• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Scientists supersize quantum mechanics - Largest ever object put into quantum state.

Towlie

ancillary character
Joined
May 22, 2009
Messages
1,474
This sounds pretty far-fetched to me. I'm not even sure what it means.

http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100317/full/news.2010.130.html

A team of scientists has succeeded in putting an object large enough to be visible to the naked eye into a mixed quantum state of moving and not moving.

Andrew Cleland at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and his team cooled a tiny metal paddle until it reached its quantum mechanical 'ground state' — the lowest-energy state permitted by quantum mechanics. They then used the weird rules of quantum mechanics to simultaneously set the paddle moving while leaving it standing still. The experiment shows that the principles of quantum mechanics can apply to everyday objects as well as as atomic-scale particles.

(Skipping ahead)

Wonderful weirdness

Cleland and his team took a more direct measure of quantum weirdness at the large scale. They began with a a (sic) tiny mechanical paddle, or 'quantum drum', around 30 micrometres long that vibrates when set in motion at a particular range of frequencies. Next they connected the paddle to a superconducting electrical circuit that obeyed the laws of quantum mechanics. They then cooled the system down to temperatures below one-tenth of a kelvin.

At this temperature, the paddle slipped into its quantum mechanical ground state. Using the quantum circuit, Cleland and his team verified that the paddle had no vibrational energy whatsoever. They then used the circuit to give the paddle a push and saw it wiggle at a very specific energy.

Next, the researchers put the quantum circuit into a superposition of 'push' and 'don't push', and connected it to the paddle. Through a series of careful measurements, they were able to show that the paddle was both vibrating and not vibrating simultaneously...

Edited by LashL: 
To remove copyrighted image. Please see Rule 4 (and Rule 5).

Read the whole article.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm no physicist, but am I correct in stating that this following excerpt isn't really saying anything at all?

Next they connected the paddle to a superconducting electrical circuit that obeyed the laws of quantum mechanics. They then cooled the system down to temperatures below one-tenth of a kelvin.

At this temperature, the paddle slipped into its quantum mechanical ground state. Using the quantum circuit, Cleland and his team verified that the paddle had no vibrational energy whatsoever. They then used the circuit to give the paddle a push and saw it wiggle at a very specific energy.

Next, the researchers put the quantum circuit into a superposition of 'push' and 'don't push', and connected it to the paddle. Through a series of careful measurements, they were able to show that the paddle was both vibrating and not vibrating simultaneously.

"a superconducting electrical circuit that obeyed the laws of quantum mechanics"?

"they then used the circuit to give the paddle a push and saw it wiggle"?

and then they 'simply' "put the quantum circuit into a superposition"?

Are they just using the "quantum" catch-word liberally or something in stupid ways? They're not explaining how anything was done whatsoever that I can tell. If they truly were able to put a large object into a state of superposition, wouldn't they at least try to explain it better? Perhaps it's just a crappilly written article or something ... am I missing something?
 
Last edited:
"a superconducting electrical circuit that obeyed the laws of quantum mechanics"?


That is a shame actually. If they'd managed to construct (even accidently) a superconducting electrical circuit that disobeyed the laws of quantum mechanics, they'd almost certainly be winning a Nobel Prize.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
I'm no physicist, but am I correct in stating that this following excerpt isn't really saying anything at all?



"a superconducting electrical circuit that obeyed the laws of quantum mechanics"?

"they then used the circuit to give the paddle a push and saw it wiggle"?

and then they 'simply' "put the quantum circuit into a superposition"?

Are they just using the "quantum" catch-word liberally or something in stupid ways? They're not explaining how anything was done whatsoever that I can tell. If they truly were able to put a large object into a state of superposition, wouldn't they at least try to explain it better? Perhaps it's just a crappilly written article or something ... am I missing something?

Whoa there Tex!

Don't judge the science by the pop science article!

Unfortunately the link at the the school seems to be down!
http://www.physics.ucsb.edu/~clelandgroup/

Must be too much traffic.
 
Are they just using the "quantum" catch-word liberally or something in stupid ways? They're not explaining how anything was done whatsoever that I can tell. If they truly were able to put a large object into a state of superposition, wouldn't they at least try to explain it better? Perhaps it's just a crappilly written article or something ... am I missing something?

No, it really is a quantum state of this big vibrating bar. They are able to put it into the ground state |0>, then into the first excited state |1> ("one phonon"), then into the second |2> ("two phonons") etc. Then, just like you can do with an atom or a nuclear spin or whatever, they were able to put it into states of mixed phonon number, like |0> + i|2> (a superposition of the ground state and a large-amplitude-vibration state).
 
Well, isn't it true that a bowling ball as a particle actually has a wave function (allbeit incredibly tiny)?
 
quantum bowling ball is hypothetical - The chance of a double split experiment happening with bowling balls is 1 in a zillion to the zillionth, etc

but 60 carbon atoms as a 'fullerene' - 1 nanometer across - kinda 'big' - apparently has been used for double split experiments.

http://hexagon.physics.wisc.edu/tea...nger large molecule interference ajp 2003.pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fullerene


quiz monday ;)
Oooo good stuff! So if the peeps in the OP experiment actually did put their "drum" in a state of superposition, it would then be the largest known "thing" to exhibit wave-particle duality outside the fullerine. Yes?
 
I'm waiting to read the original paper in its entirety. Unfortunately, it isn't yet available at the research group's webpage. Has anyone seen, or can you provide a link to, the original?
 

Back
Top Bottom