Putin: DSK rape charges an "international conspiracy"??

[Thunder]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...nts-at-Dominique-Strauss-Kahn-conspiracy.html


A Jew, former chief of the IMF, and a Jew.

Why would the New World Order take out one of their own? Was he about to reveal incriminating evidence of about 9-11?

Does he know who really killed JFK?

Does he have proof of the faked-moon landings?

And how will CTists deal with their hero, the owner of Russia Today, now defending this NWO agent?

 

[Scott Sommers]

They don't seem to have much to say about it. But I guess that a bunch of young, uneducated white boys probably don't think it's that important. They're too busy looking for important news, like bird deaths and secret Freemasons symbols to pay attention to disinfo like that.

 

[Joey McGee]

The reason the NWO is doing this to him is because he's such a good guy, fighting for the little people, standing up to the big banks, calling for regulation, that is why twoofers are falling over themselves to support him.

 

[uk_dave]

.... in soviet russia the chambermaids rape you.

 

[kageki]

Why don't you ask Putin the CT himself?

 

[Johny2x4]

Why don't you ask Putin the CT himself?

Because Putin is scary..

 

[INRM]

Joey McGee

The reason the NWO is doing this to him is because he's such a good guy, fighting for the little people, standing up to the big banks, calling for regulation, that is why twoofers are falling over themselves to support him.

If that's actually true, that would explain why they would be so quick to manufacture rape charges against him and then swiftly replace him.

 

[Greedo]

joey mcgee

if [they aren't since they don't exist] that's actually true, that would explain why they would be so quick to manufacture rape charges against him and then swiftly replace him.

ftfy

 

[dvictr]

The guy was an advocate for a new "world-currency" that would undermine the US dollar status as the reserve currency of the world. The banking elite/ Rothschild Illuminati together with the CIA set him up. Maybe the maid was an operative or they hired a shill. There are very powerful people that do not want any discussion threatening dollar holdings.

Months ago I would have sworn the IMF was part of the NWO/ CFR/ banking elite but potentially this power struggle was a recent development.

Prostitution is legal in France - Strauss-Kahn doesn't have a problem getting laid. People that are poor, or have raging hormones resort to rape. I live in Brazil and I don't even masturbate anymore. Anytime i need a fix, there is a brothel down the street, cheap call girls 30min away, or hookers around the corner. aggravated Rape/ sexual assault on complete strangers is unheard of in countries where sex is easy, the guy was headed to France. Did he really think he was just gonna walk away from this?

Its absurd that an educated, successful, powerful man would blatantly commit such a viscous crime "in broad daylight". Maybe a dumb college football player/ crack addict would forcibly rape a women, but a high profile executive potentially the next president of France. At the 5 star Sofitel, in Manhattan?

Throw away the tin foil hats because this one is very serious. He could have been assasinated or died in a mysterious car crash, but the scandal will now undermine the IMF as an institution and extend the life of the US dollar.

 

[angrysoba]

Roger Cohen had an op-ed piece about this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/opinion/31iht-edcohen31.html

There are plenty of facts, incidents and complaints — never fully investigated by the French press — to suggest that the serious charges against Strauss-Kahn are not “absurd” and that a young African woman’s voice raised against violent abuse by the powerful should have its day in court.

Bin Laden is dead. The Jews went to work [on 9/11 - My edit]. Suite 2806 is just a number. Facts count. Conspiracy theories are the refuge of the disempowered.

 

[little grey rabbit]

They don't seem to have much to say about it. But I guess that a bunch of young, uneducated white boys probably don't think it's that important. They're too busy looking for important news, like bird deaths and secret Freemasons symbols to pay attention to disinfo like that.

As one of those uneducated white boys can I just say I just see it as a bit of squabble within the elite and not something I should personally concern myself with.

If I read Illuminatus Chris Hitchens (self-infatuated columnists never die, they don't even seem in a hurry to fade away) correctly, it was just a bit of pay-back for the Euros for going after Paul Wolfowitz.

According to Hitchens, Wolfowitz hadnt done anything wrong (obviously lying to the American people isn't doing anything wrong) in regards to his girlfriend at the World Bank and it was all a beat up by the Euros as payback for the neocons and Iraq. This, then, is the neocons striking back.

But outside the normal Illuminati viciousness, backstabbing and betrayal between their own factions, for the rest of us it is about as interesting as the 1936 Terror to the ordinary Russian.

In the famous story, a knock on the door at midnight..."who is it"..."the NKVD, open up."...."Oh you want the communists, they live on the floor above"...."much obliged, sorry to have disturbed you comrade."

 

[JJM 777]

So
a woman (one person)
claims (anecdotal evidence only)
that DSK committed a crime.

Then DSK is thrown to jail, loses his job, slandered in editorials and front pages of the biggest international news magazines, and kept in home arrest.

Then (read: after the damage has been done)
the court finds that the story told by the woman is not true.

Really? How is it possible that a person in the world might tell a story that is not true? So now the courts can no longer take as Truth everything what some obscure person claims about someone else who claims otherwise?

Sadly they still can and will, in thousands of other cases.

 

[SpitfireIX]

So
a woman (one person)
claims (anecdotal evidence only)
that DSK committed a crime.

Are you saying that whenever a woman accuses a man of rape, that the authorities shouldn't take the accusation seriously and investigate the allegations?

Then DSK is thrown to jail

He was not "thrown in jail"; he was arrested as anyone charged with a crime is, after his arraignment he was allowed to post bail and was placed on "home" detention.

loses his job

He chose to resign.

slandered in editorials and front pages of the biggest international news magazines

How is factual reporting of his arrest and the charges against him slander (actually libel)?

Then (read: after the damage has been done)
the court finds that the story told by the woman is not true.

No court has made any such determination. Prosecutors have merely agreed to reduce DSK's bail and ease his (local) movement restrictions because information calling into question the woman's credibility has come to light.

Really? How is it possible that a person in the world might tell a story that is not true?

Again, are you saying that the authorities should never take any allegations of a crime seriously?

So now the courts can no longer take as Truth everything what some obscure person claims about someone else who claims otherwise? Sadly they still can and will, in thousands of other cases.

So because an accuser is obscure, her claims shouldn't be taken seriously?

 

[Childlike Empress]

The guy was an advocate for a new "world-currency" that would undermine the US dollar status as the reserve currency of the world. The banking elite/ Rothschild Illuminati together with the CIA set him up. Maybe the maid was an operative or they hired a shill. There are very powerful people that do not want any discussion threatening dollar holdings.

Months ago I would have sworn the IMF was part of the NWO/ CFR/ banking elite but potentially this power struggle was a recent development.

I found nothing about a "world currency" but only a week before the scandal, Joseph Stiglitz applauded the IMF under Strauss-Kahn for their apparent "change of heart" from neoliberal to progressive policies. Could be that some people had fear that their imperialist tool would get out of hand. But he planned to candidate for French Presidentship in 2012 anyway and had good chances, so maybe it was a french set-up by Sarkozystas. According to french reports, he planned to announce his run for presidency just last week, so if this really turns out to be a set-up, and the sex consentual, which the french wouldn't give a damn about - maybe he set up himself and will win the presidency in a land-slide next year?

 

[abaddon]

Are you saying that whenever a woman accuses a man of rape, that the authorities shouldn't take the accusation seriously and investigate the allegations?

Absolutely, they should investigate. However, in this case, the investigation seems to have a serious lack, else why is the prosecution furiously back-pedalling?

He was not "thrown in jail"; he was arrested as anyone charged with a crime is, after his arraignment he was allowed to post bail and was placed on "home" detention.

Would never have happened had the initial investigators done their job. It took attorneys to identify the anomalies in the claims. Why?

He chose to resign.

And this is surprising how, exactly?

How is factual reporting of his arrest and the charges against him slander (actually libel)?

It isn't, but the media chose the sensational route.

No court has made any such determination. Prosecutors have merely agreed to reduce DSK's bail and ease his (local) movement restrictions because information calling into question the woman's credibility has come to light.

Does this not give you pause for thought?

Again, are you saying that the authorities should never take any allegations of a crime seriously?

Once again, no. But the ensuing investigation should not really be rejected by the prosecution team, now should it?

So because an accuser is obscure, her claims shouldn't be taken seriously?

Obscurity has nothing to do with it, the cops failed at their job. A fact which was only later turned up by the PROSECUTION team. That alone toasts Putin's notion of a conspiracy.

 

[little grey rabbit]

Well, let the record show that the forum's leading anti-semite was the first to loudly and clearly say DSK was most likely not a rapist.

The probable outcome as it appears now is that their will be an exact eye for an eye with Paul Wolfowitz. Forced out of the IMF and most likely with a political career ended, but a very pleasant life style (mmmmm...truffles) not otherwise jeopardised. Alls fair and even- and one the life of one migrant woman monstered in the process - but really who gives a damn?

At the moment it is very unsatisfactory. There are a only a small number of psychologically plausible scenarios here.
1.) She was turning tricks for money.
2.) She was a honey-pot for entrapment.
3.) She was raped

I am open to any of these explanations, but just quietly dropping charges because she is "unreliable" is not an acceptable outcome.

She lied on her asylum application? Virtually all the refugees lie on their asylum applications, we have created a system which rewards squeakly wheels, so all refugee wheels squeak as loudly as possible.

She wondered how she could financially benefit from the situation? This is America. Networks were offering 6 figure sums for interviews with Wiener tweetees, why shouldn't a black migrant woman also cash in? You would have to be super-human not to think about the possibilities.

She didn't cower in the hallway but cleaned another room or didn't clean it or whatever? Big deal. If we threw out every rape victims complaint on such minor variations, there would never be a rape conviction.

She receives money from drug dealers? interesting to the extent that there are always intimate links between Illuminati networks and the drug trade - but people who know drug dealers can still be raped.

I hope this still goes to trial and DSK is required to put his version of what happened.