Science American magazine changes view on Evolution and Creationism.

Dylab

Critical Thinker
Joined
Nov 28, 2002
Messages
313
From the Panda's Thumb quoting the new April magazine of Science American:

In retrospect, this magazine’s coverage of so-called evolution has been hideously one-sided. For decades, we published articles in every issue that endorsed the ideas of Charles Darwin and his cronies.

Moreover, we shamefully mistreated the Intelligent Design (ID) theorists by lumping them in with creationists. Creationists believe that God designed all life, and that’s a somewhat religious idea. But ID theorists think that at unspecified times some unnamed superpowerful entity designed life, or maybe just some species, or maybe just some of the stuff in cells. That’s what makes ID a superior scientific theory: it doesn’t get bogged down in details.
…

Get ready for a new Scientific American. … This magazine will be dedicated purely to science, fair and balanced science, not just the science that scientists say is science.


I thought you guys might get a kick out of it as much as I did.
 
I got my issue today...
Good journalism values balance above all else. We owe it to our readers to present everybody's ideas equally and not to ignore or discredit theories simply because they lack scientifically credible arguments or facts. Nor should we succumb to the easy mistake of thinking that scientists understand their fields better than, say U.S. senators or best-selling novelists do.

..snip..

No more discussions of how policies affect science either --- so what if the budget for the National Science Foundation is slashed? This magazine will be dedicated purely to science, fair and balanced science, and not just the science that scientists say is science. And it will start on April Fools' Day.

Isn't selective quoting fun! The whole editorial is a hoot!
 
Science American? I was going to point out that I had never heard of it, then I see in the quote that you meant to say Scientific American.
 

Back
Top Bottom