Senate Panel & Able Danger

[firecoins]

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-intel25dec25,0,3149507.story?coll=la-home-headlines

The Senate Intelligence Committee has rejected as untrue one of the most disturbing claims about the Sept. 11 terrorist strikes — a congressman's contention that a team of military analysts identified Mohamed Atta or other hijackers before the attacks — according to a summary of the panel's investigation obtained by The Times.

The conclusion contradicts assertions by Rep. Curt Weldon (R-Pa.) and a few military officers that U.S. national security officials ignored startling intelligence available in early 2001 that might have helped to prevent the attacks.

I am not sure how the Senate Panel came to the conclusion it did. I do/did believe Able Danger did identify some 9/11 hijackers. I do not believe that is a conspiracy theory if I am right. It does not mean LIHOP if Able Danger did ID some of the hijackers. National security leaders ignored much evidence of impending attacks because it was not apart of their political agenda or they felt it would hurt their career to pursue something they did not want to believe was possible.

From the same article later on

Though the committee concluded that claims about Able Danger were unfounded, two of the hijackers were known to the U.S. intelligence community before the Sept. 11 attacks. The two had been observed by the CIA attending a meeting with Al Qaeda operatives in Malaysia, but that information was not shared with other agencies in time to locate them after they had entered the United States and moved to San Diego.Though the committee concluded that claims about Able Danger were unfounded, two of the hijackers were known to the U.S. intelligence community before the Sept. 11 attacks. The two had been observed by the CIA attending a meeting with Al Qaeda operatives in Malaysia, but that information was not shared with other agencies in time to locate them after they had entered the United States and moved to San Diego.

 

[A W Smith]

Is that Nick Dangers brother?

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Is that Nick Dangers brother?

Must be related to Regand Kcin.

 

[Brainster]

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-intel25dec25,0,3149507.story?coll=la-home-headlines


I am not sure how the Senate Panel came to the conclusion it did. I do/did believe Able Danger did identify some 9/11 hijackers. I do not believe that is a conspiracy theory if I am right. It does not mean LIHOP if Able Danger did ID some of the hijackers. National security leaders ignored much evidence of impending attacks because it was not apart of their political agenda or they felt it would hurt their career to pursue something they did not want to believe was possible.

From the same article later on

I read the report and to me it seemed obvious that one or two people interested in reviving the program made bogus claims of having seen the name on a chart, and the rest remembered being told that after the fact but did not see the chart in question. Yet oddly, they did not come forward immediately after 9-11 but years later.

Suppose you were looking at a chart in 2000 and seeing 40 or so names and faces on a chart. Would you remember one particular name and face a year or so later when it became famous? Or is it more likely that you would have a false memory months and years after 9-11 that the face and name seemed familiar?

There are a couple of ridiculous claims in the report as well. One guy said he had a copy of the chart up on his wall for 3 years and showed it to maybe 30-40 people over the years, specifically pointing out Mohammed Atta as having been identified before the fact. And yet he could not produce the chart (he claimed it had "disintegrated" when he took it off the wall to move to a new office) or any of the people who had seen it.

 

[uk_dave]

And yet he could not produce the chart (he claimed it had "disintegrated" when he took it off the wall to move to a new office) or any of the people who had seen it.

ahhhhhh either one of our special NWO Self Destructing Wallcharts (similar to the 2000 Britney Spears Calender)..... or he was cooking meth amphetamine without the requisite ventilation.

 

[boloboffin]

Well, of course, the fix is in. The truthers at DU are already complaining about government investigating government. One of them put up a list of the Senate committee members, and one of those members is Russell Feingold. You might think Feingold would get a good reception at the DU September 11th forum, but when I said his word was good enough for me, somebody dredged up a quote of his where he called John Ashcroft "his friend". So, obviously one of the few members of Congress to vote against the Iraq War is a part of the government conspiracy/cover up. Hoo boy.

 

[gumboot]

So, obviously one of the few members of Congress to vote against the Iraq War is a part of the government conspiracy/cover up. Hoo boy.

The entire Iraq war is a clever and elaborate plan by the NWO to fool the populace into thinking the Republicans and democrats are two separate entities, and further, with the clear goals of 1) Making the world hate the USA and 2) dividing the nation.

It's all just part of our...er... I mean THEIR clever scheme.

-Gumboot