Sharia law imposed on Dearborn, MI?

This is the first I've heard of this and I'm willing to keep an open mind, but there are red flags here. First is the first comment after the article:
This is a total lie, I was among many Christian groups that were at the festival, evangelizing Muslims. None of us had problems. We all saw David Wood and his video group trying to cause a scene.

They are trying to showboat, please stop believing them.
Click to expand...
The second red flag are the numerous references hinting these guys were on an Evangelical mission among people who likely weren't interested in the message.
 
yup.


#1. look at this guy's t-shirt and his necklace. very very christian.

#2. we never get to find out what the "question" was to the Muslim radicals.

#3. why did they approach people with whom they knew they would have a problem?

these guys were looking for ****..and they got ****.

Im not excusing nor justifying the actions of the "security" personnel, but still..these guys got EXACTLY what they wanted.

self-made martyrs to Christ.
 
While sidewalks are normally a public forum, they're not when they have been reserved for a private event. That's what the Arab festival did.

Nabeel was told, this year and last year, that he can reserve a location at the festival and represent his organization there. Other Arab Christian groups do so. The festival organizers consider this to be "equality" with the Muslim groups, but Nabeel does not. He wants to walk around the festival and get in people's faces.
 
Last edited:
Assuming the story is more or less as-is, it's the job of the police to protect those people and ensure their safety, not to arrest them.

See, it's a free country, and you get to go into public places, even when people don't want you there -- even when they threaten to kill you.
 
Beerina said:
Assuming the story is more or less as-is, it's the job of the police to protect those people and ensure their safety, not to arrest them.

See, it's a free country, and you get to go into public places, even when people don't want you there -- even when they threaten to kill you.
Click to expand...

But the area was booked for a private event. So it stopped being a public place during the event. If a bi-racial couple book a park for a wedding it is not the job of the police to protect any anti-miscegenation protesters who show up to start trouble.
 
Beerina said:
Assuming the story is more or less as-is, it's the job of the police to protect those people and ensure their safety, not to arrest them.....
Click to expand...
That depends on the location. If you are talking about private property, including temporary private property, then why should the invader have rights to ignore the rights of the people who are lawfully in control of the space?
 
papango said:
But the area was booked for a private event. So it stopped being a public place during the event. If a bi-racial couple book a park for a wedding it is not the job of the police to protect any anti-miscegenation protesters who show up to start trouble.
Click to expand...

Anti-miscegenation? Who uses terminology like that?

"Racist" is so much simpler, and conveys the idea much more clearly.
 
So in Dearborn, they've started hacking off limbs for stealing, lashing young women who were unescorted by a male family member, stoning alleged adulterers to death...?

:confused:
 
ravdin said:
So in Dearborn, they've started hacking off limbs for stealing, lashing young women who were unescorted by a male family member, stoning alleged adulterers to death...?

:confused:
Click to expand...
According to the OP link, not the OP author:

Well this year, these good, decent Americans were arrested -- based on what? Based on sharia (Islamic) law.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
I have no use for Christianity or Islam. They are both woo-woo superstitions and humanity would be far better off without them.

However. If you are a security guard at a large event, and a small group of people start taking actions which are angering the the majority group at that event, your responsibility is to prevent an escalation to the point at which people get hurt. The simplest, quickest and easiest way to achieve that is to remove the small group of people.

They did indeed go looking for trouble. The security team, while taking some actions that were reprehensible, successfully prevented them from getting the level of trouble they actually wanted.
 
The Central Scrutinizer said:
This cannot be over emphasized.
Click to expand...

Wanna Bet?

text1.gif
text2.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom