• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Rosemary Hunter...

WillM

New Blood
W
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Messages
20
Re: Rosemary Hunter

Ok, I'll bite (pun intended) did she make the one person cry uncontrollably by eating onions and breathing on them or does she just smell bad? If the ability to make people urinate themselves or cry uncontrollaby by paranormal means exists, it would not be an ability I would brag about.
 
One other point occurred to me: how long does she have to focus her "power" before it kicks in? I mean, if I'm sitting as her subject for three or four hours, I might well need to go to the toilet; is she then going to claim victory for herself?
 
I have no idea what is spoken of her - but I will assume that this is not in reference to either (?)(given time-frame between references could be same Rosemary Hunter) Rosemary Hunter of literary or legal situation in Australia.
 
I'm fine with it but her explanation seems somehow strange. I wonder where she got the idea that as one of God's angels, you can make people cry and/or urinate. But maybe she serves another God than the one most people would think of... The God of Bodyfluids. Hm. That could be a great title for a porn movie.
 
I can assure you that Rosemary's powers are 100% genuine. Merely reading about her claims caused the tears to trickle down my face AND my legs.
 
Out of curiosity, I wonder if she's ever attempted the result on a person with renal failure. That would be impressive.
 
I would just like to express my admiration for RemieV for continuing Kramer's difficult job of thinking up titles for threads about people like this. So far "paranormal urination" has to be one of my favourites.
 
I think it's a simple misunderstanding. Her doctor actually said, "You're a diabetic." Not "you're a diuretic."
 
Ms. Hunter says that she will need one-half hour with each of the volunteers.

And, in the case of the crying phenomenon, it is uncontrollable sobbing. Not just tears on one's cheeks ;)
 
I don't like the idea of randomising what she will try to do. You should pick one, preferably one that isn't too uncomfortable for the victims volunteers, and stick with it. You don't necessarily have to tell the participants what she will be trying to do if you are worried about them actively trying to avoid it. I would recommend putting them to sleep as the best choice.
 
I talked about this person's claims in a phone conversation with Jim Underdown of the IIG. It is anecdotal, so discount it accordingly.

Jim had a phone conversation with her in which she said she could make him cry profusely, pee in his pants or fall asleep within five minutes of starting the trial. Jim agreed to wave all protocols and said the IIG prize was hers if she could do it. They set up a time and place to meet.

Jim said he made sure to whiz a half hour ahead of time and awaited her arrival. The test was on.....






















....she did not show up.
 
SezMe said:
I talked about this person's claims in a phone conversation with Jim Underdown of the IIG. It is anecdotal, so discount it accordingly.

Jim had a phone conversation with her in which she said she could make him cry profusely, pee in his pants or fall asleep within five minutes of starting the trial. Jim agreed to wave all protocols and said the IIG prize was hers if she could do it. They set up a time and place to meet.

Jim said he made sure to whiz a half hour ahead of time and awaited her arrival. The test was on.....






















....she did not show up.
Click to expand...

Thanks, SezMe.

Do you know if she has offered an explanation for her no-show? And when did this happen?
 
GzuzKryzt said:
Do you know if she has offered an explanation for her no-show?
Click to expand...
When I spoke with Jim he had had no further contact with her as far as I know so the answer for now must be "no".

GzuzKryzt said:
And when did this happen?
Click to expand...
It happened when I called Jim to talk about Guska's (edge's) application for the IIG prize. So that makes it in the late July time frame. Sorry, can't nail it down any closer than that.
 
SezMe said:
When I spoke with Jim he had had no further contact with her as far as I know so the answer for now must be "no".


It happened when I called Jim to talk about Guska's (edge's) application for the IIG prize. So that makes it in the late July time frame. Sorry, can't nail it down any closer than that.
Click to expand...

Late July, that's close enough.

You probably would have done it anyway without me asking, but for the sake of letting the readers know: When you have a chance, please ask Jim Underdown for a follow-up on Ms. Hunter's contact status. I'm pretty sure she still hasn't contacted him or came up with some lame excuse. It's anecdotal at best but provides an impression we so often encounter with these folks, doesn't it?
 
Thanks for the reminder, GzuzKryzt. I tentatively plan to attend the IIG meeting this coming Saturday (Aug 18) and I'll raise the Hunter contact status at that time.
 
In regards to RemieV's updates on Ms. Hunter possible test I'd like to say:

1. Take one claim. Why not stick with the urination?
2. Five to ten subjects, let her decide if gender and age, medical history, etc. are relevant.
3. Go with diapers or bathing costumes.
4. 30 minutes, to pee or not to pee. (Hey, it's for science, right?)

Piece of urinal cake.
 
If this one get to a test, I think it should be filmed as an episode of MythBusters.

IXP
 
RemieV, I'm not sure why the 30 minute requirement. She told Underdown she'd have him hosing his drawers in 5 minutes. See if you can negotiate the time span down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom