• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Osama On FBI's 10 Most Wanted

Toro

Student
Joined
Sep 17, 2006
Messages
48
I didn't see this addressed in a thread anywhere, so if this is redundant, then I apologize.

One argument made by the CTs is that the FBI doesn't list 9/11 as a reason for being on the Ten Most Wanted List

Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm

Why?
 
Doesn't the FBI most-wanted thing prove there was NO conspiracy?

Why, yes it does.

If 9/11 had been an inside job, Osama would be number one on the FBI list, and 9/11 would be prominently listed as the cause, the better to make the subterfuge work.

The conspirators would never allow the FBI to undercut the official story. Conspiracy people have Cream of Wheat for brains.
 
Last edited:
Here is an article that directly addresses this issue:

Bin Laden, Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings? - Washington Post (August 28, 2006)

This U.K. document discusses evidence and 9/11:

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States, 11 September 2001 - U.K. government, 10 Downing Street

The U.K. document comes with a caveat:

This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin Laden in a court of law. Intelligence often cannot be used evidentially, due both to the strict rules of admissibility and to the need to protect the safety of sources. But on the basis of all the information available HMG is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this document.
Also, keep in mind that the FBI now maintains a separate list of "most wanted terrorists". This is prefaced with the following:

The alleged terrorists on this list have been indicted by sitting Federal Grand Juries in various jurisdictions in the United States for the crimes reflected on their wanted posters. Evidence was gathered and presented to the Grand Juries, which led to their being charged. The indictments currently listed on the posters allow them to be arrested and brought to justice. Future indictments may be handed down as various investigations proceed in connection to other terrorist incidents, for example, the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.
 
"osama fbi list" (No quotes in search string) returns 132 hits

TAM
 
Doesn't the FBI most-wanted thing prove there was NO conspiracy?

Why, yes it does.

If 9/11 had been an inside job, Osama would be number one on the FBI list, and 9/11 would be prominently listed as the cause, the better to make the subterfuge work.

The conspirators would never allow the FBI to undercut the official story. Conspiracy people have Cream of Wheat for brains.
I've thought the same thing since I first saw the FBI point made. How dumb are the conspirators? They let it slip in interviews, they allow the firemen who are in on it to bleat "the building is going to blow up!" at passersby, they accuse bin Laden and don't even mention 9/11 in his Most Wanted entry. In the CTs' world, everyone is the Three Stooges.
 
From the previously posted Washington Post story
David N. Kelley, the former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to Sept. 11 on the official wanted poster. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant.
"It might seem a little strange from the outside, but it makes sense from a legal point of view," said Kelley, now in private practice. "If I were in government, I'd be troubled if I were asked to put up a wanted picture where no formal charges had been filed, no matter who it was."
 
Osama was already indicted for his role in the us embassies bombings in kenya and tazmania within 3 months of the attacks. What evidence did they have to indict him at the time?
 
In the CTs' world, everyone is the Three Stooges.

And yet, somehow, capable of pulling off a scheme of this magnitude.

Like the Moon landing deniers who say there aren't any stars in pictures taken on the moon - someone in a NASA fakery studio is still slapping his forehead for that little oversight. ;)
 
"osama fbi list" (No quotes in search string) returns 132 hits

TAM

Thanks.

I typed in "fbi" (no quotes) again and came up with nothing - again. I figured less words the better. :boggled:

Apparently not.

But your search definitely helps.
 
Thanks.

I typed in "fbi" (no quotes) again and came up with nothing - again. I figured less words the better. :boggled:

Apparently not.

But your search definitely helps.

I suggest using google or other search engine, rather than the internal forum search feature. 'Osama' + 'FBI', restricted to searching "forums.randi.org" turns up some useful results.

If you still can't find what you are looking for, I don't mind trying to answer questions again.

-Kate
 
I suggest using google or other search engine, rather than the internal forum search feature. 'Osama' + 'FBI', restricted to searching "forums.randi.org" turns up some useful results.

If you still can't find what you are looking for, I don't mind trying to answer questions again.

-Kate

Use the 'advanced search' option off of the forum's search menu. It'll take you to the domain specific Google search for the forums.
 
Osama was already indicted for his role in the us embassies bombings in kenya and tazmania within 3 months of the attacks. What evidence did they have to indict him at the time?

Psssst - Geggy, that's what a Grand Jury does. It listens to EVIDENCE, and decides to indict. The FBI does not decide to put them on the list out of thin air. More than I can say about CT'ers.
 
Osama was already indicted for his role in the us embassies bombings in kenya and tazmania within 3 months of the attacks. What evidence did they have to indict him at the time?


They had someone from the CIA involved in the bombings. A double agent if you will.

Except, at the same time he was also an FBI informant, and, infact, a dedicated and active member of Al Qaeda.

So I guess he was a triple agent...

-Gumboot
 

Back
Top Bottom