October Stundie Finals

[Travis]

So, let's first honor the winner from September.

Sound is carried by convection currents
Heat causes rising convection currents called thermals.
Explosions cause heat, which causes thermals, which are rising convection currents.
Sound from explosions will be carried on rising convection currents.
Sound from explosions rise, not fall.
Got that mattfactsof911?
Dumbass! ​

Congratulations!

Well folks. It was especially hard to whittle them down this month. It took me about 3 goes (well four, actually, but one was just because I'm an idiot and lost my file where I had already eliminated some nominations) to get it down to the finalists. It would help me if you all weren't so darned industrious in finding these quotes but then we wouldn't have nearly as much fun.


1) It's always important to stay positive. It shows that you either have great determination or are absolutely, totally batcrap insane.

I look at this from a different point of view then those who support Obama. I feel that every lawsuit that’s dismissed proves further that what Orly says is TRUE.

*****
2) How much you wanna bet that trying to "look this up" will result in hillarity?

How is it that other countries were watching the Apollo missions, when ALL the alleged missions occurred on the far side of the moon?

Why do you think the missions occurred on the far side? I have never seen this claim before from anyone.

You shouldn't really post without knowing what you're talking about, unless you would like to claim you've been mislead all these years.

1. It's a known fact never been up for questioning where the alleged landing sites were; you need to look at a map of those alleged sites, they were ALL claimed to be on the far side of the moon. Look it up.

*****
3) It's nice to see that having "no clue" about "many things" no longer means you are "uninformed."

My opinion is not uninformed there are just many things I have no clue about. The issues at hand are about what we do know.

*****
4) If only self-awareness was included in the "intelligence quotient."

Based on interactions with "debunkers" online, the most consistent characteristic I have encountered is also Narcissism, with the propensity to use a type of condescension that only comes with the warmth and security of being part of the herd. Of course, I am smarter than most everyone, at least based on intelligence quotient, and I take pride in my ability to brush off those who think I am crazy or stupid for what I know.

*****
5) I would like to think that step #1 in debunking the "Official Story" would be to know what that "Official Story" actually is......but what do I know?

That was my thought too... If I remember the OS correctly all the steel was transported out in record time for recycling by Chinese Steel corporations.

Wait I thought it was official story that wtc7 was a controlled demolition? I was under the impression that the nyc or port authority officials had requested that wtc7 be brought down in a controlled manner since they were afraid there was structural problems and didnt want it to collapse unexpectedly and in an unsafe manner.

*****
6) Hasn't everyone heard of transparent carbon nanotubes because...

ps. Extra marks. Exactly how did the lunar rovers - the dune buggies - get transported to the moon? Were they stored in the LEM or what?

...the Lunar rovers were transported there by the invisible space elevator, duh.
*****
7) I sure hope whatever agency it is that investigates criminal things catches on to the plot this other unknown agency is doing.

From what I hear, on what you would probably consider conspiracy mongering radio, all the new people Obama has appointed to head whatever departments of government that oversee how medicine is run, are telling all the new people becoming doctors to not take the oath. The suggestion on these radio shows is that they want to save money by administering death instead of care, if you are not considered a productive part of society, just like the Nazi's.

*****
8) You know Israel is powerful when it can sink ships before it even exists.

The 9/11 and the Titanic have one thing in common. Both incidents were engineered by the Society of Jesus.

The attacks were carried out by the US Military-Industrial Complex, US/Israeli Intelligence, and the US Newsmedia..

*****
9) Supposedly there's water here on Earth but I've looked at pictures of this Atacama Desert that suggest otherwise!

Water found on moon

Unlucky they missed that when they were there

ROFL

*****
10) Insane? Not if you ask physicists from before Galileo.

I'm insane? According to you, if there was a heavy person on one side of the see-saw it would tip toward the heavy person. If the fulcrum is removed and the see-saw is falling through air, you want us to believe it will not continue to rotate until the heaviest load (person) is aligned in the direction (plane) of free-fall motion?

*****
11) With the population hitting 6.795 billion the head of the NWO Depopulation Division has been sacked for failing to meet quotas.

It is easy to throw your hands in the air and to drift aimlessly on ethereal air currents. It is hard, on the other hand, to challenge the very real New World Order that is engaged in depopulation policies on record.

*****
12) I question whether this guy is actually real.

I am being extremely conservative here by calling bull on the lie, top to bottom: Fake reporting. Fake video. Fake victims. Fake airplanes. Fake physics. Fake conspiracy theories. Perhaps even fake companies - how do we find out if they are real? We just trust it's a real company because we are all collectively agreeing to some legal docs in some archive somewhere that we've never seen?

I have nothing to "prove." We have no patriotic duty, no social obligation and no reason to believe what anyone says to us. Ever.

*****
13)
Step 1) Destroy WTC 1&2 to enable destruction of WTC7
Step 2) Destroy WTC 7 because it was where Step #1 was coordinated from
Step 3) Wait, why are we doing this again?

If flt 93 was suppose to double back and hit WTC 7 ... by removing WTC 1 and 2 does that give a clear flight path down to 47 story WTC 7 or is it obscured by buildings...?

*****
14) Good news for those that hate vacuuming: dust is no longer "something."

The towers just didn’t collapse into their own footprint……the disappeared into dust into their own footprint. 110 stories X 2…..disappeared into dust…..with a combined total of only 1 story high for almost 220 stories of building!!!! That isn’t a collapse….that’s what’s known as dustification. If a building collapses…there is still something there.

*****
15) If someone see's me typing a word then I am typing a word but since I can't type a word I can't be seen doing so even if I was, in fact, seen doing so..........got it?

If one person really saw the plane hit the Pentagon- then a plane hit the Pentagon, end of story. But we know with 100% certainty that the plane flew on a trajectory that did not permit it to hit the Pentagon so we know that nobody saw it hit .

*****
16) If we put this guy in the same room as the dude from #12 would they explode in a collision of mutual distrust annihilation?

and it appears to be a modus operandi of hit em with science and run away -
smug in the self satisfaction of another wonderfull CT kill.

well - hello
we dont care about your science - we know whats really going on .
...
the last person id listen to is a scientist -
narrow minded is an under statement for most of these people.

in any case, most true scientific discoverys are based on informed instinct
...
yours BB
CT NUT
and also a scientist .

*****
17) Making tools out of stone? It's never happened so it can't be thought up and done!

Because such a thing had never happened before. The thought cannot be thought.

*****
18)
1] Start with insane premise
2] Turn insane premise into a procedure
3] Fail at procedure
4] Congratulations, you've proved nothing!

How can 110 story towers turn themselves into powder in 10 seconds? Try clapping your hands 110 times in 10 seconds. Go ahead, try to cheat (I demonstrate tapping the palm of one hand with the fingers of my other hand as quickly as I can). You will never make it up to 50, yet you are being asked to believe that 110 story towers turned themselves into powder in 10 seconds - both in the exact same way.

*****
19) Well, here's the problem: they built a concrete building when all the plans and blueprints clearly specified steel.

Exactly anyone that wants to deny 9/11 needs to go to saudi arabia and meet the supposed hijackers that "burned" in the towers, because they are still alive leading normal lives as doctors, lawyers, etc. And not to mention Building 7 where a fire on the fifth floor of a CONCRETE building made it collapse at free fall speed..hmmmmm

*****
20) Seriously, has anyone ever photographed these airplane things using that alleged reflected light?

For example, planes, radio waves, electromagnetism, and light move around without leaving "hard evidence" yet they exist.

 

[Dave Rogers]

First to vote! But it was a very tough set of choices, and on another day I might have picked a different subset. 2 has the perfect storm of ignorance and arrogance, 3 is perfect signature material, 4 is just a classic, 15 is a brilliant piece of inverted conspiracist logic, and 17 is a masterpiece of overstatement. And 20 - I simply had to vote for that, because it left me with literally no idea what point the originator believed he was trying to make.

A good crop this month.

Dave

 

[Agatha]

Tremendous!

I went for 3, 10, 15 and 17.

 

[cwalner]

1) because Denial is not just Da River in Egypt
4) for the delicious Irony and arrogance
8) because it reminds me of a joke along those lines - the punchline is "Iceberg, Goldberg, Silverberg. What's the difference"

 

[Hokulele]

16. Self-contradiction never gets old.

 

[timhau]

I say I voted for 12, but there's no patriotic duty, social obligation or reason to believe I did.

 

[Horatius]

I usually try to restrict myself to voting for three finalists, but I had to go with 5 this month. 2, 4, 5, 6, and 11.

And at least 4 of the options are my nominations! Do we get a prize for the most nominees to make it into the finals?

 

[Sabrina]

Whoo-hoo, one of them is my nomination! I think that's the first time mine made it into the finals!

 

[Trojan_Jockey]

17, its just so concisely simple and stupid. Would make a great T-shirt slogan.

 

[triforcharity]

I had to vote for 3, as IMHO, it is just mind-blowing.

4 Would have been my next choice, and I think I about wet myself laughing when I first saw it.

 

[Travis]

I was very sad that I couldn't include the "retro-reflectors defy laws of optics" one because it was so sweet.

Oh, well.

 

[TexasJack]

I love irony, so I went with 4.

 

[Baylor]

What's up with 18. That seems very 2005ish.

 

[Klimax]

Am I blind or my nominations didn't make it?

Oh well,looks like we packed Stundies once again... I'll try next time... again.

(I voted BTW)

 

[dudalb]

8, because total ignorance of History so publically displayed carries a lot of weight with me.

 

[Toke]

3, 8, and 17.
Not uninformed, just clueless.
Not knowing just app. years of israel and titanic.
It cannot be thought? Don't read much SF?

The last is my favourite.

 

[twinstead]

Delightful crop of material this month. I'll pick 12, because I as well have never believed anything I have ever seen or heard. Ever. Nor do I believe I exist. Or this forum.

 

[Sabrina]

*roots really really hard for her nomination*

 

[Orphia Nay]

What's up with 18. That seems very 2005ish.

"Clunkity-clunk" was 2005 or 2006. "Clappity-clap" is so NOW, man! Can't you see the great strides the Truth Movement have been making?

 

[Horatius]

Is anyone else disturbed by the possibility that a narcissist might win a "popularity" contest?