stamenflicker
Muse
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2004
- Messages
- 869
"Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am." This is a remarkable claim, but not of divinity exactly. He is not naming himself "I am", he's just using the words. I must have said "I am" hundreds of times without meaning that I'm God.
Indeed. I think Jesus was a very slippery guy, or at least portrayed that way in the Gospels. Religious people always seemed to try to nail him on something (I guess the eventually did, i.e. the cross
In this case though, I think knew exactly what he was claiming in front of a group of people that he knew were going to get pissed off. The reaction of the crowd seems to indicate they had a good idea of what He was claiming. I can't remember if its in this story or another one when they pick up stones and get ready to kill him. He asks them, "I've shown you many good things from the Father, for which one of these are you stoning me?" And the crowds answered, "Not for any good work you've done, but because you being a man make yourself out to be God." Actually I found it, its John 10:31ff.
http://www.studylight.org/desk/?query=joh+10:32&t=kjv&st=1&new=1&sr=1&sc=1&l=en
Anyway, it's enough for me to think he claimed to be God.
As far as Revelation goes, that does nothing to reassure me of the thing that's bothering me --- that even if we take the Bible at face value, the claims for Jesus' divinity and the rest of the (evangelical) doctrine of salvation are more likely to have been made up by early Christians rather than being part of Jesus' original message.
I totally understand. It certainly could have been made less ambigious. There are numerous ways to look at it I suppose, which to me points to the authenticity of the documents and an earlier written date within in accepted timelines (I mean that as opposed to a fabrication, which would look "neater" and be more internally consistent.) These folks were probably still trying to figure out years after the puported resurrection what the heck just happened. That Paul had to visit the Jerusalem church so often in his early ministry would also indicate that there was likely some disagreement about what all of it meant. At the end of the day though for right or wrong, they seemed to settle on the issue on the side of Paul.
BTW-- I like your new sig, what does it stand for?
Flick
Last edited:
