• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Septemper Clues - Must See Video on 9/11 TV Fakery

So when my girlfriend's cousin saw the plane with his own eyes....what was he really seeing?
 
You know, OP's that post links to something, say it's "interesting", but don't actually make any effort to discuss that to which they were linking is really no different than the old flaming-bag-off-poop-on-the-doorstep prank. Quite droll really.
 
I haven't watched the video, has somone duplicated the "TV fakery" using 2001 technology?

You know, actually trying to produce a fake image that looks exactly like what was broadcast on 9/11?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
http://www.livevideo.com/video/6F393F4DE41C4CF798CBB438E6378129/september-clues-part1.aspx

New. Must See. Highly recommended. In 4 parts. Watch and listen to them all.

Have fun attempting to debunk this agents.
Click to expand...

Ooh, ooh, let me have a go at debunking. I'm a new agent, so I may not get it quite right. . .

(clears throat)
Everything you ever post is entirely wrong. You have wasted most of your life. You are wasted most of your life. Anything you agree with is automatically debunked merely due to the fact that you agree with it.

Hey, that was easy, I didn't even need to watch that video thing you posted!
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
You know, OP's that post links to something, say it's "interesting", but don't actually make any effort to discuss that to which they were linking is really no different than the old flaming-bag-off-poop-on-the-doorstep prank. Quite droll really.
Click to expand...

I think a member should be warned if after starting a thread a certain number of replies are posted with no response from the OP.
 
This is ridiculous.

A women who doesnt see what caused the first explosion sees the 2nd plane strike. This causes her to say "oh my god another plane has hit the 2nd tower."
OH MY GOD I THOUGHT SHE DIDNT SEE THE FIRST PLANE NOW SAYS 'ANOTHER PLANE' WHEN SHE DIDNT SEE THE FIRST PLANE!!!!1

Uhhh no. If you just saw a jet airliner slam into the South Tower what do you assume hit the North Tower and caused that massive explosion? Hmmmm flying giraffes maybe????

Absolute rubbish.
 
... Are you joking? In first one with CNN

A. They were switching to close up footage just as the other plane came into view and the Blackout was most likely caused by someone in the booth scrambling to switch it back.

B. The reporter at the desk was most likely getting reams of update notes and not even looking at the studio monitor until he heard the others in the studio react.

C. What microphone? He had to have been on a cell because if he had a camera and a mike you can bet that they would have switched to his view to show the people "running and screaming.

On the CBS clip, unlike the desk reporter mentioned above she wasn't getting notes. So guess what... SHE WAS WATCHING TV! They're amazed she saw it from Chelsea? Hell man my Dad was 63 and wearing bifocals and he saw it from NORTH CAROLINA!

That's just about 2 minutes in. Is there really any reason to watch the rest?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Have fun attempting to debunk this agents.
Click to expand...

Agents? I thought I joined a forum that discusses skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science. But apparently I accidentally joined a Men in Black forum. Hiding in plain sight... brilliant.
 
Is there a "Viewers Who Can Read Faster Than 50 WPM Edition" I could watch?

This (along with every other truther video ever made) is a conspiracy to waste my time by making me stare at full-screen captions and titles for 15 times longer than it takes to actually read them.

"Let's look at that video again" says the title. Okay, let's. I'm waiting. Where's the video? Let me read that sentence again. It still says "Let's look at that video again." Okay, I did read it right the first time. Always good to make sure. So where's the video? Did they lose it? Hmm, I wonder what font that is. Helvetica, maybe. Looks pretty good, but the vertical centering is a little off and the apostrophe in "Let's" runs into the t. Needs some kerning there. At least the apostrophe's in the right place this time. Is that video ready yet? It'll be lunchtime soon. I wonder if I have any of those mini pizzas left in the freezer. Maybe I should have yogurt instead, haven't been getting much exercise lately. The title screen's still there. Did my computer freeze? Or am I supposed to click to continue? The little clock numbers are still counting, so I suppose not. It says "again," so it's going to be the same video, so they can't have lost it, could they?

Oh, wait, it's fading in. Finally...

Nope, it wasn't worth waiting for.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Nucking Futs says it all. This is the first and last post I will grant mr.baker with,as this is all the video, his theories, etc...deserve.

And, as I know you will ask, the answer is NO I DID NOT WATCH THE VIDEOS.

Just like I would not watch a mental patients video "Proof" that he was Jesus, I will not watch your "Proof" of No-Plane 9/11 Video Fakery.


TAM:)
 
Brainache said:
I haven't watched the video, has somone duplicated the "TV fakery" using 2001 technology?

You know, actually trying to produce a fake image that looks exactly like what was broadcast on 9/11?
Click to expand...

My stupidity threshold was reached within the first three minutes. Here's a brief synopsis:

Live video feed cuts away from long shot of WTC1 burning to a close-up shot of the hole right as UA 175 comes into the frame. Cuts back instantly, showing huge fireball but not the actual impact itself. News anchors piddle their pants: "omg wtf m8! There has been an explosion inside the other building"

Implied conclusion: INZIDE JAWB LOLZ.
 
one of the central points of the argument is that the "convenient" fade to black happens at the same time on two networks. A list of WTC Tenents //home.att.net/~sl.schofield4/wtc/documents/wtc1_tenents_a_k.html reveals that both CNN and WNYW where the footage is from were both housed in the towers on floor 110. Guess what was there? Broadcast antennae. In fact when I personally was watching the live feed, in Queens, over the air broadcast, not cable, the signal went dead at the moment of impact. In fact TV over the air in NYC was affected for a few days until broadcasting could resume from the Empire State building.
 
Riser Glen said:
Agents? I thought I joined a forum that discusses skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science. But apparently I accidentally joined a Men in Black forum. Hiding in plain sight... brilliant.
Click to expand...

Umm guys, another one got past the screening process. Perhaps we need a refresher on Policy Zulu Niner, specifically subsections a) and e), involving the assimilation and integration of new recruits.

Not to worry, Riser Glen. We'll issue your NWO Aviator Sunglasses and access card to the Bohemian Grove rec facility by the end of the week.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
You know, OP's that post links to something, say it's "interesting", but don't actually make any effort to discuss that to which they were linking is really no different than the old flaming-bag-off-poop-on-the-doorstep prank. Quite droll really.
Click to expand...
A way to guarantee that i will not look at the link. Some OPs then may claim that I'm ignoring them, but I'm not - I'm firing kittens at 'em.


Kitten Launcher no.3 crew load Death Ray Eye Kittens.
Kitten Launcher no.3 crew - Fire!
 

Attachments

  • deathrays.jpg
    deathrays.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 399
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom