• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Searching For Bobby Fischer - in cell block D

The Central Scrutinizer said:
No, it means that he is a self described "constitutional expert". No body else has given him that moniker.

This is a lie and you know it. He calls himself a "student" of the Constitution. Other people did, indeed, describe him as a Constitutional expert.

By the way, he has, at least, READ the Constitution—that makes him much more of an expert on it than practically anyone in office!

And given your continued display of how little you know about the document, he obviously knows a LOT more about it than you do! That's why you disparage him and call him and those who support him names instead of actually rebutting what he has to say.
 
shanek said:
This is a lie and you know it. He calls himself a "student" of the Constitution. Other people did, indeed, describe him as a Constitutional expert.

By the way, he has, at least, READ the Constitution—that makes him much more of an expert on it than practically anyone in office!

And given your continued display of how little you know about the document, he obviously knows a LOT more about it than you do! That's why you disparage him and call him and those who support him names instead of actually rebutting what he has to say.

Other loonies (and marks) have described him as an "expert". That does not make him so.

I know what the 2nd ammendment means. He does not (personal nukes, LOL). That means I know more.
 
The Central Scrutinizer said:
I know what the 2nd ammendment means. He does not (personal nukes, LOL). That means I know more.

I asked Badnarik directly about that. He said that the mere ownership of nukes constitute a "clear and present danger" and are thus different from firearms. You do NOT know what you are talking about, and the statements you attribute to him are WRONG. And what's worse, you obviously don't care that they are.
 
shanek said:
I asked Badnarik directly about that. He said that the mere ownership of nukes constitute a "clear and present danger" and are thus different from firearms. You do NOT know what you are talking about, and the statements you attribute to him are WRONG. And what's worse, you obviously don't care that they are.

It's interesting that others (RCC, Varwoche) found those statements on his website and in various interviews on the web. So you are saying they are making them up?
 
The Central Scrutinizer said:
It's interesting that others (RCC, Varwoche) found those statements on his website and in various interviews on the web. So you are saying they are making them up?


I'm not arguing with someone who represents herself with an orange swordfish and won't even explain it.

Yes I said HERself. Homo.
 
American said:
I'm not arguing with someone who represents herself with an orange swordfish and won't even explain it.

Yes I said HERself. Homo.

I thought you would get turned on since we are discussing a man.
 

Back
Top Bottom