• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Question

jackchit

Banned
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
156
Why do you never debate Alex Jones? I've always wondered.
There is no screw terrorstorm and he gets far less attention from de-bunkers than the soft targets like Avery and fetzer.
Just asking.:confused:
 
terrorstorm gets far less attention that loose change

and alex jones gets plenty of play here, just use the search, yuoll find lots of stuff
 
For the same reason we don't debate the crazy homeless dude on the street corner ringing the bell and holding the sign saying, "The end is nigh".
 
I'd love to see someone debate Alex Jones. Hell, I could do it.


Alex Jones: IT'S BEEN CONFIRMED!!!

Me: By whom?

Alex Jones: ...
 
Why do you never debate Alex Jones? I've always wondered.
There is no screw terrorstorm and he gets far less attention from de-bunkers than the soft targets like Avery and fetzer.
Just asking.:confused:

Is Perry Logan's website still active? That's a pretty hefty 'Screw Alex Jones' right there.

When I was on USENET, I was told to watch the various 'No Boeing at Pentagon' films. Flaws were found, massive mistakes.

The truth crowd said 'well, its just a short film' what you really need to do is watch Loose Change!

Loose Change was watched. Massive flaws were found, huge mistakes, ridiculous claims were exposed, and Avery was made a fool of in debates.

Before the smoke clear we were told 'Why waste your time with Loose Change? That's kids stuff! You really want to impress us then take on the Scholars for 911 truth!

So our attention turned to the Scholars. They were found to be absurd, their claims failed to hold water. Their leaders had feats of clay. Jones was shown to be wrong, Wood incompetent, and Fetzer just plain made statements that were ludicrous. The Scholars split into factions.

The troother's (the same ones who cheered with Fetzer declared he would beat the hijackers to death with his luggade) said 'Fetzers' a lightweight', 'he doesn't represent the movement', they whined.

And so the attention turned to others, but it had been on them the whole time.

Why don't you do a search of this very forum for the antics of Alex Jones?
 
Why do you never debate Alex Jones? I've always wondered.
There is no screw terrorstorm and he gets far less attention from de-bunkers than the soft targets like Avery and fetzer.
Just asking.:confused:

You think ranting the same old tired ******** down a loudhailer makes him any more impressive?
Louder doesnt necessarily mean better.
And quantity doesnt always equate to quality.
 
Last edited:
Wait I thought we weren't supposed to take Gravy seriously because he's only a tour guide, what qualifications does Alex Jones have?
 
So if I could arrange it do you think Mark would be up for a debate with Alex? I will contact Jones people and document their responses for the benefit of clarity.
 
So if I could arrange it do you think Mark would be up for a debate with Alex? I will contact Jones people and document their responses for the benefit of clarity.

He has debated him actually. Old school on the streets. Haha.
 
Wait I thought we weren't supposed to take Gravy seriously because he's only a tour guide, what qualifications does Alex Jones have?
According to the video that apparently was taken down.....at GZ in the subway Alex Jones says "HELP ME I'M STUPID", is that qualification any good?
 
So if I could arrange it do you think Mark would be up for a debate with Alex? I will contact Jones people and document their responses for the benefit of clarity.
You do realize that without the ability to turn off Gravy's mic, Alex jones has no chance whatsoever.
 
Alex Jones: 9/11 was an inside job.
Debunker: Prove it.
Alex Jones: (grabs bullhorn) 9/11 was an inside job!!
Debunker: (plugs ears) prove it.
Alex Jones: (puts horn to debunkers ear) 9/11 was an inside job!!!!!!


That is why noone wants to debate Alex Jones.

TAM:)
 
So if I could arrange it do you think Mark would be up for a debate with Alex? I will contact Jones people and document their responses for the benefit of clarity.

They have debated at ground zero. Jones appeared clueless on the matter of WTC7, and continually lied by saying he never claimed that the FDNY were part of the inside job.
 
So if I could arrange it do you think Mark would be up for a debate with Alex? I will contact Jones people and document their responses for the benefit of clarity.

And if its agreed, do you think Alex might just use some his video sales money and pay for his airline ticket himself, unlike Fetzer?
If not, then are you and your troofer buddies going to help stump up his airfare this time?
How about you front the amount Jason, then do a whip round?
 
Alex Jones: 9/11 was an inside job.
Debunker: Prove it.
Alex Jones: (grabs bullhorn) 9/11 was an inside job!!
Debunker: (plugs ears) prove it.
Alex Jones: (puts horn to debunkers ear) 9/11 was an inside job!!!!!!


That is why noone wants to debate Alex Jones.

TAM:)

So the answer is no then.
Shame I was looking forward to Roberts shutting this guy up.
Oh well the "he's too stupid to debate" excuse runs both ways.
You are beginning to look like cowards and we wouldn't want that to happen so I'll drop the jones issue as its clearly too hot to handle.
BTW I had a good birthday thanks.:)
 
I was making a general comment, my opinion. If Mark wants to waste his time debating a loud mouth like jones, who is as illiterate as Fetzer on the real issues, than let him. We could use the entertainment...dance monkey dance, or more like "yell monkey yell" so to speak.

TAM:)
 
They have debated at ground zero. Jones appeared clueless on the matter of WTC7, and continually lied by saying he never claimed that the FDNY were part of the inside job.

Hey mancman i see you're in manchester, why don't you come see me in Bury on a thursday night.
I play some good tunes and the chicks are awesome, so if they'll let you out come over i'll buy you a lager & lime.
 
So the answer is no then.
Shame I was looking forward to Roberts shutting this guy up.
Oh well the "he's too stupid to debate" excuse runs both ways.
You are beginning to look like cowards and we wouldn't want that to happen so I'll drop the jones issue as its clearly too hot to handle.
BTW I had a good birthday thanks.:)

are you 4 years old. Who do really expect to bait here with that lame attempt to "call us out" with the coward comment. This is grown up time jack...grow up and join us.

TAM
 

Back
Top Bottom