• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Psychics and the election?

Questioninggeller

Illuminator
Joined
May 11, 2002
Messages
3,048
Anyone know of a "Psychic" who has named a winner for the 2004 election? I can only assume most don't have the guts though.
 
I will do it. I don't know if the it will be pulled out of the target pool in time (as its pretty big) but if it is I will post my results here.
 
Joe_Black said:
I will do it. I don't know if the it will be pulled out of the target pool in time (as its pretty big) but if it is I will post my results here.

Target pool....? So your method is to read the minds of all the voters, then? Well, that must of course be time consuming.

I think most psychics on this mission will try to read the future instead. And i guess that about 40-60% of them will claim hits.
 
http://starcats.com/election2004.html
This astrology website seems to be predicting, vaguely at least, the outcome of November's election. Yet, they also predicted that Dean would get the Dem nomination:
http://starcats.com/dean.html
Howard Dean was born with his Sun at 25 Scorpio (November 17, 1948; 7:21 pm*; New York City), which is a very favorable placement in presidential astrology. His very being (the Sun) resonates strongly with the American people by virtue of the exact square to the U.S. Moon. Dean also has his progressed Pallas, the political asteroid at 25 Taurus, a favorable second link to the U.S. Moon. These connections account for his sudden rise in the polls and his successful online fund raising. Based on their links to the U.S. Moon, Dean is the best choice.
Unfortunately, the cold harsh realities of politics kicked in and rather ignored the position of the stars and the "U.S. Moon" - WTF is that?
 
Dean? No, only Howard or Latham can win. The Democrats don't have a chance.
 
From "What's New" by Robert park....

Having flatly rejected the treaty [the Kyoto Protocol], the United States is now isolated
Well, not quite. Australia, under Howard, is with the United States on this.

Howard must lose the election for this to change.
 

Back
Top Bottom