p'doh rehashing codenamegrillfire nuttiness

[HeyLeroy]

Over on the SLC forum, p'dope is rehashing the codenamegrillfire guy, Timothy McNiven:

Our own U.S. Army devised a plan commissioned by Congress to bring down the WTC using commercial airliners and box cutters as weapons.

The publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers. However, McNiven claims the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off the perfect terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario.

The study, commissioned to C-Battery 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army, stationed in Strassburg, Germany in 1976, specifically devised the scenario of the Twin Towers being leveled by Middle Eastern terrorists using commercial airliners and even plastic box cutters to bypass security.

The head of the 1976 mock terrorist plan was Lt. Michael Teague of Long Island, who McNiven says was given specific orders by higher-ups in the military to use the Twin Towers as the terrorist target.

McNiven said he has been unable to contact Lt. Teague, but was interested in his opinion now that "the 9/11 attacks happened the way we planned them in 1976."

"I remember Lt. Teague changed the scenario of the supposed study from a 100 story building to the Twin Towers," recalled McNiven, emphasizing that Lt. Teague was acting on specific orders from unknown superiors.

"He then said he thought it was very strange to be asked to devise a plan to blow up your own home town. But as I watched the Twin Towers really collapse on the morning of September 11th, I realized I was watching the very same thing we devised in the 1976."

http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=1545

If 9/11 mirrors his supposed plan from 1976 "exactly", doesn't this back the "no explosives" position?

 

[Firestone]

Well, no, Timothy McNiven said that is was "exactly like what occurred"!

Thats is not the same if he said "exactly what occured" is it?

(Sorry, that post was irresistible. )

 

[HeyLeroy]

Got me laughing! Cheers.

ETA: Your question is a mooted point?

ETA2: Everyone wave to p'doh! He's checking out the thread.

 

[Firestone]

On a serious note, I've been aware of this story for, say two years. And then it was already around for some time.

What strikes me with most of these stories is that they don't evolve. We get a claim, and that's it. No further investigation, no corroboration from other people, although in most of these stories the claim is that others are involved.
But CT's don't mind repeating them endlessly.

That's the difference between CT's and real investigative journalists.

 

[Calcas]

On a serious note, I've been aware of this story for, say two years. And then it was already around for some time.

What strikes me with most of these stories is that they don't evolve. We get a claim, and that's it. No further investigation, no corroboration from other people, although in most of these stories the claim is that others are involved.
But CT's don't mind repeating them endlessly.

That's the difference between CT's and real investigative journalists.

"no corroboration from other people..."

That's the key. One lone nut has zero credibility. That is, unless P'Duh dregs it up again a few years later.

And P'Duh's intelligence can be verified by my siggy...

 

[Arus808]

You mean like Arus808, who has just done a hit and run post, ehich I proved to be a lie in my very next post?

Yes your making things so difficult lol

I am a member there

Bolding mine.

So who is pdoh's sock here?

 

[Calcas]

Bolding mine.

So who is pdoh's sock here?

I don't think he has a current sock here. He's been permanantely banned for having numerous socks before this and his posting style is such it doesn't take long to figure out who he is.

 

[Arus808]

maybe he's a "member" and hasn't posted yet.