• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Pope Benedict Needs History Lessons

merphie

Graduate Poster
Joined
Sep 11, 2004
Messages
1,890
I just read an article in Newsweek August 15, 2005 on the pope's first address as pope.

He claimed the Nazis were athiest and it was the lack of religion that caused the entire movement.

Is he ignorant or is he lying?
 
merphie said:
I just read an article in Newsweek August 15, 2005 on the pope's first address as pope.

He claimed the Nazis were athiest and it was the lack of religion that caused the entire movement.

Is he ignorant or is he lying?

Considering how Hitler kept saying he was sent by God, how he constantly attacked communism and Juddaism for being atheistic (go figure), and his belief in the supernatural, I think the Pope is pulling the old unprovable "secret athiesm" garbage Jedi Knight had years ago. Afer all, Hitler was raised Catholic, and he valued the Aryan Christian legacy of Germany. Benedict probably just thought the Nazis were atheist because they kicked him out of Hitler Youth over religious differences. This is a case of conviction over fact, and I'll bet he cites Table Talks to back him up, but no other source.
 
Let's not rule out two other possibilities: that Newsweek is wrong, or that merphie is.

As it turns out, merphie is wrong. The article in question can be found here.

First of all, the article does not deal with Ratzinger's first address as pope, although it does examine an address he made as a cardinal shortly before the death of Pope John Paul II. This is a minor mistake, however.

More important, what the article actually says is this:
As the journal of theology Concilium wrote last year, the roots of Christian culture in Europe are tangled around some very ugly history, including centuries of religious wars and, more recently, the Holocaust: "Even though full-blown Nazism was an atheistic and anti-Christian ideology, the fact remains that European nations, East and West, colluded in the destruction of their Jewish citizenry." Given such history, it's not altogether surprising that, as Concilium put it, "Christianity is for most Europeans a part of Europe's distant past and not much more."
Merphie mistakenly put these words in Benedict's mouth. The 2004 Concilium article quoted by Newsweek can be found here. It was not authored by Ratzinger as either cardinal or pope, but by Cambridge professor Janet Soskice and noted Italian historian Alberto Melloni.

It would be somewhat interesting to explore the claim "Full-blown Nazism was an atheistic and anti-Christian ideology" - it's certainly not an outlandish one - but we can safely leave the pope out of it for now.
 
ceo_esq said:
Let's not rule out two other possibilities: that Newsweek is wrong, or that merphie is.

As it turns out, merphie is wrong. The article in question can be found here.

First of all, the article does not deal with Ratzinger's first address as pope, although it does examine an address he made as a cardinal shortly before the death of Pope John Paul II. This is a minor mistake, however.

More important, what the article actually says is this:Merphie mistakenly put these words in Benedict's mouth. The 2004 Concilium article quoted by Newsweek can be found here. It was not authored by Ratzinger as either cardinal or pope, but by Cambridge professor Janet Soskice and noted Italian historian Alberto Melloni.

It would be somewhat interesting to explore the claim "Full-blown Nazism was an atheistic and anti-Christian ideology" - it's certainly not an outlandish one - but we can safely leave the pope out of it for now.

Oops. I reread it. Maybe the article was poorly written. Maybe I was in a hurry. To me it sounds like they are quoting benedict when he was doing another profession.

My mistake. I freely admit it.
 
We all make these kinds of mistakes, but it still irks me how so many people still try to connect Nazism and atheism, aarggh.

On a slightly related note, has anyone else noticed how Newsweek and USNews magazines seem to have a major cover story dealing with religion just about every month? Christianity in America, The rise of Religion, Finding the Real Jesus, The Battle over Evolution, etc... these seem to be hot topics for the writers of those magazines these days. Then again, this country does have an increasing problem with Fundamentalists trying to gain power, so I guess it's no surprise.
 
Moon-Spinner said:
We all make these kinds of mistakes, but it still irks me how so many people still try to connect Nazism and atheism, aarggh.

On a slightly related note, has anyone else noticed how Newsweek and USNews magazines seem to have a major cover story dealing with religion just about every month? Christianity in America, The rise of Religion, Finding the Real Jesus, The Battle over Evolution, etc... these seem to be hot topics for the writers of those magazines these days. Then again, this country does have an increasing problem with Fundamentalists trying to gain power, so I guess it's no surprise.

Even our local news channels are doing it. They started a new segment called "Religion Report".
 
merphie said:
Even our local news channels are doing it. They started a new segment called "Religion Report".


Start demanding a segment on science and scientific discovery to balance that.
 
fowlsound said:
Start demanding a segment on science and scientific discovery to balance that.

Unless you put "god bless" in the commincation they don't seem to respond.
 
merphie said:
Even our local news channels are doing it. They started a new segment called "Religion Report".

Time to bring out the God-machine! ;)
 
merphie said:
Unless you put "god bless" in the commincation they don't seem to respond.

I don't see any problem with "God Bless this Scientific Discovery..."


heh.


Yeah ok, now I see it.
 
fowlsound said:
Start demanding a segment on science and scientific discovery to balance that.
Why would science and scientific discovery function as a counterbalance to religion? They are not diametrically opposed.

For that matter, how would news reporting about religious issues function as a counterbalance to news reporting about science issues?
 
ceo_esq said:
Why would science and scientific discovery function as a counterbalance to religion? They are not diametrically opposed.

For that matter, how would news reporting about religious issues function as a counterbalance to news reporting about science issues?


Hmm. good point.

Change of plan.

As station how religion reporting is balanced at all?
 
How about a study in critical thinking? That's certainly diametrically opposed to religion, which is based on dogma and unquestioning belief in the unprovable...
 
ceo_esq said:
Why would science and scientific discovery function as a counterbalance to religion? They are not diametrically opposed.

This is true. Why don't they have a muslim section of the report? Buddist?

Is this because we are a christian nation?
 
At least you're not in Utah where half the channels are Mormon and the other half are on California time so you have to stay up until 1 to watch all the good shows.
 

Back
Top Bottom