Remember these bumper stickers?: "Buy American!"

Iamme

Philosopher
Joined
Aug 5, 2003
Messages
6,215
Hmmmm. Today, our economy is being shipped to China. People are being layed off in droves. What should we do? Where is that battlecry..."Buy American!" ???

We had Mexico/NAFTA. Then all got quiet on the homefront after all the hoopla settled down. Now, it is with us again, with a vengeance.

Your thoughts please?
 
Is Wal-Mart Too Powerful?
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_40/b3852001_mz001.htm

Here's a nice example of what the "service" industry model offers.

In business, there is big, and there is Wal-Mart. With $245 billion in revenues in 2002, Wal-Mart Stores (WMT ) Inc. is the world's largest company. It is three times the size of the No. 2 retailer, France's Carrefour. Every week, 138 million shoppers visit Wal-Mart's 4,750 stores; last year, 82% of American households made at least one purchase at Wal-Mart. "There's nothing like Wal-Mart," says Ira Kalish, global director of Deloitte Research. "They are so much bigger than any retailer has ever been that it's not possible to compare."

Wal-Mart controls a large and rapidly increasing share of the business done by most every major U.S. consumer-products company: 28% of Dial (DL ) total sales, 24% of Del Monte Foods (DLM )', 23% of Clorox', 23% of Revlon (REV )'s, and on down the list. Suppliers' growing dependence on Wal-Mart is "a huge issue" not only for manufacturers but also for the U.S. economy, says Tom Rubel, CEO of consultant Retail Forward Inc. "If [Wal-Mart] ever stumbles, we've got a potential national security problem on our hands. They touch almost everything....If they ever really went into a tailspin, the dislocation would be significant and traumatic."

Of course, their repeated business model where they move into an area, open up five convenient stores near several town centers, destroy every downtown business they can by simply pricing far below what anyone else can based on their monopolistic power until everyone in a retail business is bankrupt, and then just up and close shop on four of the five stores when they have their position consilidated isn't "bad". It's only smart business. The fact that now people have to drive 10 or 20 miles to shop doesn't matter. It was their own choice that made it happen. Obviously they wanted to drive the extra half hour to do their grocery shopping, and only have Wal*Mart to buy their clothes and shoes from.

Oh, look, a site dedicated to the beast...
http://www.walmartwatch.com/neighbor/
http://www.walmartwatch.com/bad/internal.cfm?subsection_id=111&internal_id=338
http://www.walmartwatch.com/bad/page.cfm?subsection_id=108
 
I agree with the following statements from this article:

Most “Buy American” advocates are motivated by misplaced patriotism. But for some the motive is a collectivist hostility towards foreigners. This xenophobic attitude is thoroughly un-American; it is plain bigotry.

Giving preference to American-made products over German or Japanese products is the same injustice as giving preference to products made by whites over those made by blacks. Economic nationalism, like racism, means judging men and their products by the group from which they come, not by merit.

Collectivism reflects the notion that life is "a zero sum game," that we live in a dog-eat-dog world, where one man’s gain is another man’s loss. On this premise, everyone has to cling to his own herd and fight all the other herds for a share of a fixed, static, supply of goods. And that is exactly the premise of the “Buy American” campaign. “It’s Japan or us,” is the implication. If Japan is getting richer, then we must be getting poorer.

But individualism recognizes that wealth is produced, not merely appropriated, and that man’s rise from the cave to the skyscraper demonstrates that life is not a zero-sum game — not where men are free to seek progress.

Accordingly, individualism holds that the interests of men do not conflict — provided we are speaking of self-supporting individuals who pay for what they get. Where there is free trade, the exchange of value for value, one man’s gain is another man’s gain.
 
I knew the above was written by a Randroid after the word "collectivist" appeareda second time.

One reason for buying products made in America rather than by children in oppressive third world regimes is, well, working conditions. Though in capitalism we're not supposed to consider the plight of others. Self-interest and "rationality" obviate those concerns. If two products are identical, but one has a lower price, then we're supposed to buy whatever is cheaper. The more expensive product might have been made in less gruesome working conditions, or maybe the factory is more friendly to the local environment, or maybe the company refuses to deal with dictators. After-thoughts.


From a recent article in the TIMES: "[Wal-Mart] imported $12 billion in goods from China last year, one-tenth of American imports from China."
 
Malachi151---Thanks for that site. Good read. I recommend everyone here to read it.

It really paints a picture that we are creating indentured servants of ours all over the world. That said...how can these Muslim nations that we are engaged with right now, look favorably upon us?
 

Back
Top Bottom