My opinion is not uninformed there are just many things I have no clue about. The issues at hand are about what we do know.
I think Jone's work is important, I just do not see it as necessary to knowing that explosives were used on these buildings. The event itself is what screams explosives. Consider the case of WTC7, and then realize that even a single intact vertical column would have caused an asymmetrical collapse.
Jones' work is vital, seeing as how NIST cannot follow regulations and test for explosives. (something that would have shut up all of this)
How could a massive building that occupied an entire city block fall so quickly and symmetrically into a tidy rubble pile with large sections of the facade laying neatly (intact sections) on the pile without internal explosives? http://wtc7.net/rubblepile.html
Unfortunately, fire and gravity (and damage to the southeast) do not come close to being able to account for it/ We should look at the evidence and work from there with hypothesis that fit observed events.
The collapse of WTC is memorable for its 'text book' symmetricality, its near seamless fall into its own footprint hours after the larger building had already collapsed.
RVlover said:Conspiracy Theorist Convinces Neil Armstrong Moon Landing Was Faked | The Onion - America's Finest News Source
This doesnt surprise me of our Government ; does it you ?
You can obtain alot of compelling information posted by Professionals on virtually any subject ... Scientists included , on YouTube despite the typical Youth garbage that is prevalent . In addition, I have studied a very professionally done DVD on loan from a friend on the major reasons why it was in fact a big hoax . Until you have thoroughly investigated both sides of the debate without an apriori-philosophical bias , you should refrain from speaking in absolutes ; I can tell by your demeanor that you automatically disqualify a competing view ... and resign to 'of course we went to the Moon...I watched it on TV when i was younger ; and our Government wouldnt do anything so heinous as to fool the World' . If you are willing to proceed with a deep investigation of this issue, please do so then post your findings at which time we can have a proper dialogue instead of one based on personal attacks and hostility. Thank you. End.
Based on interactions with "debunkers" online, the most consistent characteristic I have encountered is also Narcissism, with the propensity to use a type of condescension that only comes with the warmth and security of being part of the herd. Of course, I am smarter than most everyone, at least based on intelligence quotient, and I take pride in my ability to brush off those who think I am crazy or stupid for what I know.
i wouldnt put this under the conspiracy file but a lot of cool and chilling coincidences that were found in tv shows, movies and even comic books. this youtube clip starts off with part one and ends at part 25
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L1k8AxGe4g
Nominating Tippit for fighting the good fight against narcissism:
That is some prime Stundipity.![]()
I take pride in my ability to brush off those who think I am crazy or stupid for what I know.
That was my thought too... If I remember the OS correctly all the steel was transported out in record time for recycling by Chinese Steel corporations.
Wait I thought it was official story that wtc7 was a controlled demolition? I was under the impression that the nyc or port authority officials had requested that wtc7 be brought down in a controlled manner since they were afraid there was structural problems and didnt want it to collapse unexpectedly and in an unsafe manner.
Let me address some of the silly criticisms above. Here are 20 facts about Britain and its government. They might surprise you, although last time I checked the political system in the USA it's just as corrupted. Where's the 'conspiracy' in the following facts -
1. The 'head of state' in England is unelected. Right ? It's the monarchy.
Really ?
In that case you will confirm to us that the deal made between King John of England with the pope in Rome (during the era of Magna Carta) was binding on him and all future kings of England in perpetuity. According to its own text. Sealed by King John. Which meant England and the tax payers of England were forever to pay, each year, big money to the papacy in Rome through all monarchs. There's the truth.
As for the Jesuits, they infiltrated England, big time, and are today running whole areas of our government, our secret services, our mass media, our newspapers, television etc. Haven't heard about it ? Have you heard of the Knights of Columbus and their control of the CIA ? How many directors have been members of that one group ?
Try the website 'Arctic Beacon' ?
Surely you can confirm this to be true. You are a historian. The documented scam of the monarchy and the papacy in alliance in perpetuity. Forever. Says so right in the text ! Assuming of course documentary evidence matters to you, that is. I am also a historian.
Try the website 'Arctic Beacon' ?
My GOD! England is a Monarchy?!!??!?! Why Wasn't I Told?!?!??!?
Does the Queen know?
Seriously, so Hollywood likes to set a lot of films in New York