Grammatron
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 5,444
From the article:
I don't know how to judge this one; on one hand it's a person's right to do whatever with their bodies on the other the person in question is a 13 year old child and although it doesn't become irreversible till 16 it still doesn't seem right.
An Australian court has issued a landmark ruling to allow a 13-year-old child to begin sex-change procedures.
"Alex", is biologically a girl, but wishes to be considered and referred to as a male.
Brought up as a boy by his father, he opts to wear nappies to school rather than use female toilets.
It is the first time an Australian child has been given legal approval to begin hormone treatment based solely on a psychiatric assessment.
The decision has been both applauded and condemned by commentators.
....
In approving the application, the court stipulated that Alex's treatment be phased so that it does not become irreversible until he reaches 16.
I don't know how to judge this one; on one hand it's a person's right to do whatever with their bodies on the other the person in question is a 13 year old child and although it doesn't become irreversible till 16 it still doesn't seem right.