• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mythic Origins of the Qur'an

TimCallahan

Philosopher
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
6,293
By the time Muhammad wrote or dictated the surahs of the Qur'an, supposedly under the dictation of the Archangel Jabril (Gabriel), he had a wealth of myth, pagan, Zoroastrian, Jewish and Christian, upon which to draw. Thus, almost all of the narratives in the Qur'an are derivative and mythical.

This is particularly true of Surah al-Kahf, "the Cave" the 18th surah, which is made up of three stories. In one, from which the surah takes its title, some pious youths take shelter in a cave to sleep and wake 309 years later. The verses of the surah dealing with the sleepers (Q 18:9 – 26) give no particular reason why God puts them to sleep for 309 years, and they are even vague on how many sleepers there are (Q 18;22):

Some say, “The sleepers were three, and their dog made four.” Others say, “They were five, and their dog made six” – guessing in the dark – and some say, “They were seven, and their dog made eight.” Say [Prophet]. “My lord knows best how many they were.” Only a few have real knowledge about them, so do not argue, but stick to what is clear, and so do not ask any of these people about them.

The story is based on a tale written by Joseph of Sarug (d. 521) called “The Seven Sleepers of Ephesus.” According to the story seven young men who are Christians flee Ephesus because of the persecution of Christians by Emperor Decius, who reigned from 249 to 251. They take shelter in a cave and, due to their piety, God allows them to sleep for 196 years. They awake to find that Christianity is everywhere triumphant.

Another story in Surah 18 is based on one of the legends that grew up around the persona of Alexander the Great. The Jewish historian Josephus recorded one of these as historical fact in his Wars of the Jews (7:7:4):

Now there was a nation of the Alans, which we have formerly mentioned somewhere as being Scythians and inhabiting at the Lake Moetis. This nation about this time laid a design of falling on Media and the parts beyond it, in order to plunder them; with which intention they treated with the king of Hyrcania; for he was the master of the passage which king Alexander [the Great] shut up with iron gates.

Josephus was alluding to an attack on the Medes by the Alans, a major division of the Sarmatians, who had succeeded their relatives, the Scythians, as the nomads controlling the Russian steppes. The Alans lived just north of the Caucasus Mountains. Hyrcania was an ancient kingdom located along the southern shores of the Caspian Sea and the Caucasus Mountains. The Sarmatians, like the Scythians before them, were nomadic horsemen who were the terror of the civilized world. From 641 – 617 BCE, the Scythians invaded Near East, devastating the declining Assyrian Empire. They at first helped the Assyrians break a siege of Nineveh by the Medes and Chaldeans in 615, but later switched sides and aided the allies in destroying Nineveh in 612. Eventually, the Medes had to drive them back across the Caucasus Mountains. The Scythians were the probable inspiration for the Gog and Magog prophecies in Ezekiel 38 and 39. This prophecy was alluded to in the Book of Revelation, leading end-times prognosticators, such as Hal Lindsey, author of The Late Great Planet Earth, to identify Gog and Magog as the Soviet Union.

Josephus said that Alexander the Great had blocked a mountain pass with iron gates because this story was already a legend with wide currency in the ancient world when he wrote Wars of the Jews, shortly after the fall of Jerusalem to the armies of Vespasian and Titus in CE 70. In Surah 18, verses 92 – 99 tell this legend in monotheistic terms:

He traveled on: then when he reached a place between two mountain barriers, he found a people who could barely understand him. They said, “Duh’l-Qarnayn, Gog and Magog are ruining this land. Will you build a barrier between them and us if we pay you a tribute?” He answered, “The power my Lord has given me is better than any tribute, but if you lend me your strength, I will put up a fortification between you and them: Bring me lumps of iron!” And then, when he had filled the gap between the two mountainsides [he said,] “Work the bellows!” And then, when he had made it glow like fire, he said, Bring me the molten metal to pour over it!” Their enemies could not scale the barrier, nor could they pierce it; and he said, “This is a mercy from my Lord. But when my Lord’s promise is fulfilled, He will raze it to the ground: my Lord’s promise always comes true.” On that day, We shall let them surge against each other like waves and then the Trumpet will be blown and We shall gather them all together.

Thus, the legend of Alexander erecting an iron barrier against the Scythians has been blended with the Gog and Magog prophecy from Ezekiel, which itself is treated, as it was in the Christian Book of Revelation, as an apocalyptic prophecy.

Alexander the Great is called Duh’l-Qarnayn – that is, “Two Horns” – in this passage because of another legendary allusion. While he was in Egypt, between the battles of Isus and Gaugmala, Alexander had an epiphany, that he was the earthly incarnation of Zeus – Ammon, a combination of the rulers of, respectively, the Greek and Egyptian pantheons. Since Ammon was represented as having rams horns, it became customary to either represent Alexander with two rams horns coiling tightly against his head or to refer to him as having horns. However, this characteristic bequeathed to him by the ancient Egyptian pantheon notwithstanding, Alexander is shown in this passage as a follower of Allah.

Finally there is in Surah 18 is a long tale about Moses traveling with a person only identified in the Qur’an as one of God’s servants (Q 18:60 – 82). Moses asks if he might travel with the man; to which the man says Q 18:67, “You will not be able to bear with me patiently.” Moses insists that he still wishes to travel with this servant of God, and they set out. As they come upon a boat on the seashore, the stranger makes a hole in it. When Moses asks why, the man reminds him that he had told him that he would find the man’s company hard to bear. Moses apologizes for asking. Then the stranger kills a young boy. Moses is horrified, but the stranger again reminds him of his warning. They travel on and are refused hospitality at a town. Nevertheless, the stranger repairs a wall there that was crumbling. Moses again finds this behavior inexplicable. Why didn’t the stranger demand payment from these inhospitable people? At this point, the stranger says they must part company, but explains his seemingly wicked and illogical actions: The boat belonged to needy fishermen. A tyrant in the region was seizing all serviceable boats. His men would pass over the damaged boat, which the fishermen could then repair. The boy was actually wicked and dangerous. The servant of God prayed that God would send his parents a better son once he had killed the boy. The wall belonged to two young orphans, and a treasure buried under it would be found by hem when they matured. Had the wall crumbled too early, they would not have been mature enough to manage it properly.

This story may be based based on a Jewish legend about Rabbi Joshua ben Levi, who lived in the first half of the third century. Rabbi Joshua meets the prophet Elijah and begs to travel with him. Elijah agrees on one condition: Rabbi Joshua is not to question anything Elijah does. The rabbi agrees. After some days’ journey they are accepting hospitality from a poor couple. Elijah prays, and the couple’s cow dies. While this perplexes Rabbi Joshua, he says nothing. A rich man denies them hospitality, and Elijah rebuilds his wall. They are also not shown hospitality and a certain synagogue. Elijah says to them, “May many of you be princes.” When they are given hospitality another synagogue. Elijah says, “May only one of you be a prince.” Finally, Rabbi Joshua can bear these oddities no longer, and begs Elijah to explain himself. Elijah says, “Very well, but because you have asked, our journey together is now over.” He then explains that the Angel of Death was going to take the poor man’s wife. Elijah prayed that Death take the couple’s cow instead. The rich man’s wall concealed buried treasure. Had it fallen down, the miser would have found it. By repairing the wall Elijah kept it out of his hands. As to the two synagogues, many princes means disunity and strife. One prince means unity, order and peace.

In Arabic legend, the one who traveled with Moses in the Islamic version of the story is al-Khider, variously translated as “the green one” or “the ever-young” (i.e. as such ever-green). The reason he could be identified with Elijah, and the reason Elijah could be wandering through the world centuries after he lived, is that Elijah didn’t die, but was assumed, living, into heaven, ascending in a whirlwind by a chariot of fire (2 Kings 2:11, 12).

Though in most parallels between Jewish legends and the Qur'an the Islamic material is derivative, it is possible in this case that the story in Surah 18 antedates the Jewish parallel and is thus the source legend. Even if that is the case, however, al-Khider is of pagan origin, a form of the Green Man, the earliest image of which is to be found on a Jain temple in India.
 
Thanks. That was interesting.
I'm not an expert, but it seems to me that religious ideas spread in the same way as other man-made ideas. How many Native American myths are there in the Quran or Bible? Strange how the most succesful prophets were those sent to the Middle East. And how the pagans of Mecca kept alive some 'Abrahamic traditions' but the people on the other side of the world either recieved no prophets or did not manage to retain the rituals/ideas that prophet brought with him. Well, other than the basic ideas you'd expect people to re-invent such as 'murder is bad'.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. That was interesting.
I'm not an expert, but it seems to me that religious ideas spread in the same way as other man-made ideas. How many Native American myths are there in the Quran or Bible? Strange how the most succesful prophets were those sent to the Middle East. And how the pagans of Mecca kept alive some 'Abrahamic traditions' but the people on the other side of the world either recieved no prophets or did not manage to retain the rituals/ideas that prophet brought with him. Well, other than the basic ideas you'd expect people to re-invent such as 'murder is bad'.

Along with pagans, there were, by the time Muhammad lived, three Jewish Arab tribes living in Medina. These were apparently Arab converts to Judaism as opposed to people genetically related to the Jews. Christian influences came from Coptic Christians who apparently fled Egypt due to persecution from the Byzantine authorities. The Copts apparently held some heterodox views that the Patriarch of Constantinople found heretical. Another Christian influence came from Ethiopia, whose king, Abraha, had invaded what is now Yemen and even laid siege to Mecca. Zoroastrian influences came from the Sassanid Persians. Their king, Chosroes, took advantage of some instability in the Byzantine Empire following an assassination and a coup, to invade Syria, the Levant, Egypt and portions of Asia Minor.

As to why American Indians never developed a major monotheistic revealed religion, you have to remember that the formation of the Abrahamic religions came through successive layering of cultures in the Iron Age and built on traditions and mythologies that had evolved in the Bronze Age. While the achievements of the Maya, Aztecs, Inca and other civilizations of Mexico, Central America and Peru were impressive, most of the m didn't come into being until the Common Era. Thus, they might not have had time to develop a parallel to the revealed religion.

Also, there may have been certain specificly local forces at work, perhaps even mere random chance, that set the Near East up to produce specifically revealed religions, rather than religions of enlightenment, such as Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Confucianism etc.
 
There are many stories in the Bible that have earlier versions in other religions and cultures. i.e. the flood story.
 
One ofthe oddities of the Qur'an is its repetitivenes. It would appear that Gabrial delivered to Muhammad the same stuff over and over, perhaps forgetting that he'd already told that story to the Prophet. Consider one example of this, the story of Iblis the jinn (a being of fire) refusing to bow to Adam in defiance of God’s command. This story appears in passages from seven different surahs (Q 2:34, Q 7:11 – 18, Q 15:26 – 40, Q 17:61 – 65, Q 18:50a, Q 20:116 – 123, Q 38:73 – 85). Here are two of the quotes about this fallen angel:

Q 2:34: When We told the angels, “Bow down before Adam,” they all bowed, but not Iblis, who refused and was arrogant: he was one of the disobedient.

Q 18:50a: We said to the angels, “Bow down before Adam,” and they all bowed down, but not Iblis; he was one of the jinn, and he disobeyed his Lord’s command.

The disobedience of Iblis, which results in him being cast out, sets up the story of the fall of man, which, since the Qur’an leans heavily on the Jewish scriptures, is only alluded to in the surahs.

The name Iblis ( pronounced ihb-LEES) is a corruption of the Greek word diabolos, which means “slanderer.” Diabolos was Latinized to diabolus and subsequently altered to diablo in Spanish and corrupted to deofol in Old English, devel in Middle English and finally “devil” in modern English. When the Arabs borrowed the Greek word via Syrian Christians, they mistook the initial “d” as a Syriac genitive form. Diabolos thus became Iabolos, then Iblis. Therefore, Iblis is none other than Satan. That his name was derived from a Greek word rather than one of Semitic origin is part of the Christian, as opposed to Jewish, origin of his story in the Qur’an.

The story of God telling the angels to bow to Adam, and Satan / Diabolos refusing, originated in a sixth century Syriac work from the school of St. Ephrem titled The Book of the Cave of Treasures. God commanding the angels to bow to Adam is a particularly Christian notion. In Judaism humans are considered lower, not higher, than the angels.

Thus, not only is the particular name of Satan in the Qur’an derived from Greek and Syrian Christians, the origin of his being cast out by God for refusing to bow to Adam, rather than being the dictation from the archangel Gabriel, were from a Christian work scarcely a century old when Muhammad was alive.
 
Last edited:
As to why American Indians never developed a major monotheistic revealed religion, you have to remember that the formation of the Abrahamic religions came through successive layering of cultures in the Iron Age and built on traditions and mythologies that had evolved in the Bronze Age. While the achievements of the Maya, Aztecs, Inca and other civilizations of Mexico, Central America and Peru were impressive, most of the m didn't come into being until the Common Era. Thus, they might not have had time to develop a parallel to the revealed religion.

It's not just that the Native Americans didn't develop monotheistic religion -- I didn't even know they hadn't. The point is the differences between relgions and how the size of that difference varies with the amount of contact the believers had. Especially with those matters which are arbitrary -- like names and rituals.

The story of God telling the angels to bow to Adam, and Satan / Diabolos refusing, originated in a sixth century Syriac work from the school of St. Ephrem titled The Book of the Cave of Treasures. God commanding the angels to bow to Adam is a particularly Christian notion. In Judaism humans are considered lower, not higher, than the angels.

I don't where the Yazidi got the idea from, but they also have that story:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazidi#Religious_beliefs

Only they think that Melek Taus was right to refuse to bow to Adam. Then there is this about Sufis:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,979909,00.html

Time said:
The Sufis, the mystics of Islam, imagined that the pride of Iblis may have been blind ideological purity, a supremely flawed political correctness. According to one account, when he was asked to bow before Adam, God's newest and best-beloved creation, Iblis refused. "There is only one God," he declared, "and I will make obeisance only to Him." More of a monotheist than God himself, Iblis was banished from Heaven.

Who was influencing whom by that stage, I don't know.


ETA: And I was going to mention Shaitan, as well. Which seems very close to Satan:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satan#In_Islam
Apparently a title, not a name.
 
Last edited:
One ofthe oddities of the Qur'an is its repetitivenes. It would appear that Gabrial delivered to Muhammad the same stuff over and over, perhaps forgetting that he'd already told that story to the Prophet.

That's probably an artifact of the Qu'ran being mostly orally transmitted among early Muslims. Repetition aids memorization (it's also a prevalent feature in, for instance, the Homeric epics).

It wasn't until after Mohammed's death and after his immediate companions (the Sahaba) also started passing away that the various memorized and written components were finally codified into a single written work.
 
. . . I don't where the Yazidi got the idea from, but they also have that story:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazidi#Religious_beliefs . . .
Going to the link above, I found the following about the Yazidi:

Their religion, Yazidism, is a branch of Yazdânism, and is seen as a highly syncretic complex of local Kurdish beliefs and Islamic Sufi doctrine introduced to the area by Sheikh Adi ibn Musafir in the 12th century. The Yazidi believe in God as creator of the world, which he placed under the care of seven holy beings or angels, the chief of whom is Melek Taus, the Peacock Angel.

Considering the great degree of syncretism in Yazidism, its incorporation of Sufi beliefs and the fact that it apparently cme into being in the 12th. century, I'm pretty sure they picked up the story from Islam.
 
One ofthe oddities of the Qur'an is its repetitivenes. It would appear that Gabrial delivered to Muhammad the same stuff over and over, perhaps forgetting that he'd already told that story to the Prophet.
Oddly enough the Qu'ran itself explicitly denies there was an angel, saying that the words were inspired by Allah in Muhammad.

The Quran says that people ask why an angel was not sent down and answers that if an angel was sent then the time of judgement would follow close behind.

On the other hand Al-Qadr says "this was sent down on the night of Al-Qadr when angels and 'Ruh' come down bearing decrees".
 
Their religion, Yazidism, is a branch of Yazdânism, and is seen as a highly syncretic complex of local Kurdish beliefs and Islamic Sufi doctrine introduced to the area by Sheikh Adi ibn Musafir in the 12th century.

[...] Considering the great degree of syncretism in Yazidism, its incorporation of Sufi beliefs and the fact that it apparently cme into being in the 12th. century, I'm pretty sure they picked up the story from Islam.

I'm not sure the article is saying that Yazidism came into being in the 12th century, but rather that the Sufi influence was in the 12th century. I was under the impression the Yazidi religion pre-dates Islam. But I don't know when the bowing to Adam story became a part of it.

The Book of the Cave of Treasures may well be the source the story.


ETA: This link is clearer
http://www.religious-information.com/yazidi-religion.html

It is reported that the religion originated in the early 12th century with its founder Shaykh Adi-ibn Musafir who died in 1162. His tomb at Laliş is a focal point of Yazidi pilgrimage.

I guess I was wrong.

ETA2:
and a quote from another wiki article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazdânism

The most notable case is that of Izady (1992) who, in his eagerness to distance the Ahl-e Haqq from Islam and to give it a purely Kurdish pedigree, asserts that the sect is a denomination of a religion of great antiquity which he calls "the Cult of Angels". This "Cult," he states, is "fundamentally a non-Semitic religion, with an Aryan superstructure overlaying a religious foundation indigenous to the Zagros. To identify the Cult or any of its denominations as Islamic is simply a mistake born of a lack of knowledge of the religion, which pre-dates Islam by millennia." He fails, however, to produce any evidence at all in support of his theory, and some of his assertions can only be called preposterous.

OK, case closed.

ETA3-All right, one more
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/2656/ancient-faith-is-a-reminder-of-iraqs-diversity

Yazidis have been in Iraq, Syria and Turkey for centuries and consider themselves descended from the biblical prophet Abraham. Cholo believes that they existed in ancient times and had a temple in old Babylon. But that account of their history would seem at variance with the fact that their main sheik, Adi, who wrote their sacred text, did not live until the 11th or 12th century.

At least I wasn't the only one to believe it was so old.
 
Last edited:
Another story copied in the Quran is taken from the Infancy Gospel of Thomas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infancy_Gospel_of_Thomas
Which contains stories of Jesus' childhood. Wiki says the book was written to satisfy demand 'among early Christians for more miraculous and anecdotal stories of the childhood of Jesus than the Gospel of Luke provided'.

The story I'm thinking of is the one where Jesus bring clay birds to life.
Quran, verse 3:49
http://www.sacred-texts.com/isl/quran/00305.htm

'I have come to you,
With a Sign from your Lord,
In that I make for you
Out of clay, as it were,
The figure of a bird,
And breathe into it,
And it becomes a bird
By God's leave'
 
Last edited:
Along with jewish and Christian stories, both biblical and extra-biblical, the Qur'an and Islamic legends draw rather heavily on Zoroastrian material.

The Muslim Paradise is repeatedly depicted as gardens through which flow refreshing streams of pure water, milk, honey and wine. Worshipers recline on couches and eat fruit. The male worshipers, at least, are given virginal spouses of unblemished beauty. The very name Paradise derives from pairideaza, a Persian word for an enclosure, by implication a walled garden. The young women with large, dark eyes, untouched by either man or jinn, the nymphs of Paradise, are called houris, which derives from the Persian huri, meaning a being of light. The jinn, which we have anglicized to “genies,” are beings of fire, which are also of Persian origin. The Persian original of jinn is jaina. The use of so many titles based on Persian loan words – Paradise from pairidaeza, houri from huri and jinn from jaina – is, in itself, an indication that the Prophet’s revelations were highly derivative, with Zoroastrian myth being an important source.

Muhammad’s night journey is only referred to obliquely in the Qur’an, yet is considered a turning point in his career, since, immediately after this vision, converts from Yathrib (which became Medina) asked the Prophet to come and rule them. The one definite reference to it is in verse Q 17:1:

Glory to him who made His servant travel by night from the sacred place of worship to the furthest place of worship, whose surroundings we have blessed, to show him some of Our signs: He alone is the All Hearing, the All Seeing.

The “sacred place of worship” is generally thought to be Mecca, while the “furthest place of worship” is Jerusalem. This allusion is all we have in the Qur’an that is explicitly about the night journey. Ibn Ishaq recorded the actual details of this visionary experience in his biography of the Prophet. He says that Muhammad was miraculously transported to Jerusalem and from there he ascended to heaven itself. According to ibn Ishaq, Gabriel lifted Muhammad to he top of Mt. Burraq. Presumably this means the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. There, Muhammad beheld a ladder going up to heaven, which he ascended.
The ladder calls to mind Jacob’s ladder from Genesis. However, Zoroastrians made such a claim about a pious young priest 400 years before the birth of Muhammad. According to certain versions of the myth Muhammad rode to Jerusalem in one night, and possibly rode into heaven, on a magical, winged horse named al Burraq, rather than being transported to Mt. Burraq. This immediately calls to mind the story of the Greek hero Bellerophon attempting to ride the winged horse Pegasus into heaven. So we have here three possible sources of the imagery of the Night Journey: Genesis, Zoroastrian legend and Greek mythology.

The picture is confused further by the fact that Muhammad’s favorite wife, Aisha, reported that his body was not missing from his bed on the night he supposedly visited both Jerusalem and heaven. This brings to mind Paul’s recounting of a visit to heaven in 2 Corinthians 12:2 – 5:

I must boast; there is nothing to be gained by it, but I will go on to visions and revelations of the Lord. I know a man in Christ who, fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven – whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows. And I know that this man was caught up into Paradise – whether in the body or out of the body I do not know, God knows – and he heard things that cannot be told, which man may not utter.

Thus, Muhammad’s visionary experience could even have Christian roots.
 
Another story copied in the Quran is taken from the Infancy Gospel of Thomas
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infancy_Gospel_of_Thomas
Which contains stories of Jesus' childhood. Wiki says the book was written to satisfy demand 'among early Christians for more miraculous and anecdotal stories of the childhood of Jesus than the Gospel of Luke provided'.

The story I'm thinking of is the one where Jesus bring clay birds to life.
Quran, verse 3:49
http://www.sacred-texts.com/isl/quran/00305.htm

Yes, there's quite a bit of material on Jesus in the Qur'an and a lot of material on Mary. Muhammad treated all of his Christian material, canonical gospels, non-canonical gospels and Christian legends as equally inspired.

He also seems to have confused certain Christian doctrines with his own perceptions of Christian practices, as can be seen in his rather odd view of the Trinity (Q 5:116a):

When God says, “Jesus, son of Mary, did you say to the people, ‘Take me and my mother as two gods alongside God?’” he will say, “May you be exalted! I would never say what I had no right to say – if I had said such a thing You would have known it. . . .”

Muhammad seems to have conflated the near deification of Mary with the Trinitarian doctrine of three persons in the Godhead, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The veneration of Mary in medieval Christianity, in which she was given such titles as “Mother of God” and “Queen of Heaven” or “Queen of Angels,” may well have been particularly intense among the Coptic Christians of Egypt. The Christians co-opted the imagery of the cult of Isis and Osiris in the process gaining power and eliminating their competition.
 
By far the greatest source of the Qur’an’s narrative material comes from Judaism. This material comes not only from the Jewish scriptures, but as well from the Talmud, the Aggadah, and from targum and midrash. Since the Qur’an was such a late document, even in comparison to the Christian scriptures, by the time Muhammad was writing the surahs, a vast body of commentaries and mythic elaboration on the text of the Jewish scriptures had been written. The Talmud, a compendium of tales, commentaries and laws, was completed a century prior to the time of Muhammad. The Aggadah another such compendium, was written between the period of the Second Temple (destroyed in CE 70) and the completion of the Talmud. Targums, translations of the scriptures from Hebrew into Aramaic, along with commentaries, were being written in various ages. The word “targum” is derived from the Hebrew root tirgem, meaning to explain or translate, referring to the translation into Aramaic. In addition to this form of literature, various rabbis wrote homiletic commentaries explaining biblical texts. Some of these were written after the time of Muhammad, but many antedate the Qur’an. A midrash is a homiletic tale or a story meant to explain certain oddities in the Jewish scriptures. The word “midrash” derives from the Hebrew root drsh, meaning to search, investigate or examine. Muhammad apparently lacked the discernment to separate the Jewish scriptures from commentaries and mythic elaborations, and treated the later material and scripture alike.

Here's one example. In Surah al Ma’ida, or "The Feast" (Q 5), verse 31 says that after Cain killed his brother Abel, God showed him how to deal with dead bodies:

God sent a raven to scratch up the ground and show him how to cover his brother’s corpse, and he said, "Woe is me! Could I not have been like this raven and covered up my brother’s body?" He became remorseful.

This story is based on the Targum of Jonathan, Pirke Rabbi Eliezer, chapter 21:

Adam and his companion sat weeping and mourning for him and did not know what to do with him, as burial was unknown to them. Then came a raven, whose companion was dead, took its body, scratched in the earth, and hid it before their eyes. Then said Adam, “I will do as this raven has done,” and at once took Abel’s corpse, dug in the earth and hid it.

Although Muhammad altered the story to make Cain the one to bury Abel, the motif of God sending down the raven to show humans how to bury their dead is clearly derived from the Targum.
 
Last edited:
Here's one example. In Surah al Ma’ida, or "The Feast" (Q 5), verse 31 says that after Cain killed his brother Abel, God showed him how to deal with dead bodies:

And, in 5:32, the Quran says:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/isl/quran/00505.htm

On that account: We ordained
For the Children of Israel
That if any one slew
A person—unless it be
For murder or for spreading
Mischief in the land—
It would be as if
He slew the whole people:
And if any one saved a life,
It would be as if he saved
The life of the whole people.

Which is taken from this commentary:
http://www.on1foot.org/text/mishna-sanhedrin-45

...capital cases - his blood and the blood of his offspring depend on him until the end of the world, for we find concerning Cain who killed his brother, it is written, "the bloods of your brother cry" (Genesis 4:10); it does not say, "your brother's blood" but "bloods" - his blood and the blood of his offspring. Another interpretation of "brother's bloods" - his blood was dashed on the trees and on the stones. Therefore man was created singly, to teach you that whoever destroys a single soul of Israel, Scripture accounts it as if he had destroyed a full world; and whoever saves one soul of Israel, Scripture accounts it as if he had saved a full world.
 
Last edited:
Another set of Jewish source material used in the Qur'an were the books of the Pseudepigrapha ("falsely inscribed"). These were usually apocalyptic works ascribed to an ancient patriarch, king or prophet. Probably the most important of these was the Book of Enoch, written ca. 160 BCE. It is ascribed to the pre-flood patriarch Enoch, of whom, after saying he was the father of Methuselah, Gen.5:24 says, "Enoch walked with God and he was not, for God took him." The Book of Enoch is supposedly what Enoch saw and learned when "God took him," i.e. when he was assumed into heaven. It tells how the “Watcher” angels assigned to watch over humans and protect them, instead, under the leadership of two angels, Shemhazi and Azazel, went down and had sex with mortal women as part of a revolt against God.

In the Qur’an, Enoch is referred to as Idris. Surah 19:56, 57 say that that God raised Idris to a high position, possibly a reference to his assumption into heaven. While in heaven, Enoch has a vision of the Watcher angels corrupting men. This leads, eventually, to Noah’s flood. The story of the fall of the Watcher angels in the Book of Enoch was the source of a story in the Talmud of two angels, Shamhazi and Azael who descended to earth and there were seduced by a woman named Aster (Gr. “star”).

In Arabic legend the woman was called Zahara. In Aramaic, her name was Baiduht, and in Persian, Anahit. This was the name of a goddess in the Zoroastrian pantheon who corresponds to the Roman Venus. In the Qur’an, verse Q 2:102 alludes to two fallen angels:

[Evildoers and disbelievers] taught people witchcraft and what was revealed in Babylon to the two angels Harut and Marut. Yet these two never taught anyone without first warning him, “We are sent only to tempt – do not disbelieve." From these two they learned what can cause discord between man and wife, although they harm no one with it except by God’s leave . . . .

Although the Qur’an itself doesn’t elaborate on the two angels in Babylon, Arabic mythology tells of how Harut and Marut fell from grace. The angels, looking down from heaven, held human beings in contempt because of their many vices. God told them to be more tolerant, saying that, if they were in a fleshly form, they too would subject to temptation. They disagreed, and God challenged them to send two of their own down in human form to be tested. The angels agreed and chose two of the fairest among them, Harut and Marut. They descended to earth in human form and were seduced by the woman Zahara, showing that angels, once clothed in flesh, were as susceptible to sexual temptations as humans. Zahara wheedled from her two angelic lovers the secret word they used to ascend to heaven. She ascended to heaven and attached herself to the firmament as the planet Venus. God punished the two angels for revealing the holy word, giving them the choice of freedom but eternal separation as fallen angels or being bound in chains in a well in Babylon until the Last Day, when they would be freed. Humbled by their failure to resist temptation, they chose the latter.

Thus, the brief description in Genesis 6 of angels coming down and siring a race of giants was elaborated into the revolt of the Watcher angels led by Shemhazi and Azazel in the Book of Enoch, then altered to the story of two angels, Shamhazi and Azael, being seduced by the woman Aster, in the Talmud, and finally reworked into the Arabic myth of the angels Harut and Marut –alluded to in the Qur’an – being seduced by the woman Zahara. Zoroastrian elements were woven into the myth as well, since the names Harut and Marut seem to be derived from Haurvatat and Ameretat, two angels from cult of Mithra and Anahit.
 
In another Jewish legend, Noah’s grandson Canaan failed to board the ark. In the Qur’an, verses 11:41 – 43 say:

[Noah] said, “Board the Ark. In the name of God, it shall sail and anchor. My God is most forgiving and merciful.” It sailed with them on waves like mountains, and Noah called out to his son, who had stayed behind, “Come aboard with us, my son, do not stay with the unbelievers.” But he replied, “I will seek refuge on a mountain to save me from the water.” Noah said, “Today there is no refuge from God’s command, except for those on whom he has mercy.” The waves cut them off from each other, and he was among the drowned.

Once again a Jewish legend at variance from the original scriptures has been elaborated on and folded into the Qur’an as a direct revelation from God.
 
A number of Surahs deal with Abraham’s refusal to worship idols and the consequences of his steadfast stand:

Q 6:74: Remember when Abraham said to his father, Azar, “How can you take idols as gods? I see that you and your people have clearly gone astray

Q 21:68 – 70: They [the people Abraham condemned for idolatry] said, “Burn him and avenge your gods, if you are going to do the right thing” But We said, “Fire, be cool and safe for Abraham.” They planned to harm him, but We made them suffer the greatest loss.

Q 37:93 – 98: [T]hen [Abraham] turned and struck [the idols] with his right arm. His people hurried towards him, but he said, “How can you worship things you carve with your own hands, when it is God who has created you and all your handiwork?” They said, Build a pyre and throw him into the blazing fire,” They wanted to harm him, but We humiliated them.

The only allusion in the Bible to Abraham’s father – Terah, not Azar – worshipping idols is toward the end of the Book of Joshua (Josh. 24:2):

And Joshua said to all the people, “Thus says the LORD, the God of Israel, ‘Your fathers lived of old beyond the Euphrates, Terah, the father of Abraham and of Nahor; and they served other gods.”

The idea that Abraham’s ancestors served other gods apparently inspired the author of the Midrash Rabbah, written ca. CE 400 to conflate Abraham, Nimrod and a story from the Book of Daniel into a new myth. In the Midrash, Nimrod casts Abraham into a furnace for refusing to worship idols. Conflating Abraham and Nimrod takes only a reasonably minor liberty with Genesis, since Nimrod is mentioned in Gen 10:8 – 12, and the immediate genealogy of Abraham begins in Gen. 11:24. Since Gen. 11:1 – 9 tells the story of the building of the Tower of Babel, and since Babel (Babylon) is located in Nimrod’s kingdom, he has traditionally been cast as an arrogant, impious tyrant and the chief instigator in building the Tower of Babel. Thus a mythology grew up about him attempting to kill Abraham in the latter’s infancy and continuing to persecute Abraham through his life. The story in Midrash Rabbah of Nimrod casting Abraham into a furnace, from which the patriarch emerges unscathed, is clearly based on the story in Daniel 3 of Nebuchadnezzar, ruler of the Chaldean Empire, throwing Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego into a furnace – out of which they are delivered unscathed – for refusing to worship Nebuchadnezzar’s golden idol. Since both Nimrod and Nebuchadnezzar could be portrayed as tyrants, and since both Daniel’s companions and Abraham refused to worship idols, it was easy attribute the ordeal of Daniel’s companions to Abraham. Muhammad borrowed the tale from the Midrash Rabbah and retold it in Surah al-Anbiya
(Q 21:69 – 71).
 

Back
Top Bottom