• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Pyramids - Egypt/Yucatan Connection?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Checkmite

Skepticifimisticalationist
Joined
Jun 7, 2002
Messages
29,007
Location
Gulf Coast
<table cellspacing=1 cellpadding=6 bgcolor=#666699 border=0><tr><td bgcolor=white><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color=#666699 size=2>Introduction by moderator Luke T.: Link to original topic:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21966
</font></td></tr></table>





The ancient Egyptians and the Mayans both built pyramids - including some impressively large ones. Could the Mayans have been inspired by the Egyptian pyramids? Could there be a common cultural link between the two - a source independent of either, yet inspiring to both?

The short answer is no. The long and more detailed answer follows.

First of al, in case anyone wants to contest the Egyptians' claim to being the original pyramid builders, or that the Great Pyramid itself was built by them, let's take a look at how pyramids in Egypt evolved.

Thus, we begin in Egypt, around the year 2600 BCE. It's only the 3rd Dynasty; united Upper and Lower Egypt is still a fresh concept. Up until this point, Egyptians had been burying their noble dead in mastabas - low brick monuments which distinguished the upper class from the common class - who were buried under piles of rocks. After a few kings had passed on and been laid to rest in their mastabas - well, there were a number of mastabas about. Kings started having bigger and bigger mastabas built for them, so that people who walked by would be able to tell the difference between this king and his weaker predecessors. However, one day a king named Djoser had a rather inspired plan - one that was sure to make people remember his name for years. Something huge, and tall. He set his architects to work, and they drafted a plan for the first step pyramid - essentially a series of progressively smaller mastabas built on top of each other. The result was - for its time - magnificent.

16.gif


Of course, it wasn't really a pyramid - but it was the beginning of a beautiful friendship between Egyptian kings and big stone pointy things. After Djoser's first step pyramid, several others were built by him and a couple of kings afterwards. Djoser had started a trend!

Flash forward about 90 years. It's now the 4th Dynasty, and a king named Sneferu - probably seeing the fame that the step pyramid builders earned themselves - embarked on something grander. Instead of a rough mastaba, he wanted a smooth, even, and sharply-pointed monument. He also wanted it to be much bigger than anything that had ever been built before. So he sent his planners and laborers feverishly to work. The result was the Pyramid of Meidum, the first true pyramid:

s_meidum.gif


Wait a second, you say...that doesn't look any kind of pyramid at all, much less a true pyramid!

Well, it used to look like a pyramid. Or at least it was about to look like a true pyramid - but something terrible happened. Due to a serious design flaw, the Meidum pyramid collapsed during the final stages of, or soon after, construction. The sides of the pyramid literally slid off, leaving only the zuggerat-shaped stone core we see today. The huge piles of debris seen surrounding the core are the pulverized remains of the pyramid.

But Sneferu was a persistent old chap, and, having corrected his architects, commissioned a second pyramid. This one was built without any serious design flaws...okay, maybe a couple. Halfway up the pyramid, the architects realized that this pyramid would be too steep, too expensive, and take too long to build. So, they abruptly changed the slope of the pyramid, making it more gradual. The stress was still too great, so the engineers designed interior spaces with corbelled ceilings, to help relieve pressure:

bentchamb4.jpg


Of course, at the top (and several other places in the pyramid), there was still more pressure than the engineers were comfortable with; however, by this time they were tired of expending so much effort correcting their mistakes, that they just braced some spots in the interior with cedar beams:

bentport2a.jpg


Yes, boys and girls - that cedar timber in the above photo is original - direct to you from 2570 (or so) BCE.

The result was worth the trouble, however. The Bent Pyramid of Sneferu:

Bent-NW-2001-2.jpg

Bent Pyramid. Height: 105m. Base: 188.6m Slope: 54º, 42º

Sneferu had yet one more pyramid built before he finally gave up the ghost - the Red Pyramid. It was the first complete true pyramid, with corbelled ceilings and the design flaws from the previous pyramid corrected. The Red Pyramid seems a bit flatter than most Egyptian pyramids, because it has a shallower angle - the slope used on the top half of the Bent Pyramid was used for the entirety of the Red Pyramid.

After good old Sneferu died, the king Khufu took the reigns. Khufu literally outdid himself with the biggest "I'll show you!" project of them all - the Great Pyramid.

Some people don't think Khufu built the Great Pyramid. Many people still believe the only thing which attaches Khufu's name to the Great Pyramid is quarrymen's graffiti up high in the King's Chamber. Actually, this isn't true. A nearby "mastaba village" dated to the 4th Dynasty contained many remains and inscriptions, complete with mentions of King Khufu, and titles like "Director of the King's Project", "Overseer of the Side of the Pyramid", and similar titles. A huge work camp near the site of the Giza monuments also dates to the 4th Dynasty and shows evidence of over 50 years of occupation - for good reason; Khafre and Menkaure had their pyramids built right next to Khufu's, in succession. Khafre's and Menkaure's names are all over their pyramids, so it's obvious who built them. Now, Khufu predated Khafre and Menkaure, and heiroglyphic evidence indicates that he commissioned a huge pyramid project. The only pyramid on site that predates Khafre's and Menkaure's pyramids is the Great Pyramid. 2 + 2 = 4, and all that. Plus, the interior of the Great Pyramid features galleries, portcullises, and corbelled ceilings - all methods and features developed - through much trial and error, I hasten to add - by Sneferu's architects. So why wasn't Khufu's body found within his pyramid? Who knows - it could've been stolen, or perhaps he died before the pyramid was completely complete. The latter theory would explain why there's a distinct lack of inscriptions on the walls inside the burial chambers...

gpext98a.jpg

Great Pyramid of Khufu. Height: 146.6m. Base: 230.37m. Slope: 51º

Khafre's pyramid was built on higher ground to make it look taller than Khufu's. It's actually a little shorter. The pyramid also features no corbelled ceilings, because it has only one hall and chamber - at ground level. The rest of the pyramid appears solid. Khafre's pyramid (foreground), interestingly, still has some of its original limestone casing at the top:

khafrep2.jpg

Great Pyramid of Khafre. Height: 136.4m. Base: 215.25m. Slope: 53°

And of course, next comes Menkuare's pyramid, only about 1/4 the size of the others:

menkno.jpg

Pyramid of Menkuare. Height: 62m. Base: 105m. Slope: 51º[/b].

You've been able to see how the Egyptians developed their pyramids, and what they were used for - elaborate tombs. You've seen how they grew from extravagant piles of rock to smooth and precisely-shaped wonders, and you've seen the trial and error their designers went through to reach the pinnacle - the Great Pyramid of Khufu.

With Giza, our trip to ancient Egypt ends. Next, off to Mexico - to compare Egyptian and Mayan pyramids.

Unfortunately, our knowledge about the Maya is limited - and the sort of specifics we have about how particular pyramids were built in Egypt simply doesn't exist for Mayan structures. However, we do know a few things. For example, we know that Mayans never built true pyramids. All their pyramids were of the step variety, and almost exclusively were used as temples for the living, rather than tombs for the dead - the sole exception being the tomb of king Pacal, who was buried beneath the Temple of the Inscriptions at Palenque.

"Temples for the Living" is perhaps a bit of a misnomer, as services at the top of the temples often culminated in rather gruesome and abrupt sacrifices of human victims to please the gods. Mayan temples started out as simple low raised platforms, becoming taller and taller, with varying slopes and bases and heights - in fact, there seems to be no set "paradigm" for Maya pyramids, with the exception that they all had flat tops where the temples were, and of course they all had stairs.

The grand-daddy of Mayan pyramidity is the Temple of the Sun, located at Teotihuacan, where Mexico City now stands.

pyramid_sun.jpg
Pyramid of the Sun. Height: 65m. Base: 228m x 216m. Slope: Unavailable

The Temple of the Sun is huge - it's the 3rd largest pyramid in the world. However, it is most unlikely that the Great Pyramid of Khufu and the Pyramid of the Sun were inspired by the same source. Their bases are similar, to be sure - however, the building method is different, the materials used are different, the applications and reasons for building the pyramids are different, and they don't even look similar - in fact, the Temple of the Sun is less than half the height of Khufu's pyramid.

To summarize - the only true similarity between Egyptian and Maya pyramids is that they start out wide and end narrow. Photos, specifications, and purposes suggest no remote link between the two. Of course, if there's some linking evidence I haven't been made aware of...then by all means, I would be happy to examine it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's an interesting summary. Not sure there's much room there for debate. Now explain how the designs on the Nazca plain were created without help from our alien overlords.
 
Russ said:
That's an interesting summary. Not sure there's much room there for debate. Now explain how the designs on the Nazca plain were created without help from our alien overlords.

*sigh*. No rest for the weary... :D

Maybe later.
 
Very good summary! You omitted a lot of Egyptian pyramids (for simplicity I'm sure) included several unfinished and a couple of more that have collapsed. All together, they have provided us with excellent insight into the cronology and development of Egyptian pyramid architecture.


Hans
 
Mmm, and after all, it is not so surprising that Mayan and Egyptian pyramids have a lot of features in common: Once you've decided to build a large stone monument that is supposed to stand forever, then without access to mortar and concrete, the pyramid shape is really the only feasible option.

Hans
 
One small quibble: The Temple of the Sun is Aztec.

Palenque, Chichen Itza, Uxmal, etc are Mayan.

If Chiapas is ever safe again, I recommend a trip to Palenque. It's one of the most spectacular places on the planet.
 
A few things,

Evidence that there was at least SOME connection between the two cultures, besides their propensity for pyramids.

In mummies in Egypt, there has been numerous traces of Cocaine found, along with tobacco and Cacao (yes, chocolate) in the bindings and bandages. NONE of these are found in the old world, and at the time (we thought) were only found in the america's. How did it get there. I FIRMLY believe that the phoneceins (sp?) had far greater trade routes, and could/were trading with the New World at a time when most of science believes that Britain was as far as they got.

The Nazca lines. Forget aliens. I have read/seen evidence that the Nazca were using balloons (of the hot air variety, lol) to get them up high enough to see/sketch the shapes and drawings. I even watxhed them make one of said balloons on the History channal using only materials that they had (mostly a very strong, lightweight fabric they made) to do it, and they found it was entirely doable.

Back to the mesoamericans and the folks in Egypt. I think it is very likely thatthey had contact with each other at that time (and not via Atlantis or aliens, or whatnot). Their cultures just seem to have too many similarities.

hehe, cocaine mummy's! Middle Kingdom drug dealers. I love it!
 
Oh, also, I have been to Chichen Itza and Kohunlich. Both were GREAT visits if you like Mayan ruins. Kohunlichis much more undeveloped and remote, so if you like it 'natural' you'll like it there. If you like a soda machine, flush toilets and a taco stand nearby, go to Chichen, :)
 
Larspeart said:
The Nazca lines. Forget aliens. I have read/seen evidence that the Nazca were using balloons (of the hot air variety, lol) to get them up high enough to see/sketch the shapes and drawings. I even watxhed them make one of said balloons on the History channal using only materials that they had (mostly a very strong, lightweight fabric they made) to do it, and they found it was entirely doable.
Joe Nickell has demonstrated that they didn't need hot air balloons, but rather stakes and rope, both of which were available.
Check out his articles in Skeptical Inquirer. In one, he recreates a full sized Nasca figure without the use of a flying saucer, or an almost equally improbable hot air balloon.
 
Kullervo said:
One small quibble: The Temple of the Sun is Aztec.

Palenque, Chichen Itza, Uxmal, etc are Mayan.

If Chiapas is ever safe again, I recommend a trip to Palenque. It's one of the most spectacular places on the planet.

Actually you're right - my mistake. The Temple is Aztec, possibly begun as a Toltec structure at first
 
Yeah cocaine in mummies ,yeah right. Care to cite that source, or were they smuggling?

My father a rather famous anthroplogist would like to be able to prove that the Asians and the mesoamericans had contact.

There isn't reallt that much similarites between egypt and maya, did the egytians ritualy torture the pharohs?
 
Jeff Corey said:

Joe Nickell has demonstrated that they didn't need hot air balloons, but rather stakes and rope, both of which were available.
Check out his articles in Skeptical Inquirer. In one, he recreates a full sized Nasca figure without the use of a flying saucer, or an almost equally improbable hot air balloon.

nazca2.jpg

"Sirius 1 on final approach..."

Yes, most archaeologists are of the opinion that neither the alien nor hot air balloon theories are likely; rather, it was most likely done entirely on the ground. The figures are huge, to be sure, but not so huge that one would need a high vantage point to direct their contruction. As Mr. Corey mentions, stakes and rope arranged in a specific fashion would do the trick. The lines themselves were easy to fashion:

nazca3.jpg


All the Nazca had to do was brush away all the dark rock and gravel along the line, exposing the light sand beneath. It should be obvious that any spaceship trying to land on or near such a figure would blast the lines into oblivion. Even landing a small plane on the lines would be disastrous, and several lines have already been severely damaged because tourists drove cars over them.
 
Dancing. . .

Torture them? Not sure on that, but they sure didn't like Nefertiti's corpse.

smashed in the side of her face/head, and tore out her chest cavity. I'd say that is a harsh treatment for a ruler/god.

<table cellspacing=1 cellpadding=6 bgcolor=#666699 border=0><tr><td bgcolor=white><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif" color=#666699 size=2>Moderation Action by Luke T.: Edited out one sentence to maintain level of taste preferred for this sub-forum which did not affect context of post.</font></td></tr></table>
 
Nazca lines...

Regarding the purpose of the Nazca lines, I read somewhere that someone had the idea that they might be used as sort of prayer aides. The idea being you walk along the path of, say, the sacred monkey, and you pray. Does anyone else know anything about this? I can NOT for the life of me remember where I read it! Argh!
 
Great summary. Thanks.

What do you say to the people who claim the Sphinx is older than is conventionally claimed? (Apart from the obvious. ;) )

Is there any reason to think this might be true?
 
Joshua...

What's new about what you wrote? Good post, but it still doesn't prove or disprove anything. I'm still not convinced that there's no correlation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom