• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Psychic Noreen Renier wrong on Malaysia flight 370

Sherlock

Muse
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
674
Location
Salem, Oregon
During a Coast to Coast AM interview on February 28, 2015 --- which went into the morning hours of March 1, 2015 --- psychic actress Noreen Renier spoke to host Dave Schrader about flight 370.

Malaysia Airlines flight 370 disappeared March 8, 2014, so Renier’s “super psychic” foresight had been actively building up insight for a full year. And clearly she was closely following news reports over the prior 12 months.

So when asked when the plane would be found in the early hours of March 1, 2015 she agreed with the host it would be during 2015. That answer provided exactly 10 months remaining in 2015, or 10% chance per month. Renier opted to answer in “October or November, October" providing a one-in-five chance of being correct, or a 20% chance at being “dead on accurate”.

It’s important to note she didn’t include December 2015 --- which would have raised her chances to 30% --- but instead pushed October as the most likely indicating “..Yes, Yes, I feel like in October." So if at the end of December 2015 the plane has not been found she essentially failed on 10 out 10 months --- scoring a flat zero --- though many would say she’s already made that target.

Not surprisingly she failed to vision the discovery on July 29 2015 of the plane’s right wing flaperon being found on an island in the western Indian Ocean --- about 2,500 miles west of the area where the plane's presumed to have hit the water. Indeed the flaperon section was determined to have been floating for months before reaching shoreline. Yet Renier on March 1, 2015 visioned the initial discovery differently. She stated "So I feel like when you find the plane -- when they find the plane –it’s not going to be all broken up and sprayed. . . it’s going to be like it was parked. . .or like down the runway."

Well it certainly took a massive structural “break-up” for the flaperon assembly to become disconnected from the plane. Such a structural failure would not provide for finding the plane in a 'parked-like' condition.

And when asked by the Coast to Coast AM host if it was going to be found under water or on the ground Renier states "under water but under earth.. . we went under the land again.. . we weren't that far from land." Well incredibly with normal odds the flaperon at least was found neither under water nor under earth! It floated. And it was found on land not far from water --- not the other way around. Ooops!

So far Noreen Renier’s foresight about flight 370 has been wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong. And at the end of December 2015 her score will be another remarkable 100% failure to hit anything right. This marks her fourth in a series of airplane crashes where she’s remarkably scored less than chance in her guesswork and delusionary visions.

And still she persists in her continued decades of embellished storytelling of the “incredible accuracy” of her psychic foresight.

For a full account of her delusionary history visit (and please add this link to your own sites) http://www.globalnetresearch.com/findings.html
 
Last edited:
She is probably aware that she is a fake, so it is surprising that she joins the bandwagon of those that claim the plane was kidnapped - or at any rate, claiming that the plane has landed somewhere must obviously be the least likely possibility.

On the other hand, she might just say what she knows her customers want to hear.
 
Oh she knows that she's a fake it's just that there are some who have to believe in any crazy claim
 
Noreen Renier 2015 Psychic claims on the missing and lost

As she has been told for decades of her errors and continues to repeat them as factual she absolutely lies and pushes known deceptions. Her tales are often delusional as well --- far beyond any reality --- such as her communication with trees as a source of information about past events in the area. Others, including law enforcement officials and judges agree with the assessment she is not credible or correct in her claims.

For more view http://www.globalnetresearch.com/statements.html
 
During a Coast to Coast AM interview on February 28, 2015 --- which went into the morning hours of March 1, 2015 --- psychic actress Noreen Renier spoke to host Dave Schrader about flight 370.

It starts at midnight EST so is always the wee morning hours :)

The host usually sounds pretty bored, and lets the guests yammer on uninterrupted to fill the time. Sometimes I listen to it as white noise while I fall asleep.
 
I haven't listened to C2C for years, but I always envisioned George Noory playing Call of Duty while he let some of these goofballs ramble on and on. At least Art Bell feigned interest in most of the guests.
 
Keep collecting and broadcasting new instances to demonstrate there has not been one scientifically-verifiable instance that anyone, not just Renier, has solved a crime using "psychic" ability. If the day comes that there is provable "psychic" ability, I look forward to the good it would bring to humanity.

I get the sense that Renier has such a long history of being so entrenched in her ways that she will never stop and will push back even harder when cornered with the facts. She will never stop.
 
There was one psychic who 'saw' a murder and was very accurate with her claims..
Then it was discovered that she was the murderer..
Shock.
Horror.
news at 11
 
Noreen Renier psychic detective repeatedly wrong on forecasts

As Noreen Renier has previously responded here (under "NJR" for Noreen Jean Renier) this time she apparently she has no rebuttal worth anything. Her responses in any case are always vague and provide no specifics.

Or are simply innuendo or spite with a statement pointing to some upcoming events before her supporters --- like another talk about one of her books at a local public library. Her supporters have declined rapidly to very few indeed ---based on her own statements that her private hirings have been in serious decline and global investigations have showed no public law enforcement agencies in the U.S. have hired her directly for case investigations for at least two decades, if not three.

She is not, nor has been ever a "police psychic" working cases that she solved. Or was directly hired by the U.S. law enforcement agency to solve.
Not a one in decades.

The word is out on psychic police detectives and mediums with law enforcement agencies --- and the word is apparently 'we don't go there because the results aren't worth crap.'
 
Psychic Actress Noreen Renier: 10 day countdown to zero right

So if at the end of December 2015 the plane has not been found she essentially failed on 10 out of 10 months --- scoring a flat zero --- though many would say she’s already made that target. . . . So far Noreen Renier’s foresight about flight 370 has been wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong. And at the end of December 2015 her score will be another remarkable 100% failure to hit anything right.

The 10-day countdown now begins to zero accuracy in foresight.
 
Last edited:
5 day countdown to zero accuracy by Noreen Renier on Malaysia 370 flight

10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5... and not a peep from Noreen Renier that the close of 2015 marks a year in which her visions on Malaysia 370 proved 100% wrong. It also ends another full decade showcasing her 100% failure to make accurate paranormal foresight visions.
 
Last edited:
10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5... and not a peep from Noreen Renier that the close of 2015 marks a year in which her visions on Malaysia 370 proved 100% wrong. It also ends another full decade showcasing her 100% failure to make accurate paranormal foresight visions.
Clearly the thread title is three words and a number too long.
 
In another four days I'd say it will be appropriate to ALWAYS drop the word psychic --- thus the thread will be four words too long. Or as I've done in the past, we should only use psychic alongside Noreen Renier when it's followed by actress. And now perhaps also preceded by delusional. Delusional psychic actress.
 
Last edited:
And when asked by the Coast to Coast AM host if it was going to be found under water or on the ground Renier states "under water but under earth.. . we went under the land again.. . we weren't that far from land."


So, near water then? I still need to fill my bingo card.
 
Psychic actress Noreen Renier: A delusional tale of nonsense.

So, near water then? I still need to fill my bingo card.

Hhhhhmmmmm. Let's review. She stated: "So I feel like when you find the plane -- when they find the plane –it’s not going to be all broken up and sprayed. . . it’s going to be like it was parked. . .or like down the runway."

It's a reasonable assumption that this plane hit water (a river or ocean) with enough force to disconnect the structure from the plane’s right wing flaperon assembly. It would therefore:

1. Already be "broken up" which Noreen Renier indicates didn't happen.
2. Already be "sprayed" whether that means sprayed with water or scattered in pieces. Which she also stated didn't happen.
3. Already not be "parked" nor "like down a runway." It's fuselage (or key structural pieces) would be water logged and depending on currents and underwater 'ground' conditions, might not be stationary.
4. It would not be as described as "under water but under earth.. . we went under the land again.. . we weren't that far from land." It's nonsense to describe the pieces of the planes structure under such an impact as "under water but under earth" (mud, ground, soil) as it would be below principally water (such as sitting in deep ocean sentiment with water overhead), or resting principally upon the ocean floor --- either way its still below water. And since it's no longer in the air at 500'-5000' altitude its no longer "not far from land" nor both (such as parked and under rain). And at this point it's principal structures like the fuselage would not be afloat.
5. "Not far from land." What's does that mean? Along a sandy shoreline? Sitting 1000 meters off shoreland below a muddy shelf? It's far more likely it's 1-3 thousand miles off Australia in deep water rather than sitting along the shore of a lovely little island. But perhaps its also under the shade of some big palm trees in Noreen Renier's apparent highly delusional tale and "super psychic" paranormal visions.

I'd say you've already scored BINGO just by ignoring her altogether. For a collection of global comments (including from law enforcement officials and judges) that peg Noreen Renier as not credible, see: http://globalnetresearch.com/statements.html
 
Last edited:
Why Maureen Reiner, Sherlock?

Considering the fact that all psychics are frauds, you had many to choose from. :)
 
Check out our history here on the forum by searching under Noreen Renier. In the past decade I've won 5 federal court rulings against her in 5 different court rooms, before 6 different judges. She has been deemed not credible by one federal court with two later federal appeals courts agreeing with that same lower federal court's rulings against her in my favor. And if there's any doubts why Noreen Renier doesn't rate at the extreme end of delusional tales presented as fact, examine the findings at: http://globalnetresearch.com/findings.html
 

Back
Top Bottom