Dali's Ghost
Student
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Messages
- 34
I am interested in hearing opinions from doctors who have treated nasal snuff users as patients or otherwise have experience with the long-term effects of nasal snuff.
I have found one academic paper that addresses the question.
Nasal snuff: historical review and health related aspects.
Author: Nikolay Sapundzhiev; Jochen Alfred Werner
Journal: Journal of Laryngology & Otology
Pub.: 2003-09
Volume: 117
Issue: 9
Pages: 686, 6p
To quote from the abstract:
I am interested in this because I quit smoking last year and I’ve wanted a cigarette almost every day since then. I smoked for 14 years and that was the fourth time I quit. Each time was harder than the one before and I’ll never smoke another cigarette again. If I start again, I’m not sure I’ll have the willpower to quit a fifth time. Recently, I was reminiscing about my youth with a friend and I remembered that I had used nasal snuff briefly when I was 19.
I bought some this week and tried it again. It is definitely different from cigarettes. When I started smoking after quitting previously, the first few cigarettes made me slightly nauseous. The nasal snuff burns like a mother-[rule 8] but the effect is very pleasant otherwise. There is just the relaxing nicotine buzz without the wheezing and sick feeling that a cigarette would give me. I have only tried it three times over the last couple days, but I can already feel the addiction kicking in again. I can stop now, though, without too much trouble.
So are the authors of that paper crazy? Should nasal snuff be avoided? Or is it a relatively safe alternative to cigarettes?
I have found one academic paper that addresses the question.
Nasal snuff: historical review and health related aspects.
Author: Nikolay Sapundzhiev; Jochen Alfred Werner
Journal: Journal of Laryngology & Otology
Pub.: 2003-09
Volume: 117
Issue: 9
Pages: 686, 6p
To quote from the abstract:
The health risks associated with [nasal snuff] are different to those attributed to smoking and oral wet snuff. The nicotine contained leads to dependency. Its resorption rate is similar to that of smoking, so it could be seen as an adequate substitutional therapy. The risk for cardiovascular diseases is lower, compared to that for smokers. Chronic abuse leads to morphological and functional changes in the nasal mucosa. Although it contains substances that are potentially carcinogenic, at present, there is no firm evidence, relating the use of nasal snuff to a higher incidence of head and neck or other malignancies.
I am interested in this because I quit smoking last year and I’ve wanted a cigarette almost every day since then. I smoked for 14 years and that was the fourth time I quit. Each time was harder than the one before and I’ll never smoke another cigarette again. If I start again, I’m not sure I’ll have the willpower to quit a fifth time. Recently, I was reminiscing about my youth with a friend and I remembered that I had used nasal snuff briefly when I was 19.
I bought some this week and tried it again. It is definitely different from cigarettes. When I started smoking after quitting previously, the first few cigarettes made me slightly nauseous. The nasal snuff burns like a mother-[rule 8] but the effect is very pleasant otherwise. There is just the relaxing nicotine buzz without the wheezing and sick feeling that a cigarette would give me. I have only tried it three times over the last couple days, but I can already feel the addiction kicking in again. I can stop now, though, without too much trouble.
So are the authors of that paper crazy? Should nasal snuff be avoided? Or is it a relatively safe alternative to cigarettes?