Oh Fetzer, your credibility goes (further) down the drain

chipmunk stew said:
Can't watch the video just now, but is that a reference to the Wood/Reynolds Beam Weapon?
Click to expand...

Yep. But now they seem to claim it also brought down WTC7 via "hypervibrations in the steel".

So, now we not only need a BWoD that can overcome all of the issues R.Mackey brought up, we also need one that can produce two very different damage profiles. Or we need two separate beam weapon systems, one that "disintegrates" concrete and steel, and one that induces "hypervibrations" in steel, both of which overcome the aforementioned difficulties.

How many layers of impossibility are there now? I think I've lost count. Time to take off my shoes....
 
Last edited:
“Judy Wood has speculated that source of energy may have been a new generation of high Tec weapon…and during this discussion I had on this radio program with her last night she offered the speculation, considered, admittedly as speculation that this might have been a weapon that was located on a satellite, that it could be a satellite military weapon.

”We all I’m sure aware about the militarization of space …………….”

Bla bla bla and finally onto WTC 7

“And here you have got this enormous electrical generator in building 7. When Judy brought her hypothesis about one of these high tech weapons to (inaudible) what kind of hyper high vibrations in the steel, you know this causes it to self destruct. She said “can you imagine where?”

“I said “Building 7?" And she said "Nooooo“"

“Then she went to offer her hypothesis depending on the optics and all that from space. Some enormous amount of energy was required to bring about the destruction you have seen. I mean don’t doubt it, look at this, look at this, look at this”

“Anyone who can look at this and say the Governments account is correct has something not quite right”

:jaw-dropp :jaw-dropp WOW :jaw-dropp :jaw-dropp
 
If anymore proof were needed that CT'ers (like Fetzer) will believe anything that even remotely supports their assertion, no matter how bizarre or tin-foil covered it is, this is it.
 
Last edited:
Errr... wouldn't have been a lot cheaper, feasible and spectacular, say, to have crashed a couple of airliners into, for example, some nearby taller buildings, so that they fell onto it? :boggled:

Sorry, that's just plain ludicrous, isn't it?

What is all the big deal about demolishing WTC 7? It seems as if the master planners at the CIA didn't think knocking down the two main towers was enough of a shock. They needed something special for a much smaller and less noticed building.
 
Another self-defeating CT. If the US had this kind of weapon, why would they want to stage 9/11 to get an excuse for invading Afganistan (or whatever)? They would already have the world by the tail in a downhill pull.

Hans
 
Oh Fetzer, your credibility goes (further) down the drain

Could you possibly point out when Fetzer had any credibility (I/Enquireing Mynds want too no.)
 
I love the claim that if the "Bathtub" had been seriously damaged, all of lower Manhattan would have been flooded. Apparently Uncle Fetzer believes that lower Manhattan is the Zuyder Zee.
 
Here is what is so strange:

Woods and Reynolds leave the "Scholars" over trouble with S. Jones. they write two nasty papers on him, calling him a fraud.

Initially Fetzer remains loyal to S. Jones.

Now Fetzer is embracing Woods work, calling her the "Most qualified person in the truth movement to talk on areas of 9/11 research", which IMO is a slap in the face to Jones. Woods "Theory" says laser beams brought down the WTCs, so that also flys directly in the face of S.Jones "Thermite" research. Fetzer now seems to favor Woods research.

Will we see S. Jones kicked out or abandoned by the scholars, and Woods and Reynolds readmitted.

More interesting than a soap opera.

TAM
 
fuelair said:
Oh Fetzer, your credibility goes (further) down the drain

Could you possibly point out when Fetzer had any credibility (I/Enquireing Mynds want too no.)
Click to expand...

I didn't want to put 'down the drain' because people would've been all "he had no credibility anyway"
 
fuelair said:
Oh Fetzer, your credibility goes (further) down the drain

Could you possibly point out when Fetzer had any credibility (I/Enquireing Mynds want too no.)
Click to expand...

JAStewart said:
I didn't want to put 'down the drain' because people would've been all "he had no credibility anyway"
Click to expand...

Actually, this is something we should address. These "scholars" must have had some bit of credibility or ability at some point, to let them graduate with a degree, and actually get some sort of job in their field. What we need to show is that this past record doesn't neccessarily mean they're sane now.

People do change over time, and we all know that some changes can be negative. I've seen at least one completely insane patent application from a fellow who a few years before was doing real, worthwhile work. I don't know what happened, but clearly at some point he just lost it. I think a lot of people don't want to admit that such things can happen.
 
Horatius said:
Actually, this is something we should address. These "scholars" must have had some bit of credibility or ability at some point, to let them graduate with a degree, and actually get some sort of job in their field. What we need to show is that this past record doesn't neccessarily mean they're sane now.

People do change over time, and we all know that some changes can be negative. I've seen at least one completely insane patent application from a fellow who a few years before was doing real, worthwhile work. I don't know what happened, but clearly at some point he just lost it. I think a lot of people don't want to admit that such things can happen.
Click to expand...


Most of them don't have jobs. Fetzer, Griffin, Bowman, Jones, Wood, Barrett... all of them are retired or unemployed.
 
You guys don't get it. The Star Wars Beam theory is actually evidence of the government's 9/11 conspiracy. The idea is so ridiculous that only government disinformation agents would promote it. These agents are pretenting to be part of the 9/11 denial movement so they can discredit it from the inside. Why did the government invent the Star Wars Beam theory if they didn't have something to hide? I'm just asking questions here!
 
JamesB said:
Most of them don't have jobs. Fetzer, Griffin, Bowman, Jones, Wood, Barrett... all of them are retired or unemployed.
Click to expand...


Yes, but to be retired, you have to have had a job at some point, right? Jones was a professor, so was Wood. I'm not sure about the others, but they had to have done something in life....What changed between then and now? Are they just senile, or were they always like this, and just hid it better, or had better things to do at the time? Did 9/11 cause some sort of psychotic break?
 
Horatius said:
Yes, but to be retired, you have to have had a job at some point, right? Jones was a professor, so was Wood. I'm not sure about the others, but they had to have done something in life....What changed between then and now? Are they just senile, or were they always like this, and just hid it better, or had better things to do at the time? Did 9/11 cause some sort of psychotic break?
Click to expand...



Didn't one of them work for an oil company at some point?

-Gumboot
 
Horatius said:
Yes, but to be retired, you have to have had a job at some point, right? Jones was a professor, so was Wood. I'm not sure about the others, but they had to have done something in life....What changed between then and now? Are they just senile, or were they always like this, and just hid it better, or had better things to do at the time? Did 9/11 cause some sort of psychotic break?
Click to expand...

Either that, being bored with life or some personal issues/dramas/events to which they refuse to confront or they are the center of blame.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom