal of the illegal settlements, true; but they do not call for "all jews" to be removed. There are Jews who live in the WB and Gaza who don't live in the Jewish-only settlements.


2) While 20% of Israel's 6.6 million citizens are Arabs. Unlike their Palestinian counterparts in the West Bank and Gaza, Israelis Arabs have the right to vote, receive Israeli social services and can work inside Israel.

Yep, regurgitated spam. First of all, not even the Israelis deny that Israeli Arabs are subject to widespread discrimination, and the amount that they can work, vote, receive social services is always being modified.

Second, considering that Israel lords over a number of Palestinians (in Israel as well as the WB and Gaza) who they don't give the right to vote, and in fact carefully control how many non-Jews they allow to be citizens, the "democratic" nature of this is suspect.


3) The West Bank was called JUDEA & SAMARIA for 3000 YEARS until it was RENAMED "The West Bank" in 1949 by Jordan.

Half-truth. It was referred to as Judea and Samaria by the West, sure, who called it by its Biblical name. That's not how the residents of the area, predominantly Arab, referred to it.

Second, the oh-so-criminal "renaming" to the West Bank is because it's on the WEST BANK OF THE JORDAN RIVER!


4) Judea & Samaria was the ORIGINAL kingdom of the jews CENTURIES before the rise of Islam in 640 A.D. In 1003 B.C. King David established Jerusalem as Capital of United Kingdom of Israel. It remained the capital for for some 400 years.

Definitely regurgitated spam, or you wouldn't be spewing this drivel on a board full of skeptics.

1. There is some doubt whether "King David" actually existed; there is widespread consensus among archaeologists that if he did exist, he was probably just a hilltop chieftain, not a king of all the land of Israel. In all likelihood, David is simply a myth.
2. There was never any kingdom that ruled all of the WB, or all of Israel, before the Romans.
3. If you really think I have the right to kick someone off their land because my ancestors lived there, please supply your city so I may contact the appropriate Native American nation.


6)"Palestine" was the name given to the area by the ROMANS after the Philistines who were the enemy of, and defeated the United Kingdom of Israel.

(See previous comments about the non-existence of the "United Kingdom of Israel.")

"Palestine" as a name stuck for 2000 years. I have a coin from the 1940s with "Palestine" written on it in English, Hebrew/Yiddish, and Arabic. It was universally referred to as "Palestine," even by the Zionists.


7) When the Byzantine came, Jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the Caliphate conquered the land in 637 A.D. jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the Crusaders conquered the land in 1099, jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the Mamluks conquered the land in 1291, Jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the Turks conquered the land in 1516, Jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.
When the British conquered the land in 1918, Jews lived in Judea-Samaria and Gaza.

Of course, the populations weren't so dense; the number of Jews in all of Palestine during the turn of the century numbered in the tens of thousands (compared to close to 2 million Arabs).


8) In 1920, the League of Nations made Britain the mandatory power in Palestine, effective in 1922. In 1922 Britain allocated nearly 80% of Palestine to Transjordan. Thus, Jordan covers the majority of the land of Palestine under British Mandate.

Jordan comprises 76.9% of Palestine
Israel comprises 17.8% of Palestine
Judea & Samaria, (now known as the "West Bank"), and Gaza comprise 5.3% of Palestine

Completely irrelevant to the current situation.


9) Yasser Arafat is the successor to Haj Muhammad Amin al Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem.

Completely untrue in any way, shape, or form. A mufti is a religious leader. Arafat is a political leader. Not a particularly effective one, IMO, but he's not an imam or mufti.


Husseini was a leader of the 1920 Arab riots where terror against Jews was INTRODUCED into Palestine.

Haj Muhammad Amin al Husseini led the Palestinians during the 1930s into their (abortive) rebellion against the British mandate government and during the 1940s into their (again abortive) attempt to prevent the emergence of the Jewish state in 1948 -- resulting in their catastrophic defeat and the creation of the Palestinian refugee problem.

Yes, there were riots against the Jews. As the Zionist immigration project, begun in the late 1800s, began to pick up steam, there were rebellions against the foreign immigrants. It's not something the Palestinians should be particularly proud of, but when you consider that the stated goal of these immigrants was to create a state by and for THEM, you start to understand where the Palestinians are coming from.

If a bunch of Mormons moved into your neighborhood with the intended goal of creating a Mormon state there, including your home, you probably wouldn't be too pleased.


10) According to documentation from the Nuremberg and Eichmann trials, the German SS helped finance Husseini's efforts in the 1936-39 uprising in Palestine.

Not true at all. There was some contact, yes, but it was never very extensive and there was never any transfer of funds.

In fact, the only Jewish groups the Nazis would deal with were Zionists, because their immediate goal was the same; a Jew-free Germany.


11) Yasser Arafat and the PLO, (now the Palestinian Authority), are a TERRORIST organization with a long and well-documented terrorist history that was LEGITIMIZED by the U.N., France and Nobel Peace Prize Committee.

First: PLO != PA. The PLO's a coalition of a number of different Palestinian organizations, the PA is a toothless governing body.

Second: Many "legitimate" movements have been characterized as "terrorist." The African National Congress comes to mind.


12) Yasser Arafat and the PLO tried to take over Jordan in 71-72 and failed, Yasser Arafat and the PLO tried to take over Lebanon in 75-90 and failed, and Yasser Arafat and the PLO have been ATTACKING Israel and MURDERING jews since thier very first (FAILED) operation on an Israeli water pumping station in 1964.

This is why you should never take spam at face value; it gives you this tripe, then you believe it because you want to.

The PLO never tried to take over Lebanon or Jordan. There were some riots in the Palestinian refugee camps in those countries due to the shoddy treatment by their respective governments. There was never any coup attempt.


That is why Sharon is removing the settlements. To stop the Palestinians attacking jews, and to "disengage" from Arafat and the PLO once and for all.

Settlers have every right to live in the West Bank AND Gaza, why does 19 years of Jordanian occupation in Judea & Samaria, (1948-1967), negate 3,300 years of Jewish history?

No, settlers don't have that right. International law expressly forbids it, after Germany set up "settlements" in occupied Poland.

You don't have the right to come in and steal someone else's land, then forbid them from living in your community (the settlements are Jewish-only; Palestinians are not permitted to even use the roads that run between them). You--or more accurately, the spam you're posting--refer to 19 years of Jordan's occupation as if there were only Jews living in the WB and Gaza for the 3300 years before that. That, my friend, is a complete and total misrepresentation of the truth.

As I said, yes, there were always Jews in Palestine, but their numbers were very low (in the tens of thousands), and they lived among their Arab neighbors IN PEACE. There was never any attempt to set up "settlements" where Arabs were forbidden to travel on pain of death.


But the Palestinians WANT TO "ethnically cleanse" all jews from the West Bank and Gaza.

Yes, yes, those evil Palestinians should be wiped out, because they wage an endless war against the Ar--excuse me, the Jews, and they represent a clear danger to the Fatherl--Israel.


As Dennis Miller said;

For the sake of honesty, let's not use the word "Palestinian" any more to describe these delightful folks, who dance for joy at our deaths until someone points out they're being taped. Instead, let's call them what they REALLY are:

"Other Arabs Who Can't Accomplish Anything In Life And Would Rather Wrap Themselves In The Seductive Melodrama Of Eternal Struggle And Death."

Well, that clinches it.

Listen to me very carefully: YOUR INBOX IS NOT A HISTORY LESSON.

Dennis Miller never said any such thing; that email's been making the rounds a long time, it is not something Dennis Miller ever wrote or said.

From those pro-Palestinian anti-Semites at Snopes:

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/miller.htm
 
Oh....I see we are going to have fun today.



Cleon said:
Gladly. Shame you didn't provide any, though. This looks like another regurgitated chain letter someone sent you.

Well whatever REALITY you need to CREATE to justify your flawed fictional assumption is no concern of mine Cleon.



Cleon said:
No, that's not the PA's position, "official" or otherwise. They call for the removal of the illegal settlements, true; but they do not call for "all jews" to be removed. There are Jews who live in the WB and Gaza who don't live in the Jewish-only settlements.

I suggest if you are an honest guy Cleon, which you are not, you read up a bit on the Palestinian Authority calls for the "destruction of Israel".

Note: that each Khatib (preacher) is a paid employee of the Palestinian Authority (PA).

Here are the transcripts of PA sermons to the Palestinian people from 2000-2003

http://www.memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=countries&Area=palestinian&ID=SR2403






Then your "argument" Cleon continues with "zenith-nadir's post is regurgitated spam","Israel continually modifies the amount Israeli Arabs can vote", "israel is non-democratic to non-jews" and a whole bunch of other PROPOGANDA that is laughable.





Cleon said:
Half-truth. It was referred to as Judea and Samaria by the West, sure, who called it by its Biblical name. That's not how the residents of the area, predominantly Arab, referred to it.

Judea and Samaria PREDATES the rise of Islam by CENTURIES. But only the "West" called it that? The "west" didn't even EXSIST yet Einstein and the place already had it's name, a history and inhabitants.



Then Cleon rambles on about "King David not exsisting", "The Northern Kingdom known as Israel and a Southern Kingdom known as Judah not exsisting".....none of which is based in fact.....Hahahahaha, endless comedy.



Cleon said:
"Palestine" as a name stuck for 2000 years. I have a coin from the 1940s with "Palestine" written on it in English, Hebrew/Yiddish, and Arabic. It was universally referred to as "Palestine," even by the Zionists..

Hebrew and Yiddish are two entirely SEPARATE languages, there is NO YIDDISH on any coins minted by the The Palestine Currency Board of the British Mandate. That little error EXPOSES your lack of true knowledge about jews or Israel.

The Romans named Palestine, not the Arabs.



Cleon said:
Completely untrue in any way, shape, or form. A mufti is a religious leader. Arafat is a political leader. Not a particularly effective one, IMO, but he's not an imam or mufti...


Arafat's REAL name is Rahman Abdul Rauf el-Qudwa al-Husseini.....The grand mufti of Jerusalem was Haj Muhammad Amin al-Husseini.



Anyhow I tire of punching holes through your garbage Cleon.

Your ENTIRE post Cleon is made up of unproven assumptions, inaccuracies, easily disproven claims and attempts at changing well-documented history.
 
Cleon said:
The PLO never tried to take over Lebanon or Jordan. There were some riots in the Palestinian refugee camps in those countries due to the shoddy treatment by their respective governments. There was never any coup attempt.



PERFECT EXAMPLE OF CLEON REWRITING HISTORY TO SUPPORT HIS PROPOGANDA.



Jordanian-PLO Civil War


Lebanese - PLO civil war


I rest my case about Cleon's complete lack of integrity.
 
No, that's not the PA's position, "official" or otherwise. They call for the removal of the illegal settlements, true; but they do not call for "all jews" to be removed. There are Jews who live in the WB and Gaza who don't live in the Jewish-only settlements.
I suggest if you are an honest guy Cleon, which you are not, you read up a bit on the Palestinian Authority calls for the "destruction of Israel"
You're both partially right... The PA's doesn't officially hold the "destruction of isreal," these days. They removed that from their charter in the 90s. There is sometimes murmer about the destruction of Isreal, but it's hardly official.

And Zenith, that link is blatently biased against Arabs. Did you see the "cartoons" section? They have three types of cartoons. "Common Antisemitic Cartoons," "Jews and Israelis Controlling the U.S. Government," and "Jews and Israelis as Nazis and Hitler."
 
I'm always glad to see someone back up their statements with references to mythology. :D

The land that is currently Israel was under Muslim control for centuries; the Jews have no claim to it. The creation of Israel is something close to the equivalent of the UN deciding to give Texas back to Mexico next week.
 
Zero said:


The land that is currently Israel was under Muslim control for centuries; the Jews have no claim to it. The creation of Israel is something close to the equivalent of the UN deciding to give Texas back to Mexico next week.

Not really. Texas was never in Mexican control for centuries.
 

Back
Top Bottom