Merged O.j simpson guilty or not guilty.

[pipelineaudio]

Because the court said so in his criminal trial

 

[332nd]

Popcorn smiley isn't good enough... We got a ribs smiley?

ETA:

 

[LibraryLady]

No, the court said he was not guilty.

 

[casebro]

No, it was the jury that said "not guilty".

Later, a civil court did find him guilty.

 

[Thunder]

Jury nullification clearly took place at the criminal OJ trial.

if the trial took place 20 years later, I suspect a different outcome would have occured.

 

[Ladewig]

Because the court said so in his criminal trial

Is there some political aspect of his case that I am not aware of?

 

[Arcade22]

Is there some political aspect of his case that I am not aware of?

See this thread:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=163182

 

[cyclonic]

Innocent men don't put guns to their own head and order his friend to give every police car in LA a tour of the freeway system.

Before he was arrested didn't his lawyer leave the OJ mansion with a bag of unknown contents? (bloody clothes?)

 

[TexasJack]

No, they said he was guilty.

 

[cyclonic]

Guilty or not guilty of double homicide?


Please feel free to comment on why you think OJ is guilty or not guilty of murdering Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman or even why you cannot decide.

 

[KingMerv00]

There is "guilty in criminal court" and there is "guilty as an objective fact". OJ is the latter, but not the former.

 

[Caustic Logic]

There is "guilty in criminal court" and there is "guilty as an objective fact". OJ is the latter, but not the former.

Hmmm... Hmmmm... There can be a distinction? What a conundrum. How does one establish this "objective fact?" Why haven't you gone to the authorities with this fact?

(nothing personal, just using your words as a springboard, mate!)

 

[332nd]

Guilty, but I believe the prosecutors and investigating officers blew the case.

 

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Guilt or not guilty of what?


Even though I don't know, I voted guilty nonetheless.

 

[Neally]

Hmmm... Hmmmm... There can be a distinction?

Yes, when one does something wrong, they are guilty of wrong doing. Whether they are convicted in court is a separate issue.

How does one establish this "objective fact?"

It's not a matter of establishing it, they either did it, or didn't.

 

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Because the court said so in his criminal trial

Wrong: http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/10/04/oj.simpson.verdict/index.html

 

[cyclonic]

Guilt or not guilty of what?


Even though I don't know, I voted guilty nonetheless.

Sorry about that, i fixed it.

 

[Ladewig]

See this thread:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=163182

What does a thread involving three different governments and the actions they have taken have to do with this thread?

 

[hgc]

No, it was the jury that said "not guilty".

Later, a civil court did find him guilty.

Civil courts deal with matters of liability, not of guilt.

 

[The Central Scrutinizer]

My vote stands