ROSS KELLY, Gematria Addict

[KRAMER]

This just in, ALSO from Kerala, India, and also addressed identically to the previous applicant, Ms. McGuckin, c/o the Kerala India Post Office, General Delivery. Hmmmm...I wonder....

==============================================

Dear Mr. Randi,

The Iron rod PH key anagrams are synchronized to time itself by time herself and they contain a synchronized plan designed to prove the reality of the single bipolar intelligence that creates the whole of reality.

The ANA code is also known as the 11 code because 1 represents God and the second 1 represents mankind. The letters P & H are interchangeable in the simple code.

The rpoof is being provided by the key's links to the town of OBAN in Argyll Scotland and its predetermined ability to date specific events like the storm that hit OBAN 1-12-05 dated in the key anagrams by the word OBANS.

I date OBANS storm in this R. Kely code plan.
This Kely code pins OBAN rainstorm date.
OBANS Kelly code tip pins rainstorm date.
I help ID R Kely OBANS contains storm date.
OBANS O clearly demonstrated - PSI - I think.
OBANS clear o tip demonstrated PSI.
THINK OBANS IO clearly demonstrated PSI.
R. Kelly's phonetics - I dated a storm in OBAN.
I DATES A STORM IN OBAN AS R. KELLY PHONETICS.

The code is known as PSY or PSI because it demonstrates the mental link between its creator and humanity.

The same key dates this challenge to you by the date 1.2.05 and states very clearly that it is INTENDED as the date of the challenge in the predetermined anagrams of the key. The date of 1.2.05 is represented in the numerological alphabet by the letters A.B.ON it's an anagram of OBAN.

You may first assume that I picked the date to fit the OBAN letters but if that were the case why should the full key anagrams that date the challenge conform to that date too?

The key also predicts the arrival of an asteroid in that place and another one in BOWEN Queensland Australia. It clearly shows the words CROW and LION as coded dates are linked in some way to that event. Those words both contain the numbers 3905.

blah blah blah, etc etc etc... ..............................

===========================================

There are about 10 more pages of this. I can't type them all out here. Sorry...

Dear Mr. Kelly,

We are in receipt of your JREF Paranormal Challenge application. We reject it and ask that you send us no more printed materials. We will NOT read them. They prove absolutely NOTHING.

You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the very nature of the Challenge. Please read the Challenge rules at our website (www.randi.org) if you remain confused about this. If you still have questions, please seek the answers in the accompanying Challenge FAQ.

ONLY A DEMONSTRATION WILL SUFFICE. That's the first thing you need to comrehend.

The paperwork you sent means nothing to us, and supports NONE of your claims, whatever they may be.

Your text interpretations also mean nothing to us, nor would they to any scientist. They serve only to support your delusions, and to that effect, we cannot help you in any way.

We wish you the very best in your search for the truth, while we suggest that you seek it elsewhere. We are quite certain that you will not find it if you continue on your present path.

-Kramer, JREF Paranormal Claims Dept.

=============================================

And that's our 307th CLOSED file.

 

[KRAMER]

A Complaint

Dear Mr. Randi and all JREF staff,

This is a complaint that I would like you to actually consider.

Today I made a discovery that quite honestly I can only say appalls me.

A friend brought a report from your website for me to have a look at that revealed a horrifying thing..

Since I sent you a response to your challenge that as I now know, was received by you and replied to by you on 11th March 2005 I have been labouring under the illusion that you actually took the time to study it before rejecting it out of hand as you did.

It was posted to you from India on 1.2.05, forty one days before your reply was posted.

I assumed when I received that reply that some of the time between the two dates had actually been used to properly study and assess the material I had sent to you; after all, you do claim that you investigate every claim.

I now find that no such thing occurred, as Kramer has shown by the times stated on his reports that less than two hours was spent between dealing with the claim before mine which was a very simple claim written clearly in English and yet, even that, Mr. Kramer had to later concede he had misread (which clearly shows the lack of attention applied to claims material) and my claim that required a great deal of thoughtful attention to grasp. This is quite ridiculous.

In order to understand the subtle complexity of the proof contained in that material it required serious study by somebody mentally qualified to do so.

An expert on the scientifically understood laws of probability for instance, a man gifted with the ability to reach a conclusion by the use of applied reason.

My material was glanced at and arrogantly dismissed just because a closed minded contemptuous and arrogant fool could not be bothered to look at it and then misrepresented on your website without a qualm.

This makes a bit of a joke about your supposed real challenge don’t you think?

If you don’t look at a thing properly how can you possibly assess its value?

When that document was ignored and then rubbished by your representative you missed the opportunity to see something of profound value that has now been even more profoundly and genuinely proven by recent catastrophic events.

Does the truth not concern you at all Mr. Randi, don’t you want the honest answer?

The thing I have tried to provide you with is the proof you profess to be looking for yet your cynicism seems to be blocking your ability to see it.

I expect that you are so tired of dealing with nonsense claims that you are not expecting ever to come upon anything other than such, and so it is to some degree understandable that full attention is not given to the worthy thing when it arrives. It is an unexpected visitor that goes unrecognised - perhaps.

If it is the case that you really don’t know the value of the proof I have been sending you I strongly urge you to take another look with no pre-conceived negative expectation to put you off.

There really is a great deal more at stake than just a million dollars here and you are doing yourself no favour at all if you don’t take the time to understand why.

Please respect my request and take that time now because it really does matter.

I am not a juvenile and there is nothing juvenile about the material I have recently sent to you a little more of which is being sent today. Its proof is self-evident, here’s one little demonstration of it.

HALLOWEEN DATE - R.K TIPS RANDI BY IT - 31.10.05.

R.K'S TIDY HALLOWEEN RANDI BETA TIP - 31.10.05.

31.10.05 RANDI TIP, R.K DATES HALLOWEEN BY IT.

If it is the case that you have deleted the emails sent to you in the past week you will find them on the www.timesfinalrose.org website under James Randi's Anson deadline Wilma demonstration.

Some things really are worthy of respect even in this world.

This thing that you so childishly rejected in your recent email is actually the thing that proves that the life of James Randi is a very important life indeed.

That fact too is worthy of your respect. If you can’t respect it, who will? Kramer?

You really do need to fully understand that it is not me that is behind this demonstration and you will see that clearly if you take that time to look at it and the damage that is all around you.

Ross Kelly

 

[KRAMER]

Hello?

SOME ADDITIONAL HELP FOR MR KRAMER. 31.10.05.

And a challenge to a Skeptic cheat.

I challenge James Randi to put the whole recent sequence of emails that I have sent him including this one, starting with the verification of the Anson deadline in the email dated 16.10.05, on his website along with his reason for his denial of their value and the reason for his contemptuous replies and a valid reason for the refusal to properly investigate and test the original OBANS storm proof he was sent.

It contained predictions in dated emails that were proven to be correct by that OBAN storm on the OBANS date.

Mr. Randi, your promise is that JREF investigate every response to your challenge sent to you seriously, yet the evidence on your own website proves that you did not do so as you rejected complex material within less than an hour and a half after your receipt of it without taking the time to study what it contained and without having mathematicians and statisticians or qualified experts assess it at all.

You claim that I sent you Gematria when I sent you an anagram key. That alone is proof that my claim was not examined properly.

Gematria is the study of the numerical values of words and phrases and their links to each other. You grossly misrepresented the material I sent to you by typing a few lines that did not in themselves demonstrate my proof in mixed case type as if they had been sent to you that way.

You did not even state what my claim is.

It really is a shameful way to behave, totally unscientific and totally disrespectful.

It is impossible to judge my claim without studying it properly.

It certainly APPEARS that you have no idea at all what you have been sent. Perhaps that was intentional. 'Oh sorry we didn’t notice'

This is highly unprofessional conduct that makes a mockery of your challenge. It is not right behaviour at all and it is grossly unfair if not criminally negligent.

It is certainly a breach of promise.

I will re- send you the whole thing by email so that you have no typing to do to represent it on your site properly as you have not done if you agree to my request.

If you have nothing to fear from my claim let the people see it for themselves as it really was along with the recent developments that utterly verify it so that they may actually know what was refused.

I suggest that Mr. Kramer has a serious personality problem that is not helpful to the genuine application of your responsibility to claimants.

This additional aid might help him.

31.10.05 ADDS TO TEN BY THE II CI PLAN KRAMER.

HELP KRAMER TO ADD BY 31.10.05 IN CI - IT'S A TEN.

I CAN HELP KRAMER TO ADD BY 31.10.05 - IT IS TEN.

The key doesn’t just help poor Mr. Kramer to do this, it does it with his favorite storm date in Central America.

HELP KRAMER TO ADD BY 31.10.05 IN C.A - IT IS TEN.

The date was made to be significant by BETA in C.A.

The numbers 3 1 1 5 add up to 10 and that in turn is numerologically ONE.

31.10.05 - I CAN HELP KRAMER ADD BY IT - IT IS ONE.

The thing about this is that the numbers in that date and the mathematical statements about them work in the key anagrams with one name - KRAMER.

While at the same time pointing out the fact that he needs help to think about obvious things.

31.10.05 - IT CAN HELP KRAMER BY SET ADDITION.

I CAN HELP 31.10.05 TEST KRAMER BY ADDITION.

I CAN HELP KRAMER TEST 31.10.05 BY ADDITION.

If he can’t figure out what that means I'll try to help...

It means that you can check whether the date you have been so ingeniously given was given by a mind that knows what it is doing, by adding up the numbers in the date yourself and seeing if the key is correct when it states that your BETA storm date adds up to ten and ultimately one.

If you have difficulty in doing this (as it is more than two numbers) ask Mr. Randi to get a calculator and help yoU.

That shouldn’t really prove to be the difficult part, that comes (for you) when you try to figure out what it means that it does this because you have an inbuilt opposition to the purpose of reason that has been made apparent by every communication I ever received from you. Sadly - it's your problem.

LEARN BY REASON THIS CODE'S TOLD - THINK - I AM.

R.K TIMED NICARAGUA, IT'S DONE BY THE 31.10.05. (P-G-7, L-U-3)

RANDI'S REPLY LINKS WITH 30.10.05 BETA DATE.

Randi's unfriendly reply received by us on 29.10.05 was responded to by the Beta link on 30th.

THE RANDI PLAN, R.K TIMES IT BY A CODE - 31.10.05.

KIT, IT PR'S 31.10.05 RANDI DATE BY - HALLOWEEN.

HALLOWEEN DATE - R.K TIPS RANDI BY IT - 31.10.05.

R.K'S TIDY HALLOWEEN RANDI BETA TIP - 31.10.05.

31.10.05 RANDI TIP, R.K DATES HALLOWEEN BY IT.

THE RANDI STORM LESSON CODE LINK TIP BY AA.

THE RANDI CI LINK LESSON BY A STORM DATE OP.

CIA LESSON BY THE RANDI STORM DATE LINK OP.

It's another way in which God is warning the CIA that their refusal to tell the world the truth is causing the destructions to have to occur.

I TEACH RANDI STORM DATE LINK OP LESSON.

I SHOCK RANDI BY A STORM, THE NELSON DETAIL.

Wilma hit Cancun on the anniversary of the battle of Trafalgar in which Lord Nelson died as the code's designer who just proved she can add up to Ten also proved that she knows.

See MURDOCH'S WIND PROBLEM

25.10.05. Just before the current link to Randi started.

I HELP SORT IAN BY A NELSON STORM DATE DICK.

For Cressida Dick re - Ian Blair.

RANDI - SMITH IN R.KELLY 31.10.05 BETA DATE OP.

Randi's fellow skeptic Dick Smith was also sent the proof.

31.10.05 - PRESENTLY RANDI BETA O DICK SMITH.

That's to show Dick Smith that on that date the code subjects would be Randi and Beta -as they are. Note that it is pre-organised specially for Dick (and Dick).

31.10.05 - PRESENTLY O BEAT RANDI, DICK SMITH.

LOOK DICK SMITH -OBANS DATE PRESENTLY RANDI CI.

When Shirley looked at the Australian Geographic website for an email address she saw a picture of Dick Smith making a presentation to Andy Thomas.

This is a presentation too.

It's a ...

DICK SMITH PRESENTATION BY SOLE LORD ANA.

O REALLY BONDS A DICK SMITH PRESENTATION.

REAL LADY'S 2005 DICK SMITH PRESENTATION.

A HELL WIND PRESENTATION TO A DICK BY ROSS.

Cressida Dick is a detective.

ANDY THOMAS PRESENTATION BILL ROSE DICK.

A bill in the Rose code for Mr. Smith.

9 ROCK BELL ID'S ANDY THOMAS PRESENTATION.

This code, the II Bell, has previously warned that 9 asteroids may be used to end Earth's negativity problem and that RIO is the site of one potential strike.

DICK'S ANDY THOMAS PRESENTATION RIO BELL.

ANDY THOMAS PRESENTATION - RE DICK'S O BILL.

PRESENTLY RANDI BETA O DICK SMITH - LA SOON.

 

[KRAMER]

It has been decided that the JREF will post no further ramblings from Ross Kelley.