• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Randi in March 1st Time

Azathoth

Scholar
Joined
May 13, 2003
Messages
118
Didn't see this posted anywhere. There's a little sidebar on p.14 with a picture of Randi concentrating his mental powers while holding a spoon. Text as follows:

Certified Superfreak [?]

Think you have supernatural powers? The Million Dollar Paranormal Challenge is for anyone who can "show, under proper observing conditions, evidence of any paranormal, supernatural, or occult, power." According to James Randi, the magician/escape artist who organizes the event, hundreds inquire each year -- but only about a half dozen take the test (register at Randi.org). No one's won the cash, but, as the early rounds of American Idol have proved, you don't need talent for good TV: the Challenge was made into a show in South Korea and Randi's headed to Germany this fall. Applicants in Sount Korea, writes Randi, included "X-ray eyes people, magnetic people, spoon benders, people who find lost animals, and even a man from Malaysia who lit up a fluorescent tuyve he held between his fingers." Randi's not without detractors. While he insists he conducts fair, double-blind tests, Gary Schwartz, a universioty of Arizona professor and an expert on the paranormal, says Randi alters testing parameters. "The phenomena are very sensitive," says Schwartz, "He doesnt optimize conditions." Mike Guska, who failed to prove he could find gold, agrees. he says taking the Challenge in an office threw off his channeling ability. Guska wants to retake it: "They're going to have to come to me."

Sorry about the spelling.
Not bad, though the writing is substandard and the Schwartz bit rankles. Is non-optimizing the same as altering? And in any case, everyone agrees beforehand about what will be done and under what conditions.
 
I couldn't find it on their website, must only be the paper issues. I love the idea of a Skeptic reality show though! I'd watch a weekly parade of contenders go for the gold. Gotta be better than 'Forever Eden', where I find myself wishing they'd toss a homicidal maniac into the social mix...
 
While he insists he conducts fair, double-blind tests, Gary Schwartz, a universioty of Arizona professor and an expert on the paranormal, says Randi alters testing parameters. "The phenomena are very sensitive," says Schwartz, "He doesnt optimize conditions."

...for what?

"Alters" testing parameters? No, leaks are closed.

Kopji said:
I couldn't find it on their website, must only be the paper issues. I love the idea of a Skeptic reality show though! I'd watch a weekly parade of contenders go for the gold. Gotta be better than 'Forever Eden', where I find myself wishing they'd toss a homicidal maniac into the social mix...

You'd only get the nutcases, thereby creating a convenient excuse for those who do not go on TV: "Hey, I may be talking to dead people, but I'm not crazy like that guy on Channel 17.....(so I must be real, right?)"

They will never admit on TV what they tell their victims in private. We've had examples here in DK, where numerologists say pretty harsh things to people (hidden cameras), but when they know they are on camera, they water it down (to a homeopathic explanation, one might say!), so it doesn't sound dangerous in any way.
 
Thanks,
Yeah, probably lots of logistics problems. I'd watch though. :)

I wonder if that 'nutty' tendency would gradually decrease over time. People would see fakes on TV, and decide they had a much better case and apply.

A weekly parade of would-be-psychics might start people wondering where the celebrities are.

People are more relaxed and 'themselves' even with a hidden camera they know about.

Perhaps the hard part would be to get the media to promote a skeptic show. They make so much money pandering to believers in the paranormal I can't see them killing their golden goose.
 

Back
Top Bottom