NOVA reran this 2002 episode last night. It presented several arguments about Neandertal's relationship to modern humans. Here is what I gathered from the show (which I may or may not be relaying accurately):
1. mtDNA evidence suggests Neandertals and modern humans are cousins who shared are a common ancestor about 500K years ago.
2. There appears to be no traces of Neandertal DNA in modern humans, so evidently they did not interbreed. Or if they did, none of the offspring survived. This suggests they are separate species.
3. Anthropologists have found artifacts that suggest were very much like modern humans except for art.
4. Comparative anatomy suggests Neandertals and modern humans are the same species only of a different variety.
5. mtDNA shows that modern humans can all trace a lineage back to sub-Saharan Africa *after* Neandertals were well-established in Europe. This also suggests Neandertals are cousins rather than ancestors.
Since the show was first broadcast in 2002, that means the science behind it is probably no more recent than 2001. Has there been any interesting new finds on this question? Any additional genetic work?
To me it seems that the DNA analysis would settle the matter and we'd have to conclude Neandertals are cousins rather than ancestors, right? Wrong?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/neanderthals/
1. mtDNA evidence suggests Neandertals and modern humans are cousins who shared are a common ancestor about 500K years ago.
2. There appears to be no traces of Neandertal DNA in modern humans, so evidently they did not interbreed. Or if they did, none of the offspring survived. This suggests they are separate species.
3. Anthropologists have found artifacts that suggest were very much like modern humans except for art.
4. Comparative anatomy suggests Neandertals and modern humans are the same species only of a different variety.
5. mtDNA shows that modern humans can all trace a lineage back to sub-Saharan Africa *after* Neandertals were well-established in Europe. This also suggests Neandertals are cousins rather than ancestors.
Since the show was first broadcast in 2002, that means the science behind it is probably no more recent than 2001. Has there been any interesting new finds on this question? Any additional genetic work?
To me it seems that the DNA analysis would settle the matter and we'd have to conclude Neandertals are cousins rather than ancestors, right? Wrong?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/neanderthals/