Paso a Paso The 9-11 truth surfaces (Pentagon edition)

Fonebone

persona non grata
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
2,503
Location
NorthWest New Jersey USA
Paso a Paso 9-11 truth surfaces (Pentagon edition)
Redacted interview:

Press the "watch video on Youtube" link.

if link above returns ERROR message, remove front and rear dashes in the link below, then copy and paste link into browser

--https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RgRjZ2fXx0--

One expert witness's' testimony that shares his first-hand experiences and events at the 9-11 crime scenes,
that states openly his name, and lists his professional expert bona fides as a Pentagon first responder, are
more credible than a dozen anonymous internet cucurbitas that co-exist in our digital garden.
 
unavailable_video.png

This video isn't available any more
 
The 3rd ID didn't send units to the Pentagon on 9-11. This guy is lying.
The "3rd Infantry" means the 3rd Infantry Regiment, the unit that, among other duties, performs ceremonial functions at Arlington National Cemetery, including, of course, guarding the Tomb of the Unknowns. And they definitely did send soldiers to help at the Pentagon.
 
The "3rd Infantry" means the 3rd Infantry Regiment, the unit that, among other duties, performs ceremonial functions at Arlington National Cemetery, including, of course, guarding the Tomb of the Unknowns. And they definitely did send soldiers to help at the Pentagon.
Figures. You'd think he'd be specific about his unit other than "Alpha Company".
 
About 2:00 ". . . members of the cabal . . ." :rolleyes:

About 4:30 Eisenberg finds it extremely suspicious that he was put on guard duty but issued blank ammunition. Did it occur to him that, as a ceremonial unit, they probably didn't have much live ammunition lying around?

About 7:30 Several minutes of the usual BS about no plane parts. :rolleyes:

About 13:00 Claims to be an expert on P&W engine parts because he worked at at P&W parts facility and claims he and his comrades never pulled any engine parts out of the building "and we pulled everything out." BS. We have several pictures of engine parts in the rubble.

About 14:30 ". . . couldn't land a Cessna . . . nice leisurely flight around Washington . . . heavily defended building . . ." :rolleyes:

I've seen enough, although I'll have another question later. Tell us, Fonebone, why should we take this tinfoil hatter seriously when all he's doing is rehashing long-debunked Truther BS?
 
About 13:00 Claims to be an expert on P&W engine parts because he worked at at P&W parts facility and claims he and his comrades never pulled any engine parts out of the building "and we pulled everything out." BS. We have several pictures of engine parts in the rubble.
And IIRC they were clearly identified as RR RB211 parts, because flight 77 was fitted with RB211s not P&Ws.

Dave
 
Fonebone, why are we still here in 2025 going over what has already been explained thoroughly for 2 decades?


Photos of airliner debris, from engines, landing gears, wheels, fuselage portions with recognisable American Airlines paint, etc.
Video of an airliner hitting the Pentagon.
Data from the black box, found inside the Pentagon.
Data from RADAR and audio air traffic controllers and pilots.
Nearly 200 witnesses, just on record, let alone the hundreds more who likely saw it too.

There is no debate when it comes to no-planers. In the day and age of AI, where you can literally ask and it will provide you an entire internet worth of resources, for anyone to think any of the flights on 9/11 didn't crash, is total wilful ignorance.
 
Fonebone, why are we still here in 2025 going over what has already been explained thoroughly for 2 decades?


Photos of airliner debris, from engines, landing gears, wheels, fuselage portions with recognisable American Airlines paint, etc.
Video of an airliner hitting the Pentagon.
Data from the black box, found inside the Pentagon.
Data from RADAR and audio air traffic controllers and pilots.
Nearly 200 witnesses, just on record, let alone the hundreds more who likely saw it too.

There is no debate when it comes to no-planers. In the day and age of AI, where you can literally ask and it will provide you an entire internet worth of resources, for anyone to think any of the flights on 9/11 didn't crash, is total wilful ignorance.
Good points, but with the uptick in social media posts by some MAGA supporters, expect to hear more of this.
 
About 14:30 ". . . couldn't land a Cessna . . . nice leisurely flight around Washington . . . heavily defended building . . ." :rolleyes:
Still waiting for a Truther to a) provide evidence the Pentagon had air defenses, and b) explain why those air defenses would be calibrated to stop a plane ramming, when the Pentagon's in the flight path of an airport.

If anything, being planned for that unlikely scenario would be MORE suspicious.
 
It's been a few years, so... let's review the truth that continues to "surface:"

One bright day, in the middle of the night,
Trustworthy traitors with explosive thermite
Put bombs in the basement for top-down collapse,
Then told thousands of Jews, "keep this plan under wraps."
They publicly flaunted their secretive ways
With a twelve-hour power-down that lasted two days.
Then innocent terrorists hijacked planes (four times),
Showing us how the U.S. is guilty of war crimes.
Then bomb-laden holograms flew in their place
(By the FBI, to throw themselves off the case)
Toward four helpless targets that planes couldn't harm.
NORAD defenders stood down in alarm
Then shot down one plane and to Cleveland flew it
To fool all the networks, who already knew it.
The fire chief said "pull it" and pushed towers down
Into their own footprints, for blocks all around.
These pre-taped events were all shown on TV live
(Just like when O'Brien told Winston to see five!)
As part of an idiot's ingenious plan
To fight the Iraqis in Afghanistan.
But because I know nothing, they couldn't deceive me.
I only tell lies to prove you should believe me.
 

Back
Top Bottom